User talk:Naveen2706

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nbrtodays.com (May 19)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nbrtodays.com Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a place for promotion.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Phil Bridger,

Greetings from India..

I feel blessed to have company of so many Mentor's...really appreciate your concern, Phil.

Let me add further, I do not ever meant to usurp any Law of Land, anyone, even, atleast, Copyright protected material...never...ever...…..I am myself a qualified Advocate professional, apart from being a Fellow Member of the prestigious Institute of Company Secretaries of India. I am a MBA (Finance) from AIMA, New Delhi apart from PGDM (Corporate Laws & Management) from famous Indian law institute, Supreme Court premises, New Delhi..I am also Cost Acccountant (Inter-1), Masters in Commerce....There-apart, I was legal Adviser to lot many celebrity (Cricket, Cinema, TV)…. I appear in the High Court's as also others tooo..

My back-ground is just to show how careful person, as law abiding I am always.

Now comimg to your specific concern, Phil, pl visit my website https://nbrtodays.com .......where u will find the Parliament made laws as also, those compiled/abridged verison/*5 page capsule, made in my own language ONLY,,,(100% Trademark Registered) in my sole name itself...…

The material posted/hosted on your website ….WIKIPEDIA...is also, the same compiled/abridged/*5 page capsule of the original Law's (approx. 50-100, even 200 pages) made by the Parliament......……...…………………...In brief, these are MY original works,,,,no infringement at all...……….Above, all,,......………. I have Trademark on all these works/writings...……………………...…

Hope to have adequately addressed your concern...I understand, in the times of hardship during COVID-19, You all must be facing challenging times...…. For this very purpose, I have recently uploaded the "DISASTER MANAGEMENT ACT, 2005", as made applicable in India Jurisdiction for lock-down since past 2 + months. Pl compare any of my works with the Law/Act of Parliament,...............my vision, mission ...always, 100 pages made into 5 pages (appprox.)...simply,  this is my USP ever-since school days, college days and now Professioanl life (LEGAL), which is my PASSION.

I hope your kindselves, your learned team at Wikipedia will allow, help me post the material for now and future, under same conditions, I have explained hereinabove...… I fully understand and abide by Wikipedia Rules.

I remain.

Naveen2706 (talk) 10:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop
Your edits so far have consisted of line-by-line commentaries on acts of Parliament with no surrounding context. Such content is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, so please stop. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Just to echo Phil Bridger, please stop. Posting your nonsense on your talk page is an abuse of your talk page per WP:TALK. The junk you added to Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines violates WP:NOTAFORUM. If you will not constructively edit then you should quit Wikipedia. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RexxS (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear RexxS,

Understand your understanding of Law is not OK. Pl understand my reply earlier, which 100% complies with Wikipedia undernoted guidelines/Quote:

"Difficulty, in good faith, with conduct norms A number of users wish to edit, but find it overly hard to adapt to conduct norms such as collaborative editing, avoiding personal attacks, or even some content policies such as not adding their own opinions in their edits. These would be dealt with through guidance, simplified suggestions on how to contribute or reediting the content to the style and standards of Wikipedia. In a small number of cases this may lead to a friendly block with warnings or even bans in some long term cases. Failure to adapt to a norm is not by itself, evidence that a user is not trying to contribute productively and some might require assistance so don't be inconsiderate."

Would really appreciate and request to unblock the Account, as I do work in public interest and for betterment and upliftment of the society, be it India, Globally.

Also request you to give your specific points of concern, and not just quote one or another links, which is not acceptable. Naveen2706 (talk) 04:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Insulting people is not a good strategy to get them to unblock you. You know nothing about me nor my understanding of law, and you certainly know nothing of what Wikipedia is.
 * It is not a free webhost for you to display your research. You've been asked enough times not to post that on Wikipedia, and yet you persisted in doing so. Nobody with any respect for their fellow editors would be so dismissive of their concerns and of the conventions that we have agreed to govern behaviour on this site. "Errare humanum est, sed perseverare diabolicum" - Seneca.
 * I will not unblock you as I have not seen any sign that you realise what you have done wrong nor any assurance that you will not repeat that behaviour. Take some time to read WP:GAB to understand how to write an unblock appeal, and take the time to read the policies that have been drawn to your attention. You'll also find that you don't get to define what is acceptable here. --RexxS (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I will not unblock you as I have not seen any sign that you realise what you have done wrong nor any assurance that you will not repeat that behaviour. Take some time to read WP:GAB to understand how to write an unblock appeal, and take the time to read the policies that have been drawn to your attention. You'll also find that you don't get to define what is acceptable here. --RexxS (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

User no more interested
Dear RexxS,

Understand your limitations, but, no Wrongdoing on my part atleast, at all..I repeat.

Wikipedia lives in its own woven world, imposing Autocracy. In India, we live in Democracy..i.e. there is mutual give and take....Think about it, U will grow by leaps & bounds.

Just Fyi, I am no more interested in WIKIPEDIA.. which is bent upon its own theory, which no one understands... As my experience, as also, I have seen by research on your website where Indians, many of their articles rejected for really astonishing grounds.....

I am happy for the short stint with WIKIPEDIA, great learning and wish it Good Luck for future.

Naveen2706 (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)