User talk:Navi Alert/Lyonia mariana

Peer review questions
1. First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

- This article goes into detail without sounding too wordy, it explains aspects of the plant without sounding like an academic journal or making it hard to understand for the average reader. The taxonomy was also very detailed which is nice to see because I had a hard time finding a lot of information on my plant. The grammar is done really well too.

2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

- I would create one of those taxonomy boxes on the side of the article so it can condense a lot of the information at once. The toxicity category was a really unique one, are there any reported cases of toxicity from human consumption of honey or the plant itself?

3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

- Adding some more information to the conservation category would improve the work. It would be cool to learn why these trees are more endangered in some places while less in others.

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

- I would like to have a more in-depth ecology topic in my article as well as researching if there is enough evidence and sources to justify trying to add a toxicity header into my article.

Ejackson345 (talk) 02:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)