User talk:Navyworth

Speedy deletion of Fist of Zen
A tag has been placed on Fist of Zen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cenarium (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Oj, svijetla majska zoro
Regarding your edits of Oj, svijetla majska zoro: I agree that the article is overburdened with various versions of the lyrics; however, it was not idea to merge the song with Hey, Slavs, but rather with God of Justice. Perhaps it would be the best to mention the lyrics at a new article, f.e. Proposed anthem of Serbia and Montenegro. Nikola (talk) 08:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

good ideaNavyworth (talk) 17:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mapacg.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Mapacg.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. B (talk) 03:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Krstasgb.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krstasgb.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. B (talk) 03:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Your addition to File:Mapacg4.png has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Your last edit to Montenegro
Please see Talk:Montenegro for detail. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Montenegrins, Ethnic Montenegrins
As per talk page; If a person never claimed Montenegrin ethnicity - Not an ethnic Montenegrin - Not in infobox was my comment reverting your revision. Your answer was: ''everybody listed here is VERY Ethnic Montenegrin. STOP the SERBIAN RADICAL PROPAGANDA!!!''. Could you please show me sources with Mihailo I of Duklja · Constantine Bodin · Petar II Petrović-Njegoš · Nicholas I of Montenegro · Ivan I Crnojević · Krsto Zrnov Popović · Marko Miljanov etc, are called "ethnic Montenegrin"? Montenegrin and ethnic Montenegrin are not the same.--Z oupan 14:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Navyworth, please stop your vandalism of the page Montenegrins. If you have any disagreements with the general conscensous about who is considered to be ethnically Montenegrin then please provide sources and discuss them on the talk page. User:23_editor 16:48, 28 June 2012 (User talk:23_editor)

Please reply, we need to resolve this.--Z oupan 21:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

You are involved in an issue at the Administrator's Noticeboard
See here: .--R-41 (talk) 00:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for a day for edit-warring and overall unconstructive aggressive conduct at Montenegrins.

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think Navyworth's block is injudicious and I have raised an objection to it. The link can be found here. Tamsier (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Theocracy of Montenegro
Why would you want to move the page to "Theocracy of Montenegro", which you just invented (0 hits). I moved it because I thought it was an appropriate name. "Metropolitan of Cetinje/Montenegro" (19/63) is a correct term, since Vladika correctly translates to Metropolitan bishop. "Prince-Bishop of Montenegro" is mostly used for Njegosh (104 hits) in poetry-related sources, while in Serbian "митрополит црногорски" or "владика црногорски" is used, but never "Владикат Црна Гора". "Prince-Bishopric of Montenegro" has only 6 hits. However, if we search "Petrovic-Njegos"+"Metropolitan" we have 24 hits, "Petrovic-Njegos"+"Prince-Bishop" we have also 24 hits ;; "Petrovic-Njegos"+"Prince-Bishopric" 35, "Petrovic-Njegos"+"Metropolitanate" 9. Based on this I accept Prince-Bishopric as a good name, but we should bold "Metropolitanate of Cetinje" also and clear out all names in the name section. I'll ask an administrator to move the article to "Prince-Bishopric of Montenegro". But please do not remove Serbian Cyrillic, as Njegosh wouldn't like it, and we need to talk instead of reverting.--Z oupan 21:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Warning: Move-warring
Move-warring, as you did at Montenegrins, is a particularly disruptive form of edit-warring. Stop it now. If you mess with those page titles without prior consensus once more, you will be blocked for a longish period. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:09, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Identitet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bajaga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Formatting references
I refer to your edit here:. Whilst I appreciate that you added new and relevant referenced information to the article, please note that Milla Jovovich is currently a good article. In order to meet and maintain good article status, all references must be formatted using an approved method, which in this case would be either cite web or cite book. All references on wikipedia should be formatted with an approved method; however, it is especially important to do this for 'good' and 'featured' quality articles. For an example of how to use cite web, see here:. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 01:07, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FK Mladost Podgorica logo (2011-on).png
 Thanks for uploading File:FK Mladost Podgorica logo (2011-on).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Redirects
Yes, I know that 'Montinegro' doesn't exist (and that it's really Crna Gora - Black Mountain - anyway...). One purpose of redirects on Wikipedia is to take care of misspellings by people searching for something. You can spell, I can spell, but lots of people can't. Montinegro and Montenegro both sound the same in spoken English, so far as casual speaking is concerned. This is not a defamatory redirect, or a useless translation of a foreign term used in English as a common word - it's simply a misspelling catcher, and quite harmless. Peridon (talk) 12:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Srednjaregija.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Srednjaregija.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FK Mladost Podgorica logo (2011-on).png
Thanks for uploading File:FK Mladost Podgorica logo (2011-on).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Sadkσ  (talk is cheap)  20:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)