User talk:Navid Baig Hamid

Welcome!
Hello, Navid Baig Hamid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 17:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Samanid Empire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tahirid dynasty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fazel Baig. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 17:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 17:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Do not delete my edits.
What i wrote is right. I live in Fazel Baig and i know everything about that place and the history. Do not delete my edits. Navid Baig Hamid (talk) 18:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


 * That's great, but your knowledge can't be used in our articles, as the welcome message says. Read WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. Unsourced material is likely to be deleted. Our criteria for sources is at WP:RS as well as WP:VERIFY. Doug Weller  talk 19:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Leaving wiki
Leaving wikipedia for ever and will not edit again, Navid Baig Hamid (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)