User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 19

Headline text
Hello, Thank you for bringing my attention to the misuse. It is for sure no intentionally. Would it be ok if i add links under external links?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliaahussein (talk • contribs) 14:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay I'll finish the piece then submit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hudsonliberty (talk • contribs) 20:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

Tedford, Cody The article Tedford, Cody has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published[2] secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,[3] and independent of the subject.[4] ...not sure why you deleted?

I tried putting historical refrences in
But as I tried you deleted it. couldn't of you given more then 20 minutes

Why was connor s kidd deleted? Everything was true.

§==woolerball==

i see you have deleted the article on this sport and you claim it is not notable, well why is any sport notable and how many people have to play it to count as notable. i can tell you that many people do in fact play this sport and it is increasing in popularity throughout the united kingdom. So i suggest that it should be reinstated becuase you have clrearly deleted the article despite being too uniformed to make that decision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S0456769 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

yawpbox
In regards to the deletion of yawpbox, is there any direction that you can suggest that would assist in getting this up? I believe you were primarily deleting for not having notable sources, would this include magazine/newspaper articles about the significance of the site? thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imaginuity Stark (talk • contribs) 16:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC) thank you, I will compile those articles for upload

Supremecourtportrait
In regards to the speedy deletion of James cromartie, does the artist need to submit for free license and copyright agreement for the article to be accepted? Is he the only one who can create a new article? Can we now have a discussion to have the article verifiable, etc. I am not clear at all in how to use this TALK option to get questions answered. OK, I see the question is posted..... I understand G12 is a copyright issue.... how can it be remedied and is the article in a "protected" space for now? Please advise as how to proceed. Thanks.

"Attacks"
Spellcast is my friend. I talk to him, it's a joke. God, now I remember why I left Wikipedia. People need to lighten up and take a joke. --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 16:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

King Lear
You may need to protect King Lear some more - the Noche de Reyes vandal is back. This time he's. He's left a billet-doux on your user page. JohnCD (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Daniel J. Torres
I am not sure why the Daniel J. Torres page got deleted. I know as I wrote in the article he is still in high school but he has done major things to influence literally thousands of people. He started Yarmulke Day a day that supports peace and tolerance, it was written about by the Poughkeepsie Journal, and Daily Freeman. He also found out that the major sports chain Olympia Sports was selling school merchandise with out permission and saw to it that they donated the money. This affected an estimated 200 high schools thus meaning thousands of students, this was also documented in New Yorks oldest paper Poughkeepsie Journal. He also was voted the Top Ten Most Influential Under 20 In The Hudson-Valley by the Times Herald Record. I was not able to site that because it will be in Sunday’s paper and has yet to be printed. He is certainly relevant enough to have an article. So I don’t know if you have any suggestions on how I could have made it better so it wont be deleted next time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mantle536 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Mo supreme court
Stop deleting the entry "Better Courts for Missouri." The organization is in the process of developing its Wiki entry and cannot easily do that so long as you delete it every time it comes up. The organization is the subject of substantial news coverage in Missouri and is a 501(c)4 that is actively involved in Missouri politics.

Again, your cooperation would be appreciated as the organization is legitimate and interested in having a functional and helpful entry on this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mo supreme court (talk • contribs) 04:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Urban Townships
Category:Urban Townships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Orlady (talk) 04:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Advice
Hi there, you declined a speedy deletion nomination of mine for OUTTAKES & MISTAKE - A Dumb Video. I've read the guidelines and seen where I was going wrong. It's strange that some things that don't assert their significance can be nominated but others can't! Anyway, while I'm here could I ask what the policy is for user pages like this? It's written like an article. I guess that's fine, is it? Cheers, MSGJ (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
--lord kass (talk) 05:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect 'Beowulf and Grendel'
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 'Beowulf and Grendel', by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 'Beowulf and Grendel' is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 'Beowulf and Grendel', please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Many Thanks!
For watching my UP :-) --Piero Montesacro (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

This is Donnieur. Please recreate my New world pirate page as it is relevent to age of empires 3 because it is letting viewers know what clan thy should try to challange to have a fun and challaging game. I beg of you to please restore my page! Please if you also could make the title slots into sections as done on most pages. Please recreate my page. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnieur (talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Even though gaming clans are not considered important this clan is and is widly known in age of empires. people have wanted to know more about this clan and have gone to wikipedia to find no article exist. Also what is the harm with adding anothere article that will make wikipedia even more popular? Please put this The New World Pirates article back up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnieur (talk • contribs) 22:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

TripleME
Hi, FYI, it's reappeared. Strangely, this time it was created with the hangon template already in place. &mdash; BillC talk 00:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk page deletions
talk pages don't get deleted


 * User talk:Bullfights In Tijuana
 * User talk:VaughnJess
 * User talk:Seaworldpunk
 * User talk:Digital Movers LLC
 * User talk:BioSd
 * User talk:Yordanka
 * User talk:Jeggers2
 * User talk:CoDebris

From the last 24 hours, not including author requests, page moves, or IP pages.

--Calton | Talk 07:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Chuck fay
A tag has been placed on Chuck fay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Gongs" in silverchair article
The word "gong" is an australian term for award. Since silverchair are an australian group i think its is appopriate to use that expression. Espeically since what you changed it too (songs) makes no sence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.60.38.10 (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Balaraman
Recreated! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC) SO fast!!! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Mesa Riverview
Please see Deletion_review. Corvus cornix talk  18:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Moving Mountains
To clarify, I am in no way affiliated with the band. Last year, they recorded and released Pneuma independently, producing arguably one of the finest releases of the year in the post-rock genre. They have quickly risen to popularity, as demonstrated by their 150 000 plays on Last.fm (as a comparison, Justin Hayward has 40 000).

Right now, I can't guarantee that the band fulfills the notability criteria (unless reviews in major webzines qualify as non-trivial works), so I guess the article will have to wait.

That said, I don't see the purpose of deleting my disambiguation page, which also listed the album by The Casket Lottery. I sincerely doubt that more than a few percent of queries for "Moving Mountains" actually relate to the single article now available, so providing a more complete listing of uses should only be beneficial, regardless of whether the other uses qualify for individual pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esc4p1st (talk • contribs) 19:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Annandale United FC
Hello NawlinWiki. This article, which you recently deleted as an A7, has been recreated by its author. EdJohnston (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Eric J. Seidman wiki Deleted
NawlinWiki, my created article on screenwriter, sabermetrician, and magician Eric J. Seidman was speedily deleted because I did not know we needed to prove notability... I provided over 10 valid web-links as references to prove his notability and would like to get his wiki back up and running. Please help me to learn how to place notability tags or whatever is required in order to get his page back up and running. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejs5015 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Sorry, but we haven't made a thank you template yet (for voting). But thanks, anyway! Cheers,  Basketball 110  Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 23:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * There we go!  Basketball 110  Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 00:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Earth bending master  23:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Question about Speedy Deletion of Ocean Grove Record?
Hi NawlinWiki,

I see that this new article, contributed today by newbie User talk:Bilbobag was immediately nom for SD by you and deleted shortly thereafter. Not having seen the article before it was deleted, I don't know just how lacking it was as far as CSD A3 is concerned. But regarding CSD A7, I believe this is a long-established newspaper in Ocean Grove, New Jersey. If poorly written, shouldn't other editors have been given a chance to improve the article and/or comment at AfD, instead?  JGHowes talk  -  02:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Advice about the Kaneh Bosem article?
There is some speculation about the definition but apparently Hebrew University has deemed it to mean cannabis. Do I just have to make the article formatted like a regular definition or was it deleted because it's controversial?

Thanks/ Have a good one,

--TaylorOliphant (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I hope that all good things in life happen to you.--TaylorOliphant (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
ok .........i'm sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfsfstrefred (talk • contribs) 15:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Indian Liberal Right
This is about the fourth time this guy has created this unsourced odd little "article"/essay/manifesto under various spelling variants. Do you feel it doesn't quality for a speedy as no-context? -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  16:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of CreateNewPage
Hi, I am a new User, and may not have come to grips with all the controls and terminology. I was trying to write a page called The Silly Point, but I couldn't find how to create the Title. I accidentally clicked the save button instead of the show preview. It got published before it was complete.

You made a speedy deletion on grounds of non-notability.

I would like to mention why this site should be considered as a notable site.

1. This is the only non-BBC site that has been accepted by the BBC Sports TestMatchSpecial page as a Related Site and Link http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/tms/ (on the right sidebar near the bottom).

2. It is also recognised by an independent website, the Indian news portal http://rambhai.com (on the right sidebar) as a Friend of Rambhai. This was due to the quality of articles being posted.

3. This is probably the only cricket board that is truly multinational, as it now has members from every single ICC full-member nations. This is difficult to prove, but is a certainly a very significant and a rare feature.

4. This site has a cricket-only search engine. This probably the only such searchengine for cricket, but is difficult to prove.

I am writing this for your reconsideration, rather than putting up the page again. The other points I would request you to consider are:

1. This is an amateur site, with no commercial interest and has promised to continue as a non-commercial site.

2. Wikipedia has a page to describe Web 2.0, this is a true example of one.

This is a site that aims to unite cricket fans from all cricket playing nations through interactions on the web, through two different platforms, the discussion forum and the blogspages.

Sports is meant to unite and not divide, and that is what this site aims to achieve.

3. Wikipedia has accepted cricketwatchdogs.com's page. That is a commercial site, that wants publicity to increase its revenue. It had started as a site to generate a hate campaign, and then to tap into the commercial market changed its name. The publication of its change of name on news sites is its evidence of notability, not its quality. The Silly Points have gained recognition for being a site of quality.

I request again for this page to be reconsidered.

If any changes are necessary, I am perfectly happy to do so.

Regards Awmyth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awmyth (talk • contribs) 20:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

One Fine Day!
I am curious as to why the site was pulled down again in the middle of an edit. The original reason for the site deletion had been due to "a lack of notability" which had been rectified with the latest update that included 2 new sources from outside the "local" area and it included links to articles that could not be previously verified. The show is not just a "YouTube" or "Local" show as it is broadcast on a network that reaches over 3,500 campuses in the US alone, the Open Student Television Network.

I respectfully request that this article please be reconsidered.

-Fkick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fkick (talk • contribs) 03:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for One Fine Day!
An editor has asked for a deletion review of One Fine Day!. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Fkick (talk) 03:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Fkick

The Silly Point:
Please refer to my message above. This is in continuation of the instructions on my talk page. I have re-submitted the entry (originally submitted in error as Create new page) This is the final version with entries and references as to its notability. I request you to approve its notability. If you suggest further changes to make it acceptable, I will be happy to comply. Regards Awmyth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awmyth (talk • contribs) 11:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Manimal (band)
I started an article yesterday about Manimal, a French metal band from Toulouse, which was deleted before I had time to finish it. The reason stated was that the article "failed to demonstrate the significance" of the band. This is quite odd, as I had, in this very article, remarked that the band was classified under a sub-genre that was created, named, and pioneered by the band itself, and a few other bands of the area.

This page about Siebenbürgen has even less information than my page on Manimal did, and, rather than being forerunners of a genre of music, Siebenbürgen's music is decisively set in predefined styles - tell me, which is more significant, and which article relays (or rather, relayed) the band's significance more?

Though it is not my place to admonish an admin, I would request that you be a little more thoughtful before you cackhandedly delete articles that hold/could hold some importance. If the band is good enough for fr.wikipedia.org, why is it less so for en.wikipedia.org?

I am now going to recreate the page, and add more than I did last time. Though you may see even the band as insignificant, there are many who would disagree with you. Thedragon5000

Mens Rea Band
Mens Rea Band has been recreated again. Just a head's up. Regards -  Jd 027  chat 17:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Amit Kumar (doctor) deletion
I was wondering if this article warranted deletion. I wonder about your action because the person, who is wanted in a multi-billion international kidney scandal, has recently been nabbed. Your thoughts? Regards, Mspraveen (talk) 05:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:X1
OK, now I'm confused. Looked like vandalism, but what's that page all about? GBT/C 13:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Deaf Pedestrians
Of course, it's fine. Thanks for telling me. You're far more experienced than me than this and I'm sure you know far better :) All the best, -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 18:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

should this user be deleted?
Since my own user area was deleted by NawlinWiki, I immediately thought of coming here to ask if the following user should be allowed at Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seedplanter

Ottawahitech (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion of ISG Solutions
trying to figure out all the rules (understand that there are many). regarding the speedy deletion of ISG Solutions. I am trying to use other software company listings that aren't marked as a guide to listing this one. I am unclear about the notabiliy rule. If we are listing in a company directory doesn't it have to be about a company?? Is there something you can steer me to that would explain this further? Any help would be appreciated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AmyYaley AmyYaley (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 19:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion of ISG Solutions
Understood that Wiki isn't a company directory. However, there is a category with that heading. So I am unclear as to where the line is drawn. Thank you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AmyYaley AmyYaley (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 19:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

rob and katie
could you please explain to me how i did not show that rob and katie are significant to our community in my last edit? THANKS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robandkatie (talk • contribs) 19:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild
Thanks for moving the article. Gerhard51 (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Gorgeous Dre
I noticed that you deleted the page that I was attempting to create about the life of Andre L. Taylor. YES he is a real person and there are several notable reasons that he should be added to Wikipedia. I am new to this site in terms of adding information to this site. I attempted to save my information in an attempt to add more information to the page. To my surprise, the page was deleted before I could return to add more information. With the amount of detailed information that I included (including websites and references) I find it very impossible that you were able to read that information and deem this page to be deleted. I ask you to NOT delete this page until I am done creating it. At that point, you can read the page in it's entirety and make a better determination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CreoleGQ (talk • contribs) 22:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Gorgeous Dre Part 2
ONCE AGAIN.... read what I am saying...... Andre L. Taylor AKA "Gorgeous Dre" starred in the movie "American Pimp." If you search for "American Pimp" on Wikipedia, you will see that his name is in the credits of this film. Not to glorify "pimping," but he was very instrumental in that movie being made. He was a lead consultant and a key person in recruiting the others who took part in this movie. He faced Federal Prison and turned his life around to be a life coach. He wrote a book about his life and appeared on Montel Williams. So if you want to discuss notability, do a search for "American Pimp." Everything that makes that article "notable" will make Andre Taylor's article notable. As a matter of fact, I was in the process of obtaining that information while YOU deleted my article.

If you would have taken time to READ the biography, you would have seen multiple references and websites that support everything that was being reported. I was also in the process of gathering more information before YOU deleted the article. Again, before you delete an article, take time to read in it's entirety and/ or send me a message to verify anything you may not understand. Most importantly, allow me a window to complete my article so that you can see all my references and notable information.

I can care less about your opinion as to whether or not he is "important" or "notable" enough to be on Wikipedia. I can name many people on Wikipedia who are known for less. I am simply trying to report information that IS legitimate, people WANT to read, and CAN be easily verified. If you like, I can give you the phone number to his manager- if you need more proof that this information is accurate. Perhaps you'd like to talk to him yourself.

It is one thing if I'm submitting this information in an incorrect format. If I am, then perhaps you can make some more effective suggestions to properly submit my article. By the way, I already read the "Help" section so there is no need to send me any links.

It is another thing to delete my article because of YOUR opinion.

In any event, if you continue to delete this information, I will contact Wikipedia under grounds of harrrasment and discrimination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CreoleGQ (talk • contribs) 01:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted due to...?
You ignorant fool! Why was the Michael Courts article deleted? Not only did that take a lot of time to write, it was factually accurate and interesting. It 'lacked biographical relevance' or whatever, that someones relative you twat. I'll tell you what lacks not relevance, but logic; this website.

The internet is free to express whatever. If this is a free encyclopedia, then it is open to anything, it is a peoples encyclopedia. If I want to find out straight forward facts, I'll look in the Macmillan or Britannica Encyclopedia (lets face it, they're more factually correct than this site). The Admin rules on this site confuse me. What gives you the power to mess with facts when you can't be objective? Twat —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.241.162 (talk) 09:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The Five Pillars (MMORPG)
Damn you are fast! And thanks for respecting the hangon tag that are described as procedure for these cases...

I find it strange that similar pages has been allowed for years, and that every reference to this is deletes promptly.

Also it is strange that the following exits when not being open for other than the "selected few"
 * List_of_multiplayer_browser_games
 * WikiProject_Massively_multiplayer_online_games
 * Category:Massively multiplayer online games
 * Category:Massively multiplayer online role-playing games
 * Category:Massively multiplayer online real-time strategy games

This should be added to all games that fall under the category of a massively multiplayer online real-time strategy game.

I really hope you will reconsider.

Olav Bringedal (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Shopit.com - you did not even give me a chance to finish it. But it is def wikipedia worthy. Please check out theses links (the ones I was going to cite but did not have time to).

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/141724/widgets_that_wow.html

http://mashable.com/2008/01/24/9-facebook-applications-to-make-you-money/

Please reconsider the deletion. If you have any questions or comments please let me know as well.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjohn9 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Autism and AS vandalism
I'm out the door and don't have time to followup, thanks for the autism vandal block. There's another one at Asperger syndrome, can you look into that? thanks, Sandy Georgia (Talk) 19:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Timesand Deletion
Hi, my page has been deleted, under A7 tag. Something about not important and not specified origin for photos.; All photos and coverart are created by the band, and the band is one of the few best bands in the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timesand (talk • contribs) 04:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Question about Deletion and Submission Criteria
Greetings. I saw the notice on my talk page about my articles being deleted on the grounds that they were promoting my work. I'm not sure I understand the objection. These articles were not advertisements, they were informational articles. Many authors have their books in Wikipedia and this does indeed promote them in the sense that they increase public awareness of the author's work. That is all I was trying to accomplish. Can you explain in more detail what you mean by "promotion" so I can understand why certain articles are forbidden? Sincerely, CW --Cyberwatt (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2008 (EST)

fun over at Disney articles
There has been a slightly escalating revert war on the Walt Disney World property pages, culminating in this morning's comment of "...YOU IDIOT..." in the article notes by Miamiboyzinhere aimed at Malpass93. I started a discussion item on this over at Talk:Disney%27s_Hollywood_Studios to try to halt the rv over rv, but at least one party doesn't want to discuss options. The various articles include Epcot, Magic Kingdom, etc. SpikeJones (talk) 16:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

SHOPIT PAGE

Thanks for getting back to me on how to write a page. This is one my first times on wikipedia so I am new exactly what tone an article has to be written in. If you get a chance please check out Shopit, I did my best. I am having trouble getting the references to show properly when viewing the page as an "article" as opposed to when in "edit this page". Thanks again.

Barfield, Inc.
Hi -- would you take a look at Barfield, Inc., which the creator has re-created. I am tempted to tag it as spam (as I did the previous version)...thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 20:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hooton 3 Car
Please put the article about that band into a normal deletion discussion. As you can see from the article the band made three albums, further a compilation and a handfull of singles. Thank you very much. Simplicius (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Please inform me where I can ask for a restore. Simplicius (talk) 23:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Deletion review is at Deletion review. But that may not be necessary -- if this band has been recognized as notable (see WP:BAND) by reliable independent sources, then add those sources and feel free to repost the article.  NawlinWiki (talk) 03:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC) (from User_talk:Simplicius)


 * Please can you tell me how I can "repost" an article that was deleted?
 * Actually this this the reason why I asked you for a restore and as the case may be a normal deletion discussion Simplicius (talk) 10:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * How to repost: just post the article again. The title isn't protected. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)(from User_talk:Simplicius)


 * Sorry, I do not have the text. I am not an admin. I cannot look into the contents of a deleted version. This is the reason why I ask you. Simplicius (talk) 13:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I've posted the deleted text to your userspace at User:Simplicius/Hooton 3 Car. Again, please don't repost to the main article space unless you add the sources you mentioned. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)(from User_talk:Simplicius)

PS: What is the exact reason for the deletion? Simplicius (talk) 11:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Simplicius (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Veganadam
HALP!!! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Stallion Media
I do not understand why this has been deleted. reveille and endomol both large indepent production companys have pages. i am just informing people of televison programs we are involved in ugly betty, the office etc etc. i believe that people may want to no who makes there fav program. esp after the writer strike is now over. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowej003 (talk • contribs) 22:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

WWBN.com
The redirects I made such as LiveVideoService are trademarks owned by WWBN issued by the USPTO.gov. And I thought they should be redirected to the article. I think the article should be moved to WWBN as it is the main trademark for it. Thank you very much. morako (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

End of the Line (MUD)
Hi NawlinWiki, I'm not sure why you deleted this page for not being "notable." Several users of this MUD and myself were in the process of creating content for the page when you deleted it. I think in the future you should check when a page was created and not delete it within 2 minutes of its creation. If you might have read the content or waited just a couple of minutes, it might have become apparent to you why this particlar MUD is "notable." Just to appease your concerns, it so happens that End of the Line is both one of the oldest (perhaps even _the_ oldest) LPMUD currently still in existence. In fact, it may be one of the older MUDs in existence altogether. If you read the Wikipedia page on BatMUD, that is a claim of their own notability that they make. Furthermore, there are actually academic works that cite this particular MUD (e.g. "Cultural Formations in Text-Based Virtual Realities" by Elizabeth Reid; text at http://www.ludd.luth.se/mud/aber/articles/cult-form.thesis.html) which I think also add to this MUD's notability. If it pleases you, we are going to recreate the page and we would like to hope that it will stay. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmckinne (talk • contribs) 04:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Hello again, I'm not sure how I can "cite sources showing the MUD's notability" beyond what I just posted. There is no way for me to "cite" the fact that the MUD was created in 1989. It is simply just a fact. You can certainly go to the MUD's outdated website at http://www.eotl.org, where this information is as well. I'm guessing that you aren't a user or player of MUDs, so again, it might be difficult for me to extol the particular virtues of this MUD that make it particularly notable. However, for at least historical reasons this MUD has a significant relevance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmckinne (talk • contribs) 04:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Addendum: this may provide some notability: http://www.mudconnect.com/motm/motm-0398.html. Thanks.

Another Nede sock
A page you deleted, My Mate Mick, has been recreated by Macintoshrules with editing by BarbieGirl1 and 119.11.32.140. The user on 119.11.32.140 is asking for an administrator to redirect Daniel Montana to the page. Given the history of Daniel Montana and My Mate Mick this looks like a Nede sock. Ttwaring (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Adam Straith
Everything stated in that article is true and can be proven. If you look on his profile on http://www.canadasoccer.com/eng/nationals/profile.asp?playerid=260&sub=3 it will say everything I had previously put down on Wikipedia. I demand you put down the nomination of deletion or let me re-create the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooleo43 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

dnvrfantj
That IP address vanalized Respiration again. He needs to be blocked. --Dnvrfantj (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Sick 'em? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Charlie Don't Surf (song)
Please, check the revision history of Charlie Don't Surf (song) and Articles for deletion/Charlie Don't Surf (song) out (and the article too). —P Joe F. (talk • contribs) 00:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for moving - and I was wondering why it doesn't work. --Marcel1984 talk 10:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

29 years.
I bet otherwise. A few possibilities: 1. Wikipedia doesn't exist by then; 2. The vandal forgot his password; 3. Middle age straightened him out. ;) · AndonicO  Hail!  19:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of CeraSport and CeraLyte
Hello Nawlin:

I am not an employee of this company. I have been away since I added these articles. My first article about this company was approved as should its other aspects. See Talk:Cera_Products. Coke, Pepsi, Gatorade Powerade all have a presence. All their research is in-house reseach. What Cera Products offers has been academically proven in peer review journals and is used in the medical field. Gatorade and powerade have not and are not recomended by physicians. These articles are worthy of being published in Wikipedia because, the product has been scientifically proven and it is an evolution of high quality natural health products for rehydration.

I would appreicated if you would please send me the text that was deleted so I may restructure it so it can be acceptable. Thank you

User_talk:Jabaker75 —Preceding comment was added at 20:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

CAT:CSD work
Could I please request your attention to a discussion here about the appropriateness of some speedy deletions you have recently made. Note that the discussion is not intended to be critcal of your actions in any way. I myself made some of the same deletions before I started to second guess myself over them. - TexasAndroid (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank You
User_talk:Jabaker75 —Preceding comment was added at 21:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Hatred metal band deleted
I saw that the artical is notable if band placed or won some festivals or something. It is a little confusing. Can you please explane it? Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youndivian (talk • contribs) 17:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of BioTrove
In regards to the speedy deletion of the BioTrove page, we have the information ready to add to the article. It took longer than we anticipated. If you could re-instate the article, we would post our information immediately.

Biotrove (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you help?
Since you deleted my page on the artist Tripp Harrison, can you help me get it up to par? Maybe a few tips so I can get it as a viable article?

Thanks, Any help would be appreciated.

Asdfaeou36 (talk) 21:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

TrimWater
What makes this non-notable as opposed to Red Rain energy drink? All the article does is provide information just as mine does —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sugarisbad (talk • contribs) 21:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Damian Foxall
Wow. It hardly took 15 seconds before you deleted the page as "not notable". Give a guy a chance would you! Wotapalaver (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know how to create an article, so the first thing was to have somewhere to put the content. Stop deleting things before there's even a chance to finish one sentence. Wotapalaver (talk) 16:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Dolphin_67
We had tried to create an article about a new technology must known: before putting on the lines we have carefully navigated the wikipedia coming across several of similar case; unfortunately those article obviously are contanining direct reference to who and why. Than let us know how a good way to get the article viable. Maybe a good practice for who is in charge of.dolphin_67 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletor
You delete them before I can finish tagging them! I'm just gonna go back to bed, then! ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Anders Ohm
It's back. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ...children... - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Congrats on beating cluebot...
...on the Battlefield 2 article, first time I've seen any human user achieve such feat...or maybe you're not human after all --BirdKr (talk) 21:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hm, would explain alot... ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Katrinalaya
I was working on this article and still am. I just started on the article and I was going to continue it. It has only been.. probably a few seconds since I started it. I have a lot more information I have to put. I assume that you're going to soon tell me to use the Sandbox if I want to "practice". Fine, I will. I just wanted to let you know, though. --Xxhopingtearsxx (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, okay.. By the way, did you evacuate from Hurricane Katrina or stay like I did?--Xxhopingtearsxx (talk) 21:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

robert.moore.j
you deleted my new page about vroooom technology this is absolutely ridiculous!!!!! why cant i create a page that defines or tells the history of a company and its involvement in the community???!!!!! microsoft has one! home depote has one! "wikipedia" has one! sears has one! whats the problem!!!!!!!????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert.moore.j (talk • contribs) 21:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Timur Ibragimov‎
Please explain your revert of my edits. thank you.--Stick Negative (talk) 21:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Geovative Solutions
This company is important and significant because they provide GeoTours, which is a highly useful software used by consumers and businesses all over the world for GPS tours (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gps_tour), and is the only software of its kind. I cited Garmin (the world's top GPS manufacturer) and GPS World (an authority on GPS), which legitimizes the article as notable. It's a rapidly-growing company in an industry that's taking off. The article deserves a place on Wikipedia.

GeoTours is what makes Geovative Solutions notable, important and significant, and GeoTours is described in the article. What more are you looking for to indicate why Geovative Solutions is important or significant? Ununtrium (talk) 13:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Archive/1
Hi nawlin,

As far as i can see, Archive/1 was not a redirect, but rather a wrongly archived page. Maybe it was switched reference because i was trying to move it to JAF1970/Archive/1, but it came up empty. Any chance you can undelete it, and move it there instead? Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 14:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you, seems like the user figured it went wrong, as he blanked the page just after the move. I restored that problem now. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 14:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Under construction tag
Your welcome! Happy editing ;-) --JD554 (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Smeagel54
Michael D. Burnes was created again. Instead of AIAV ing it i think ill just drop you a personal note since you are involved :) Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 18:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Cenarth Fox
Cenarth Fox, playwright Australia page was speedily deleted in January but I have only just found this out. This working playwright is notable in his own country and is now becoming known in the UK, with over 40 plays and musicals to his name. He may not yet be in the same league as Lloyd-Webber or Shakepeare, but then, who is? Could the page be reinstated so that notability references can be added in support of it please? He could also be included on the list of contemporary playwrights. (I hope I've done this entry right as I've not had to do this Talk page edit before. My apologies if I have got it wrong.) Anne (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Docwras

Joel Smernoff
Hi. You marked Joel Smernoff's page as unsourced or poorly sourced contropversial claims. I am wondering what specifically was either.

MikeBush79 (talk) 22:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Just A Smile


WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. - Warthog Demon  22:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you.
For blocking that IP address, though it is only temporarily. Do you suppose if, when he comes back, he continues to vandalize pages, he'll have to be blocked indefinately? Here, in case you don't know which one I mean, wait one second... Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

This one here. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Request for image deletion
Hi there! Can you help me to delete image? I was about to upload this image into Wikimedia Commons, but accidentally I upload it here!! So please delete it...--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 06:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Haj Baba khan Ardabili
Someone keeps re-creating this. I think the users have been different each time, but not being an admin I can't check the history of the deleted versions. Can you salt this particular title? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 10:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

CARDJETT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardjett (talk • contribs) 16:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC) I want to know what you feel falls under advertising? I wrote an overview article of a company called CLS Plasticard and it took you less than 30 minutes to delete it for advertsing. There was nothing in the article "selling" the company. It was simply a history of the company. Please tell me what in that article you felt was wrong.

Test Page
The page is not "patent nonsense", it is about a real living person and I would appreciate a moment to finish what I was trying to do, thank you. (Csbarrett talk. —Preceding comment was added at 18:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

How do I get my page back? (Csbarrett talk.

You are on one heck of a power trip man. All you have to do is scroll through one page of your user talk to see that you like deleting things before anyone gets a chance to make a "user-created" encylopedia entry. Do you have any idea how much crap you could be fixing on Wikipedia, and instead you are "wasting your time" heckling me over a project that has merit. What if I created a NawlinWiki page and discussed your editing history? Just because you are not a public figure does not mean you arent worth knowing about.

I used the Vinny Paul page as a template and was in the middle of editing it when you deleted it. I would appreciate some time to finish what I was trying to do, thank you. User:Csbarrett talk.

Sorry bout the other day.--Csbarrett (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Anders Ohm
That AndersOhm created a page again called Anders Ohm that specifically mentioned you. I suggest, as you have suggested, that he be blocked indefinitely. --Belinrahs (talk) 23:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Never mind, already done indefinitely. --Belinrahs (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Henslee57 (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC) can u explain to me what i need to do to publish Guerilla Marketing Talk Radio I dont want to waste time and i need some guidance can u advise me

Londonderry
Please could you undo your page move from Londonderry (disambiguation) to Londonderry. I would do do myself but a minor page edit prevents this. There is a longstanding but messy compromise that Derry and Londonderry about the city should point to Derry and that County Derry and County Londonderry about the county should point to County Londonderry. If this does not happen the issue of the name of the city will be reopened, with some arguing that since the official name of the city is "Londonderry", the city's page should be at Londonderry; that would not produce a productive debate, and the quickest way to avoid it is to restore the redirect from Londonderry to Derry while returning the disambiguation page to Londonderry (disambiguation). --Rumping (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the speed of your response--Rumping (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Nothing Left to Lose band
Delete and salt? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * SALT!!! :( - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Nothing Left to Lose
Nothing Left To Lose, Nothing left to lose, Nothing Left to lose... except my MIND. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:DmanXdecy
Not sure what to do in this case. . . take a look at this talkpage: User talk:DmanXdecy. Either someone is using their account as a form of self promotion or mistaking the talk page as a sandbox. I can't tell which. - Warthog Demon  20:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Hold tag does not seem to help
Regarding a recent deletion on "Richard Bushey": I placed a hold tag after I saw it flagged for speedy deletion, and added Talk text to explain why it should not be deleted, and to ask for clarification as to why it was flagged (the help page did not help). However, 20 minutes later, both the page and the talk text was gone. What's the point of giving us rules for how to prevent a deletion if you are going to delete the page anyway? The page in question was for Richard Bushey, a graphics artists who has contributed tons of graphics works to the Open Source community. Why was his page deleted? What do I need to do to stop the deletions? Bill Catambay 22:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of SHARPcast (podcast)
Regarding a recent deletion of the noted article. I did put in some notable information such as it was the first video podcast on technology to be started in Canada by young people, 14 years of age. I also did put in a little bit of the history listed in SHARPcast's website and I also put in some examples of topics they have already done. I am wondering what else could I have done to make this story "notable" under your standards? Hgzl (talk) 08:41, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Edit: The page was also tagged with an under-construction tag immediately after creation by me and within a day of creation it was deleted, I am also wondering what is the point of making a page if it would just get deleted before you can really add much more details later?Hgzl (talk) 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello again, I am wondering if you could at least reply to my question. It sure didn't take you this long t delete my article. Question was: I am wondering what else could I have done to make this story "notable" under your standards? Thanks Hgzl (talk) 07:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Why do you hate us all, our story was a great civilization story and would cure the world of all moody adolescents. it was a story of what sex, drug, and addiction can do to you as the prostitiutue badger demonstrated. I hope you will send our story back to us as it would teach the world a great deal. and as for your homepage... YOU SICK SICK person... I cannot believe you would say that... i will get the police on you if you do not give us it back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GRRRRRRR —Preceding unsigned comment added by ShroomLovers (talk • contribs) 11:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Nien-Ling Wacker
Hi... I am a rather slow typer. And kind slow at gathering up all the references. How about at least waiting 24 hrs before submitting it for deletion if it's still doesn't meet criteria for notability or spam. Thank you. --Frogcat (talk) 17:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks for at least moving the draft article over to my namespace. --Frogcat (talk) 17:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

________ You!
You deleted my files! I will hunt you down!! ___ You!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BluWare (talk • contribs) 03:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

DEFCON, Inc. deletion
The reason for posting the description of the Company is that there is constant confusion with the Hacker Convention, the video game, etc.

There has been a link in the disambiguation page to clarify this fact, but there is no internal link for the reference from that page.

Thus, the need for a separate listing with a very small bit of elaboration to distinguish the Corporation from the Convention, from the Game, etc.

Suggestions? Thanks! --Giantstep (talk) 12:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

ATEasy deletion
Why deleted? LabView and HP VEE are similar pages for other programming languages! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrATEasy (talk • contribs) 13:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Stupid Deletion?
Why did you delete the page WikiSims even though it was tagged: 16:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:schoolblock
FYI, according to the template documentation, it should not be subst'ed, in case the details change. -- Zsero (talk) 17:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

HI
I represent Anderson Law offices in Chicago,IL. This is for a profile you have worked on Tony Accarado Jr.My client is Tony Accarado JR. I have trying to get hold of your real name. You can call me at my cell 708-345-1456. OR you can e-mail me at yogachick2003@yahoo.com. My name is Sarah Rosmito Please get back to me quick Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.203.136.247 (talk • contribs) 13:30, February 29, 2008


 * Blocked for legal threat. See response at User talk:192.203.136.247. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, how was that a threat? The block seems improvident to me. -- Zsero (talk) 20:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What history? The article has been deleted, with all its history, so I can't look at it, but I have no doubt that this was properly done for good and just reasons, as you have explained.  Nor can I see any reason to believe that Harlempanther187 posted the comment above.  But the main point is that this comment, whether it was made by Harlempanther187 or not, is not a legal threat, and is not an offense at all let alone a blockable one.  -- Zsero (talk) 20:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

What The Rubbish?
Did I somehow recreate the article? - Warthog Demon  21:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Odd. A bug perhaps? Usually what happens is I get a message saying it's deleted and would I like to recreate it. O_o - Warthog Demon  21:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Note
I left some comments at the link above, and felt you should be aware of them. Note that I believe that your action is in good faith, and well-meant, but I would have rathered seen the discussion continue. Also, note that I hadn't yet responded to those who asked questions. (searching links takes time...)
 * User talk:Riana

Anyway, have a good day. - jc37 21:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Just so you know...
You're a fiend with tackling new pages patrol/vandal blocking. :P Cheers =) -- slakr  \ talk / 22:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Greg (Greggy) Miller
I don't see what is inappropriate about the article. I have 4 references and the facts are all true. After checking all guidelines I seem to have met all of them. Please tell me why this has been deleted, and how I could possibly make it better.

(Dwreiss (talk) 23:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC))

User:BluWare
Just wanted you to be aware that the above mentioned user is making personal attacks on you on his userpage. I removed them, he restored them and chewed me out on my talkpage. Dethme0w (talk) 03:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)