User talk:Nawaz Khan99

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Billa II. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Billa_II&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Johannes003 (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Here is the edit where your work was removed - the other editor thought it was too many sources. I haven't looked at it closely enough to know if I agree, but I'd recommend discussing your proposed changes on the article's talk page - hopefully you and the other editor can figure out a compromise version.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Vandalism edits in Nanban
dont update article with illegal reports from blogs.. only reports from recognized websites are allowed in wikipedia.. Geocraze (talk)

July 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Almost every one of your recent edits has contradicted or been unsupported by sources, and some of the sources you are using are gossip-sites, blogs, or other ones that are not considered acceptable. This is against wikipedia policy. Your general pattern seems to be adding promotional or non-neutral wording rather than writing a formal encyclopedia. This is against wikipedia policy.'' DMacks (talk) 08:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Nanban (film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 07:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 13:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thuppakki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nanban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

the telugu dubbed version snehitudu is not a flop please help
someone has mentioned snehitudu has a failed at the boxoffice and also overall break even in the Indian boxoffice section by adding unreliable sources please remove those sentences along with those unreliable sources it spoils the look of the article here are the reliable sources such as hindu and times of india which states snehitudu is a hit http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-17/news-interviews/31070519_1_telugu-films-release  http://www.thehindu.com/arts/cinema/article2840296.ece    please add these sources and remove those unreliable sources  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.208.48 (talk) 07:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Thirumalai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Action and Romantic


 * Kadhalukku Mariyadhai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Once More


 * Sivakasi (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Shankar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

thuppakki budget
it is confirmed that it is 70 crore. but what convinces u that Accesskollywood is a reliable source? Didn't I give already two reliable sources (Firstpost and In.com) before u removed them? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Vijay (actor). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Torreslfchero (talk) 13:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jayakrishnan.ks100. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JK (talk) 07:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Google Google concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Google Google, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Google Google


Hello Nawaz Khan99. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Google Google.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back
Welcome back to Wikipedia. Where had you been for nearly the past one year? -- Kailash29792 (talk) 13:54, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arrambam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

April 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Tamil films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Removal of certain films from the list as seen between and without proper explanation. MeeGhaMan&#160;(talk) 08:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)