User talk:Navenator

June 2021
Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LBRY, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

I have put a description of the change both times and you keep reverting it. Why are you doing this? Navenator (talk) 08:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Edit summaries stating that you don’t like the content you keep removing aren’t adequate justification for removal of sourced content. The onus is on you as the editor proposing the removal of sourced content to use the article talkpage to find consensus for removal with other editors. Edit summaries are fine for small changes, but major changes like the ones you keep making require talkpage discussion and consensus.   Acroterion   (talk)   11:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Fine make it whatever you like. I was trying to remove political bias stating that editorial sources are not a source. It's just an opinion. Only hurts wikis credibility. Politics should be removed as much as possible. Just mention things that are correct and relevant. The fact you keep reverting implies you are the one who has a strong opinion on the matter. Maybe another editor should get involved. Navenator (talk) 13:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you really believe that edit warring is going to fix the issues you think the article has? 15 (talk) 00:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I see no edits from this account to any article talkpage. Why is that?  Acroterion   (talk)   00:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Toowoomba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kerry (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

What was wrong with the reference I provided. It's a government body? Navenator (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It was written in 2013 projecting what they thought the population would be in various future years, 2021, 2031, 2036). It was certainly not 2021 census data as you said; that data is yet to be released. If you want to cite something about census data, then the source we use is the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Kerry (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)