User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 18

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

IF you can put PHS, Ibrust and and CDMA2000 in wikipedia you can put broadband corDECT also.

I have recreated the artical but will proof it is real
If you need better proof or differnt or you consider thats it advertisment please message me in my talk.

Runningblader (talk) 00:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Why is RS Wenocur not notable -- meets almost all criteria
Alfred Legrand (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You might want to look at Requests for checkuser/Case/Alfred Legrand. CM (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Article re-created
An article you speedy deleted, John Broderick Msc, got re-created. Can you please re-delete the article, as it's been tagged again? Thanks! Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 01:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion - Lit Fuse Films
As you may remember, you deleted an article about Lit Fuse Films. I contested this. You said I had no credible sources. I have such sources now.

You said "It doesn't matter how good you think they are -- what matters is whether this company has been recognized as notable by reliable independent sources. So far, there's no evidence of that. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)" I Have such evidence. I can provide links to websites which have awarded litfuse various honors, which includes second and third place honors at the Bitfilm Festival under the machinima category. Both Maintnace Man and Ballad of Black Mesa are creations of LitFuse, and as you can see by visiting the bitfilm award page, these have in fact received awards. . I can also show that on DIGG one of their films has made the front page (Ignis Solus), and many video and machinima oriented sites have found Ignis Solus (one of Lit Fuse's films) to be very popular. I was planning on writing all this in the article when you restored it. Now, would you please restore the article?. If you refuse, I can always just rewrite it (there wasn't all that much there anyway) but that doesn't make sense considering a single line is missing. If you won't restore it, will you at least tell me if my evidence is sufficient, so that I don't write it again only to be deleted? Orangesoda31 (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * It would seem that they took down the awards info on that page, it was last years award after all. I will look for an alternative URL. Orangesoda31 (talk) 23:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I got one. . This page should be fairly constant. One last note: Zacharia Scott (whom is credited with the award winning films) is a member of Lit Fuse. You can find them on the Lit Fuse website if need be. Thanks. Orangesoda31 (talk) 23:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your time. I think I will stop here and wait for a bit more notoriety to reach them before I start again. You are a really great admin. Orangesoda31 (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion - Terminals (band)
Just wondering why this article (admittedly a stub) was deleted. I checked the criteria, and, well, it really doesn't meet any of the quick-deletion standards. First of all, The Terminals is not my band. Secondly, they are signed to Dead Beat Records, and two-thirds of the band own and operate Boom Chick Records. The Terminals are at least as big in the garage scene as [Brimstone Howl], and Boom Chick releases Brimstone Howl 7" EPs along with SPEED! Nebraska. I am trying to get the List of bands from Lincoln, Nebraska section updated, and The Terminals are a major part of that scene.  Please restore the page. Rawkstah (talk) 16:41, 7 January 2008

Riana lulz, or I'm running out of witty titles
Thanks for the revert and block. I take it that that image was not of Riana but pornographic in nature, yes? Will (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

The Option Knob
An editor has asked for a deletion review of The Option Knob. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Chalhub (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2008 (UTC) Hi Nawlin, I hope you will consider my previous response to your reason for deleting the Option Knob page. I have tried to clarify the misunderstanding that you had in your deletion and that the article is not a blatent advertisement but merely descriptive by a 3rd party. Once again, if you feel that there are elements of the article that leave the descriptive realm then by all means edit them, but I tried to only be as descriptive as the wiki entry Guitar Pick because I felt the Option Knob was a similar entry. Thanks for your understanding.

Brian Bohrer
Hi, please take a look at Brian Bohrer and let me know if I'm on the right track. I've added a few references from a newspaper. I've also added the ISBN numbers of his books. I'll be adding more. I was looking for your feedback as you were the person that prodded it. Kelevro (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Question on Hasan Salaam
Hi, I re-started the article on Hasan Salaam and I saw you deleted the original. Webhat (talk) 13:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion - Rising From Ruins
To NawlinWiki, You deleted the page I made on the band Rising From Ruins. I understand that I didn't have enough information and I think I get what you mean by it didn't have enough significance. I have added alot more information on the band but when I try to put it back on it deletes it again. If you could see the changes I have made and then tell me what I need to do so that it will pass or maybe the band is just not popular enough that would be very helpful. Thank-you NayhanAmor (talk) 04:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Draft Posted
I have posted what I have done of the draft for Rising From Ruins. Thanx NayhanAmor (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision history error; Biodiesel
I'm not sure if you'll be able to assist me in my query. There is a problem in the revision history of Biodiesel. I undid revision 183328408, [], by User:68.14.36.186; If you examine the next edit, it appears as though I've added something, though in fact, I removed an unhelpful addition. Later in the history, [], it appears that I re-added the same comment, though I did not, as noted in the edit comments. It appears as though a number of the editor's signatures have been transposed. I'm concerned about how this happened more than that it did happen. Any idea why? Do you know of anyone who would know? E8 (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok Then
Ok I understand the Notability Criteria now. Thanks again NayhanAmor (talk) 04:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Can I repost the page when the band meets one of the notability criterias?
 * Is there a limit to userpages ex. User:NayhanAmor/Rising_from_ruins?
 * Can userpages be speedily deleted?

The Measure
I'm trying to write about a local band and it keeps getting deleted. What do I need to do to stop it getting deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SalmonKing (talk • contribs) 15:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Why pxSpot deleted?
References and notability had been added to this article and it was re-created. What issues did you have with this?

CSD
Random House? Where is that? It surely isn't written in the article (also the article doesn't state why he's important - A7). -- Menti  fisto  15:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah okay, I was misled. Although the article really does not state why he's important. But I guess subtly works too. -- Menti  fisto  15:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Salting request
Care to salt The JB Magic Lounge? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Party (talk • contribs) 18:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Read Em And Weep
Usage guides or slang and idiom guides. Descriptive articles about languages, dialects or types of slang (such as Klingon language, Cockney or Leet) are desirable. Prescriptive guides for prospective speakers of such languages are not. See "Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook" below for more information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DukeNukemNinja (talk • contribs) 21:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Make Love Not War
How about instead of all this nonsense and arguing you just undelete my page and unblock Seriousam007, GoldenDemon8 and Cleptomatic007...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DukeNukemNinja (talk • contribs) 21:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

I am woggy
I seriously apologise for what i did to you in October. It just so happens that i was in a bad mood. I logged into today, hoping that my ban would be over, and it wasn't! i wanted to email you to request to be unblocked, but i could not find your email address! So i created another account. I promise never to insult you again. I will edit like a good wikipedian. But, its me woggy. What happened, happened in the past, so i guess its all over now, and i am ready to start again. (Wuggy (talk) 18:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC))

Hi, NW!
Re. the deletion of the attack article by User:Oliverkingiscool, could I impose on you to delete the photograph as well? That was only used in and for the attack. Thanks much, and I'll raise a beignet in your honor the next time I'm at Ralph Brennan's Jazz Kitchen. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Annie Leonard
Hi there. I saw you deleted the Annie Leonard article which I created less than 15 minutes ago, even tho I added the HangOn tag. I am a little disturbed that you deleted it despite the HangOn tag, but also you must realize that your reason for deleting (due to lack of material) makes perfect sense in light of the newness of the article. In the future, please do not delete articles which have HangOn on them. Thanks! Bstone (talk) 17:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Stubs are commonly used in wikipedia. Also, please respect hangon tags in the future. Thank you. Bstone (talk) 17:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me just take a moment to say that I feel the speed in which this article was twice deleted is absolutely unacceptable. I had no sooner created the article and was going to add the hangon tag that it was deleted. Even when I added the tag it was still deleted. I feel as tho I am under some sort of clock or watchful eye to prove this article in as short a period as possible, which of course leads to all sorts of poor editing. As a long time wikipedia editor, I hearby express my frustration.Bstone (talk) 19:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Why is Plogger being deleted every time?
What I don't understand is what I'm not including to make it considered "notable," while other pages like Coppermine Photo Gallery supplies no more information than I provided on my page. What is the deal here?

Aurachron (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion - Midnightshot
Why did you delete the Midnightshot (band) page? I was about to insert some references, when suddenly the page was deleted.

Checking on Artical MorparScape
Can you please check MorparScape to see if it is ready to be published back out?here's the the link User:Runningblader/Sandbox —Preceding comment was added at 02:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Foxy Shazam
I've updated the site I made for the band Foxy Shazam. I have been very patient with the process. I have an outside source's biography, two pages created by Foxy Shazam, and an interview from an outside source. I have a much more complete page with many more reliable sources than many other pages that remain up today. I think my page meets all or almost all requirements and if you could just let me put the page up that would be great. The band is growing in popularity and have nationwide tours. Please consider putting it back up. If anyone has any comments on it you can find it here User:Ryanlammi/Foxy Shazam. Thanks. —Preceding comment was added at 03:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I tried to rid the article of any bias and personal views toward the band. If you could please check it over one more time to see if there is anything I missed I would greatly appreciate it. Please tell me if there is anything else I should do or if you put it back up... Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.50.62 (talk) 03:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I have added numerous outside interviews and album reviews from across the country to prove this is not just a local phenomena and they are recognized throughout the United States and other parts of North America. I have so many more links and sources than countless pages and i believe that this is a perfectly valid page with little or no bias. Please take another look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.50.62 (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Jehovah God
Just FYI: the creator of the page Jehovah God had once again undid the redirect (in this case, yours) to the more pertinent page Jehovah. I have reversed that change back to yours (restoring the redirect), which was the result of the AfD. This may be an ongoing problem as this is the second time that this individual has undone the redirect. Mh29255 (talk) 07:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Lots to Gardens - Deletion
Why did you delete the Lots to Gardens page? It serves the same purpose as the page about The Food Project - which has not been deleted - and shouldn't be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lots to Gardens (talk • contribs) 15:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Radio derf - Deletion
Why did You delete "Radio Derf" article ? It is our small on-line blues radio station from Poland. We are trying to get as many blues lovers as We can. Blues is our love and live, We just want to show that in small Poland blues also exist. In polish version of wikipedia Radio Derf exist without problem polish version We will be very happy and thankful, If You put our article in wikipedia. It is a real deal for us because every single listener is very important. It is not a comercial because our radio is free and independent. Please give Us a chance

sorry for my language, my English is not so good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bguzik88 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Matt Howard. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. NatureBoyMD (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

University of the State of Pennsylvania
Hey, NW! I'm looking for the original text of this article. It was inappropriately deleted by Lucky 6.9 under the following terms:
 * 17:44, September 22, 2005 Lucky6.9 (Talk | contribs) deleted "University of the State of Pennsylvania" ‎ (content was:  )''

The fact remains that the institution existed as a University as designated by the Pennsylvania State Constitution of 1791, and that the term 'Commonwealth' has been used interchangeably in Pennsylvania, including in 4 incarnations of its Constitution.

I'm not certain whether this article title should be redirected to College_of_Philadelphia or what, but since it did exist under this name, I'd like to see the original text, if it is useable. Can you help? Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * expletive deleted* !!!


 * Well, then, I guess I'm on my own on this one. Thanks for the assistance! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Update: When you get a moment, please take a look at the newly created article and tell me what you think. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for those categories. I didn't even know some of them existed! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Still Pending AFD
Hello,

You have been a help to me in the past with an article I have edited for the band Still Pending. The article has been nominated for deletion for the third time. Would you mind visiting View log and entering your opinion? Thanks Stampsations (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA: Alexf
I have been nominated for an RfA. If you haven't done so already I would appreciate if you could go and comment on this page: Requests for adminship/Alexf. Thanks and happy wiking! -- Alexf (Talk/Contribs) 12:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Kevin McCullough
That was precisely what I was hoping to avoid. Someone needs to write a coherent article on the guy so that people don't start flaming him on wikipedia. Can't you at least semi-protect the deleted article? tinlv7 (Please copy a response here) 16:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * --Ah! Thank you.  Didn't even know the place existed 'til I saw your comment! tinlv7 (Please copy a response here) 16:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The Mikado (comic character)
Sorry about all that. I found The mikado and redirected it to The Mikado but then found you deleted it. I then found The Mikado (comic character) that was a redirect to the deleted The mikado so I delted that. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

U.S. Tour establishes notability
For my edification, please explain how at wikipedia a tour in the U.S. establishes notability? Cagey Millipede (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the answer. This is interesting.  I have a friend who was in a cover band that meets this criteria, but that band does not (and should not) have an article at Wikipedia.  Cagey Millipede (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I do note that the policy you cite has a footnote "The application of this criterion is disputed" and that the article in question did not purport to meet the "as reported in a reliable source" clause. But I understand your rationale.  Thanks.  Cagey Millipede (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I added it to Afd per your suggestion, and also created an Rfc on the C4 criteria. Cagey Millipede (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Banned user Beh-nam
Thank you for blocking banned user Beh-nam's sockpuppet AmericanAnthropologist01. He is correct about just making another account and continuing his edits. His newest is StevenLeClark. Doubtless he will admit it if asked. I have no doubt that he watches my edits, so he can be expected to read this one. Is there were a way to review his banning so that he would understand better why he was banned? From his comments here and elsewhere, I don't think he fully understands. --Bejnar (talk) 21:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Aquasana Page Being Deleted
This is a company in my town that has recently been voted one of the only companies in Texas to make the Inc. 500 list of fastest growing privately held companies. It has been written about in many publications, some of which I was still adding, and has recently launched a campaign to reduce bottled water's harmful impact on the environment. I see many other similar copanies with a wikipedia page with far less references than I had or was adding like Brita, Pur and Culligan. What do I need to do differently to note the history and economic impact of this health-conscious company? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Healthnut71 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Got it...I will edit info to company name rather than the brand name and include more information...thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Healthnut71 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

hey that article was totally true if you would look him up you would see that everything that i said about him was true and you can't tell me that it wasn't —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchelbonney123456789 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

thank you i dont know how to do all the things with the boxes and stuff yet

thank you i dont know how to do the boxs and all that to

can i ad things about family and stuff latter after i research it because my family knows him —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchelbonney123456789 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

all right i will run the facts by you first so that you can put them in because i you will be able to put them in a better way than i can thanks for all the help —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchelbonney123456789 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Dan Buckner Page Being Deleted
Why did you delete the Dan Buckner page? He is a football player about to start for the Texas Longhorns, and is the number 4 wide receiver recruit in the country! how is that not notable? Kodemunky (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Banned user Beh-nam
Thank you for blocking banned user Beh-nam's sockpuppet HouChangMao. His newest is RussianRoket. See contribs. It can get kind of discouraging. --Bejnar (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for blocking banned user Beh-nam's sockpuppet RussianRoket. His newest is BEIJINGBOY2. See contribs.  I know you have other things to do, so do I. --Bejnar (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for blocking banned user Beh-nam's sockpuppet BEIJINGBOY2.     Kandahar-Pashtun only has one edit as of 1:10 20 January 2008, but that edit and the timing (blocked at 22:59, edit at 23:47) make Kandahar-Pashtun a likely candidate for Beh-nam's next sockpuppet.  Worth watching. --Bejnar (talk) 01:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe he is saving Kandahar-Pashtun, because Beh-nam appears to be using RealAfghan112 (edits) today. --Bejnar (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's okay. Beh-nam was always a productive editor aside from his "agendas".  RealAfghan112 has some good edits in there, even if others of them are severely off-balance. Thanks for taking the time to look thme over. --Bejnar (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Why Did You Delete the KOUNTIN FAST CASH BIO????
All i did was write a biography about a popular underground rap group in Atlanta who's song "THIS IS HOW WE ROCK" is getting airplay in Barnesville,South Carolina / Augusta,Georgia. I do not understand this is crazy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supa mario770 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of a page of importance
This page i created is of relevance to a county. The whole of B&NES would benefit from this page as it shows the means of life with a hearing problem, which there was a recent event involving hearing problems in B&NES which is why it is of relevance. That page was created for a reason not just for the hell of it.

The mains street singers
In the brief time this article existed, I thought I saw a mention of international engagements. Even if the source isn't valid, it would seem that the assertion of notability has been made. Am I wrong in that? (BTW, I didn't create the article; I just saw it in Special:Newpages.) Pairadox (talk) 02:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

edit to your user page
I have added a link to verify that you are an admin. If you don't like it, remove it; that's the beauty of a wiki. Also those vandalism detection links are really smart. Jon513 (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Kamtjatka bear‎: Thanks for fix
Thanks for your fix on the Kamtjatka bear‎ redirect. I shoulda had that second cup of coffee before doing it. :-) -- Writtenonsand (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Egyptian Mau
Hello I saw your post to User:EgyptianMaus, and notice you are an admin. Could you please see my post to the user here about adding his website to the Egyptian Mau page. and regarding his email to me? You may have better advice for him than I do. I tried my best, but don't know if I posted the right thing to his talk page. Can you please look it over? Thanks. ← Gee ♥ Alice  23:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Retail assist
Hey there. It's fun watching the speed at which Wikipedia operates. 10:18, "Retail assist" is created. 10:20, I update the page, wikifying it. 10:21, I post on the creator's talk page, asking if it's really notable enoguh to be on wikipedia. 10:22, page has been speedy deleted for non-notability. :D Keep up the good work --Quadraxis (talk) 15:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I dont think that was nice
I'm trying to write good articles here about the history of everyday objects and they get deleted. I don't see why this is fair especially when I have been using the credible source: History: The Master's Guide series.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamlegend182 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help!
Hey, thanks for helping me put the writing assignment rubric where it was supposed to go! I'm still getting a feel for this assignment. If you have a chance, would you mind looking it over for me and making sure I've covered everything correctly? Thanks again! ABrundage, Texas A&amp;M University (talk) 18:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Tamara Holder: Urgent!
I have been attempting to generate an entry for Tamara Holder/Attorney Tamara Holder that has been deleted...again. If you read her bio she is actually an integral component of/creating history in legal justice and the african american community. She works directly alongside Jesse Louis Jackson in related protests and cases, even testifying in Supreme Court. Is it necessary for one of the administrators to generate these entries for her to prevent deletion or flagging? It has been re-written several times for compliance.

I was making the page....and you deleted it...what gives?
I was in the middle of making a page about an artist from Alaska...and now you deleted it!! I had clicked on save page because I wanted to see how it looked...and the next thing I knew, I had a message and it was gone. I was about to add sources too! Aren't you allowed to build a page as you go?!?!

I realize that my previous activity on Wikipedia has been somewhat foolish and silly, but that was when my friends and I were just messing around because we didn't realize Wikipedia was taken so seriously...I accidentally got my friend's dad's page deleted because of that and wanted to recreate it...but apparently not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greekeulogy (talk • contribs) 19:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Selma Blair
I'm not sure that you should have been the one to block User:Wishlab, based on all the reverting you'd been doing at Selma Blair, and especially considering that the source was pretty shoddy to begin with. Can you allay my fears? sho y  19:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Blair Hornstine
I don't understand the full reversion. Both versions leave much wanting but the clean sweep is not allowing the page to grow. Question - isn't "notoriety" a term that can not exist with a NPOV? Also, my edits to the page consisted of rolling back Dickey and inserting citations - is this a breach of the NPOV policy? And if it is, how so?

RealAfghan112
RealAfghan112 has shown his true colors, i.e. sockpuppet of Beh-nam, with, for example, his edits on Hazara people at 00:59, 24 January 2008 changing Afghan to Afghanistani, Afghan Canadian at 04:40, 23 January 2008 inserting "Afghani" in the lead thus aping Beh-nam's sockpuppet HouChangMao's edit of 21:33, 18 January 2008, and Afghanistan at 01:57, 22 January 2008 moving the depreciated demonyms back into the Infobox, thus aping Beh-nam's sockpuppet BEIJINGBOY2's edit of 17:29, 19 January 2008. In addition, RealAfghan112's other edits to Hazara people ape those of BEIJINGBOY2. --Bejnar (talk) 01:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * RealAfghan112 has been blocked as a sockpuppet of Beh-nam. --Bejnar (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Edward Melley
Sorry 'bout that - my CSD template went on too late. Apoligies,  ACBest Dog and Bone  18:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Moses Rosen
The published info is from an official book published in Hebrew and includes info that exposes for the first time his passing of advance warnings to the Hagana while working as a British official.

WP:DRV
Somebody had the cheek to open a DRV on your deletion of a hoax article. Spartaz Humbug! 20:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fun over at Pixar
We regularly (that is, every few weeks or so) have a user -- 71.114.242.105 -- post a link to his own blog on the Pixar (and at times, various other pixar-related) page. We've posted a note on their talk page that WP:NOT a collection of links, etc... but they seem to be rather persistent. It's not exactly vandalism, and the blog itself is really not notable in any way (it's known in the pixar community for spreading false rumors and plagarizing material from other sites and presenting it as its own -- see any uncited WP reference to Cars 2 that's been added and removed). I don't think a block is in order, as it's more annoying than aggravating as they seem to have a dynamic IP that changes regularly. What's your opinion on how to handle a situation like this? SpikeJones (talk) 03:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

AFCL
We at the AFCL understand your motivation for deleting our Wikkipedia article, yet we wish to plead for you rsympathy on this matter.

We are a fledgling league in an extremely unknown and unappreciated sport.

We are merely tring to promote our sport, which we believe is famil friendly and great exercise, as well as being fun to play.

At the current time we are unable to provide sources, but that is merely because the is already little coverage on our sport and we must fight to get even the most simple wikipedia article in order to promote our sport.

Thank you for your consideration,

David and the AFCL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The fantastic number 23 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Another Nede sockpuppet
User:Edenmontana-caceda seems to be treading some of the same ground as User:Nede, down to recreating the deleted Antoinette Moliterno page you deleted a while ago

Ttwaring (talk) 16:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Warning?
This is not a garage band. This is a legitiment Record label in Columbus, OH. If you need proof, please talk me. This is rediculous. I provided enternal links, referances, what else do i need? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stretchnuttz (talk • contribs) 21:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk page DB
Oh, crap. I am SO sorry about that. I followed a link from CIO and thought it was to the article. Pairadox (talk) 06:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

New artical please check
Can you check my newest artical(which is at the bottom) and see if it's good enough to put out?location:User:runningblader/Sandbox Runningblader (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Unblocked SLICKFINGERS
Hey, I unblocked User:SLICKFINGERS. They seemed genuinely contrite, and seemed to have made some honest mistakes with regard to creating articles. Admitedly, they made them MANY times, despite the warnings, however given their unblock request, they show a genuine understanding of their mistakes, and a willingness to work within the rules for the future. If they continue along the same path, I will reblock them. If you feel this unblock was inappropriate, please feel free to leave a demand for my desysoping at WP:ANI. Thanks... --Jayron32. talk . contribs 19:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Trfccurt
I don't do much blocking, so I thought it better to contact you- you blocked this user ages ago, and User:Guddock has just edited the userpage claiming to be their sock. (That's Guddock's only edit so far.) Also, judging from the fact that they moved Trfccurt's userpage to the namespace (under the name The best wikipedia user to ever be banned, and with the summary "that is wat i am/was"), and the similarity of usernames, User:Curttrfc appears to be another sock. Someone has already tagged them as such. I realise this is trivial stuff, I just wondered what the procedure was. J Milburn (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted Reubnick article
Hi, I remember a few days ago there was an article about a youtuber named Reubnick that got deleted. I was about to remake it, and the page said that it has been deleted twice, because it has no significance. Could you please tell me why it was deleted? Is there any chance of it going back up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dickdumbass (talk • contribs) 00:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Question about notability of Desmond barrick
So as I understand your speedy deletion declination, anyone who has ever played cricket for England is notable. Just verifying for future reference. Jons63 (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Reformatted post
why did u delete the australian french cricket page! how are we suppoosed to pass info down through the ages if we do not have a page on wikipedia This comment was not made by STYROFOAM☭1994 TALK 17:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC) (I just reformatted the message)

My Page
I made a page about Grayson Moran, that being myself, but it got deleted cause it seemed to be about someone. How do I prove it's me and make it a page with that title? You said I could write under my grayjax page but then when people search grayson moran it wont go to my page. any ideas? and is there any way to recover my page? thanks, grayjax — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayjax (talk • contribs) 19:47, 28 January 2008
 * If you want to make your own page which is search-engine-visible, consider a social networking site or getting your own webhosting. Wikipedia is not your own tool for self-promotion. haz (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok haz, i just thought it was a nice place to be since it's like an encyclopedia, so if someone wants to look up grayson moran they can find me, thats all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayjax (talk • contribs) 19:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

ok nawlin
that would be nice if you could move it to my grayjax page. sorry for the inconvienence and thanks again.

Benedict Silberman
Please do not remove the article. Rather extend it. Thanks JonneeS (talk) 19:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Morse L Holladay
what can i do to get this approve? Is decorated Military service not sufficient? i have cited references. please guide me. Tomholladay (talk) 20:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Chipotle Days
Why was "Chipotle Days" deleted? I am a big believer in the "Chipotle Days" concept, and I feel and betrayed by the page's recent removal. This is a major event amongst New Jersey actuaries, and "Chipotle Days" deserves world-wide recognition. Please reconsider. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dippy21 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Loadmp3
Thanks for the feedback on this article - forgive me, it's my first, but the reason I wrote it was because it seemed a relevant and worthwhile addition to the list appearing in the last category link in Online music stores, so I thought the limited background info I managed to get from the references, especially from cross-referencing known artist and labels data catalogued in Discogs seemed pretty relevant. Let me know if I'm barking up the wrong tree with this one! Hudson702 —Preceding comment was added at 17:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Witzwil, the swiss labor camp for refugees
well it is damn hard to get independant sources for a secret labor camp! it is damn hard because no one cares about these refugees there. But it is all completely true!!! I will petition some of the african embassies to clarify that indeed many of their citizens are held at secret locations in switzerland. But ur just not going to find many sources for something kepot hush hush like this...but go ahead man...delete the only article dealing with this issue and cut off the refugees only line of communication to the outside world...go ahead man and be the one that did it!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FreyasCrystalizedAngels (talk • contribs) 20:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

OK...here is a linkl to show it really exists, its in german of course

but u know...nobody but the inmates themselves are going to be able to be used as a source, no one besides them knows what its like there!!! the swiss arent going to write about it, and certainly not in english, theyr going to talk about their nice fancy tourist locations! u'll never hear about this man!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FreyasCrystalizedAngels (talk • contribs) 20:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

and the fact is, they dont even tell their own peopel about it, most of the swiss people have never heard of this place and have no idea what it is like, its not auschwitz type thing i am claiming here, there are not fanciful outlandish claims, its the simple truth i have stated FreyasCrystalizedAngels (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

86.128.8.208: possibly premature block
I notice that you blocked the IP address shortly after they were reported to WP:AIV for a "spree of malicious redirects (at least 9 consecutive), continuing after warning". Actually, their last edit was about a minute before their one and only warning. Not that the block is really a big deal (they were doing nothing but vandalism, and the odds are if anyone with good intentions edits from that IP address they won't do it in the next 31 hours). But it seems like "jumping the gun" to me. -- Why Not A Duck 20:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

United Kingdom article
Looks like there's an edit war going on with the United Kingdom article. Could you take a look please? 21:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted Image
An image of mine was deleted without any warning. I'm curious as to why.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Image:Convergentladybug.JPG

The only description is "g7", not sure what this means. I may have not put a proper license on it, but shouldn't I have been warned before deleting? Calibas (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ice Records
An editor has nominated Ice Records, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Ambulance Service of Manchester
I truly believe that the article refering to the Ambulance Service of Manchester (ASM) should remain on Wikipedia. I realize that, in order for Wikipedia to remain a noteworthy website, administrators must moderate its content thoroughly. ASM has numerous achievements and (subjectively) a large civic importance in the Hartford, Connecticut region. Would adding local and state-wide achievements help this entry? Any input you could give me would be appreciated. Thanks! CSMorg (talk) 19:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CSMorg (talk • contribs) 17:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

why
why did you try to deleate my page Critisms of declining quality? it was a serious page i thought needed crating and maybe others improving it like my page droue —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fifaworld07 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I followed other small company profiles on Wikipedia
Hi, The article I write and keeps getting deleted and I'm on the verge of being banned even though I have tried to change the format and follow the rules while repeatedly getting deleted. It is said that the company I write about is not "notable" nor does it contain any "significance" but I have seen other web based companies who do nothing notable or significant ex.shutterfly on Wikipedia and their articles have not been deleted so whats the problem? Honestly, how many web based companies are notable or significant? But I value your input. Please show me what I am doing different from other companies so that I might have success in posting my article. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torrelalexis (talk • contribs) 23:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I am taking your advice and building my case
Fair enough, I have read your references and understand you point of view regarding the deletion of my article. As it was pointed out in your "What about article x?" article, "Comparisons can be highly subjective, and so it is better to look at the debates in question and see what policies were cited and make an argument based on how they apply to the current debate." After reading both, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources articles I realize that I have enough to make a strong enough case to have the Izzyprints article restored. Unfortunately after only 2 attempts to edit an article I got this warning from another administrator "This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RT | Talk 22:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)"  The first and only warning I got before that was "Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines". I'd like to try to edit an article again and not get banned. What can be done about this? Also, how else can I prove to you that Izzyprints is a company that is "significant" to more than one million customers world wide? Any help would be appreciated.