User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 22

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

Deletion ?
A video music award, 3 released albums, 2 of them under licenced of EMI, sponsored by reebok and srv music...am i not to worth to be on wikipedia..you deleted it while i was editting..you have hayko cepkin,i am his bass player?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onursengul (talk • contribs) 19:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

"Also, don't start articles with ads for other website" what adds? i dont even add a link??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onursengul (talk • contribs) 19:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

revision: i dont know what annon talk is, its just a header when i start wikipedia, just like wikimaina...maybe you just check it out.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onursengul (talk • contribs) 19:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete the pspsex.net entry. It has every right to exist if http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veoh and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouPorn and dozen other ones are on there. The sites are even on the same list in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_services and each one has a wiki. Whats your problem with pspsex.net? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitx (talk • contribs) 18:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Bad Deletion
I just created a page, Conner Drennen, which you deleted while I was trying to find a picture to go with the article. I am very angry, and ask that you not delete that page again without my permission. Besteditor713 (talk) 01:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Precydent
Maybe you deleted our page. if the reference are not good please see for example: http://caselines.blogspot.com/2008/04/precydent-impresses-advance-in-legal.html Could you send the old page that the user "FreeLaw" add in wikipedia and send to devteam[at]precydent.com, please? We also like some comments. Is there a way to find anyone who write about PreCYdent Search Engine?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.3.100.212 (talk) 10:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Pineapple Guru
You have continually deleted this page despite the fact that they are an integral part of the current underground music scene in Seattle. Please stop. This page is being added to make wikipedia more complete. You clearly do not share this interest with us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Illbeyourman (talk • contribs) 05:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Nafion and Hydrion
Please do not delete these items from wikipedia. Nafion has been invented in the 1960's by walther grot and Hydrion was invented last year by the son of Walther Grot. Stephen Grot. These items are commonly used in today's fuel cell research industry and are manufactured by various companies. I am also new to wikipedia as far as adding words so I dont know the criteria for how long an article should be. Etc etc.

R.e. Bloobu deletion
Please do not delete this page as this article is as relevant as the netvibes, igoogle, my yahoo pages.

Thanks

Please delete
Hi, you recently edited a page which I created about "Manon Dave". It seems that all of the information in the "TV & Film Music" section is incorrect. The subject of the article, himself, has emailed Wikipedia asking for this to be resolved, but since you are Admin, I was hoping you could delete this section?

All the credits linking him to these projects have now been removed from IMDb and TV.com.

Many thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karolinadawson (talk • contribs) 19:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the help on my talk page. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk page
Hi, I'm penny loo and you've just deleted my article titled : 73 Petaling Scouts Troop. Its stated that wiki doesn't host any companies, clubs and etc. but its also noted that organisations that are famous enough can be added. This is my first Wiki article, and its really a popular search request, its about a scouts troop in Malaysia. In Malaysia, Scout groups are not clubs or organisations (open groups) but rather attached to the schools as part of their uniform body, therefore, the troop article will be relevant for at least a 100 more years. Next year the 73 petaling Scouts troop will turn 20 (years). Its patron school is SMK Damansara Utama which is also a wiki article. around 200 ppl join this troop yearly, by now after 20 years, at least 10000+ ppl are from this troop, as much as PricewaterhouseCoopers (accounting firm) employess in total in South East Asia for which an article is also dedicated to. So i request for the "73 Petaling Scouts Troop" article be re-instated. Btw this troop gets an article too Oreland Boy Scout Troop 1...Thank You.

I found and added something to my talk page that may come in handy for new page patrol -- if you think it's worthwhile, I recommend following the same procedure I used and asking its creator for permission. I'm told it works very well -- I'll see. Accounting4Taste: talk 17:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Trying to understand why you deleted The Adventures of Pachuko Boy??? I read your reasoning but do not understand how it applies to this particular entry.--Ryanreeves (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll clean it up. dang that was the toned down version as well. :)--Ryanreeves (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I would like to know that the article of Giglablast is same as my artilce of Palkey. I would like to enlist Palkey into wikipedia, what should I do? Its a part of my university project. Please guide me. Mshabaz —Preceding comment was added at 18:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

provides reference to palkey domain & is a site palkey provides its free service, you may check  for all the domain names that provides reference back to Palkey.com Besides this:  also provides reference. Please help me, I need to have some info on this site. [User:Mshabaz|Mshabaz]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mshabaz (talk • contribs) 18:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Why speedy delete OMAC Industries, I wouldn't have bothered if it wasn't notable. I provided references and links to the two other articles connected to it. I understand that it was only a stub(only two paragraphs), but why delete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AP3 10 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I attempted to start a page for an indie New York musician, Amanda Halsey, a singer/songwriter and cited two verifiable sources. I will not keep attempting if this is going to be deleted. I am not advertising for her, etc. I am merely a fan trying to post info about her. Please help. --Rosencranz (talk) 18:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, but just to note, I was citing was was written on last.fm, not advertising her. I will do my research on articles and news sources to add to her article. She's a great artist and I shall do my best to make her entry acceptable. Thank you. --Rosencranz (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The information on Memories of Worth Ranch is about the 75 years of the camp. The money from the book goes to the Worth Ranch Museum. I don't understand why it was deleated. Maurice Lambert —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.65.208.184 (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

American Drug War links

 * "Please stop adding advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Joe Arpaio. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you insert advertising or a spam link, as you did to James P. Gray, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)"


 * All of the entries that I have edited are of people who volunteered to appear in American Drug War, many of whom are personal friends with the director, Kevin Booth. The subject of the documentary is relevant to their careers and the information on their pages.  Please let me know if I'm free to put the links back on the relevant articles.  - talk:EndTheDrugWar


 * "If someone is a prominent cast member in the film, such as Tommy Chong, that fact can be mentioned (as it is in the Chong article -- the film is on his list of appearances). But adding an external link to the film to each cast member's article is just spamming, pure and simple. So no, don't re-add the links. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)"


 * Have you seen the documentary? Tommy Chong is featured just as much as the other people who's entries I edited.  Arpaio actually has more screen time than Chong! There are probably over 40 people in the film with Wikipedia entries... I've only added links to maybe 5-10 of them. -talk:EndTheDrugWar


 * Well, then discuss that in the text of the Arpaio article, and link to the Wikipedia article on the film, not to the film's external site. That's the part that's spamming ==


 * Cool, thanks, I've taken note! I'm new here... -talk:EndTheDrugWar


 * On James Gray's page, I can't edit the main description for some reason, just the external links section. Is it okay to add an internal link to the ADW Wiki page in the external links section?  Also, is there any other way to message Wikipedia users without posting on a page like this?  Thanks again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EndTheDrugWar (talk • contribs) 19:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The only edit button I see is next to the external link header and when I click it, the only thing I can edit is the external links. Is there a hidden way to edit the top portion of the entry? EndTheDrugWar (talk) 19:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you clicking "edit this page" at the TOP of the page? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Aha! Duh... Again, pardon my ignorance, I'm new here.   I just saw the edit links on the side and didn't realize there was one at the top.  Thanks for fixing that for me!  EndTheDrugWar (talk) 19:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * No prob. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

The Gathering
NawlinWiki, I have recreated The Gathering (church) entry with outside sources to verify notability. I request you review the page and let me know if this meets requirements. If it does not meet requirements, please explain to me why The Gathering (church) entry is not notable but a church entry like Piney Grove United Methodist Church apparently is. Thank you. --Daparnell (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

To whom it may concern,

Please desist from deleting my article in relation to an Australian First.

If you must remove the business name or call it business X then that would be fine.

The article has been uploaded for the benefit of you readers and not for the purposes of advertising.

Kind Regards, Mark Leith

You were mentioned in passing in a Slate blog
You reverted a bit of vandalism to an article that got noticed

Just thought you might like to know since I just happened to notice it. Erechtheus (talk) 03:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for this. Have a nice day :) A Vand talkcontribs 12:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Casey Aldridge
Hi. It would be very nice from you if at least you could explain me why did you reverted my edition which included a request for deleting it. Anyway, I'll leave a message here. Thanks for your time. ---Epiovesan (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for One Fine Day!
An editor has asked for a deletion review of One Fine Day!. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ofd2008 (talk) 17:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Shenton
Seriously, someone should salt this page. It has been deleted seven or eight times now. Could you do this?  STORMTRACKER   94  Go Irish! 19:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks.  STORMTRACKER   94  Go Irish! 19:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

BLOCK
We need to block user: 24.196.51.194 because he/she is adding unnessary things in the talk pages and is vandalising. He/She has been temporarily blocked for more than two times so why can't we block him/her forever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooncrest (talk • contribs) 20:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Is there anything else we can do? Mooncrest (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment. What is the longest you can block a IP user? Mooncrest (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This is kinda out of subject but can you archive my talk page? Thx. Mooncrest (talk) 20:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC) My talk page got messed up!!! I'm no good at this -_-". Sorry for bothering you again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooncrest (talk • contribs) 20:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!Mooncrest (talk) 20:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Another Salt?
Pillars of Literacy has been deleted three times today. I think this should be salted, also.  STORMTRACKER   94  Go Irish! 20:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Oops, saw the log wrong.  STORMTRACKER   94  Go Irish! 20:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Shortening Shuttle
This article already mentions this product, and I understand your aversion to my posting of the website link, and can accept that, but what about the paragraph describing the product? you can email me @ jeremiah.t.hawley@gmail.com  Thank you for your time, Jeremiah  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.203.78.243 (talk) 20:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the request for speedy deletion of the Alph article
After our first conversation on the Talk:Transhumanism and whenever our last conservastion occurs, it seems that User:Lemmey is on a campaign to severly edit or speedily delete many articles I have created and pictures I have uploaded over the years or any article I have recently edited (the Alph article being the most recent example). Although I know I don't own anything and I concede that that some of these articles and pictures deserved to be improved or deleted, I feel there is something un-Wikipedian in his behavior when it seems to be done out of malice rather than a duty to improve Wikipedia. Is there anything that can done about this? --Loremaster (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

random Huggle question
Umm, you keep deleting pages right after I click to tag them for speedy. So Huggle leaves meaningless notices on people's talk pages. Any ideas? J.d ela noy gabs adds 21:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. BTW, I liked your /list_of_things_that_will_get_speedily_deleted subpage. J.d ela noy gabs adds  21:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your quick action against user IAMAERGG and his vandalism of my talk page. --Deadly&forall;ssassin 08:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Horror Metal
Hi. Thanks for looking into that. I think your idea is very good. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 08:56, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
I finally figured out how to work the barnstars here. Here goes:

Craigslist ad controversy
I had provided a large amount of sources for the Craigslist ad controversy article at Articles for deletion/Craigslist ad controversy.--Sinister beard man (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Niagara Falls (band)
Just wondering if you can shed a little light on your deletion of Niagara Falls (band). What additional info do you need?Thefatamorgana (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Rolling Back To An Older Version
An entry that had been up for some time (Keys to the vatican) which I modified two nights night has been deleted. Would it be possible to roll it back to an older, acceptable version of the entry? 71.194.93.166 (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for your help with the Abu Nacheem redirect.--Shirt58 (talk) 13:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

RadioZDead
Why was the RadioZDead entry deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.184.116.169 (talk) 13:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

My Talk Page
Not sure why is so eager to vandalize my userpage, but Thanks for helping to revert their shenanigans. It's appreciated. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Robert F. Kennedy assassination
Many thanks for sorting out the complex web of vandalism that took place on this article. Such a contentious topic that it's nice to know people are watching out for it! Fritzpoll (talk) 18:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Sclytheiem bostarosa
Hi Nawlin, I came across the above article being developed as a new page. A quick google search threw up no results. As the author also created an attack page which was based on a genus page, I wanted to ask you to take a look. I want to AGF so don't want to delete tag without cause. Could you take a look? --<b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:#FF8C00;">Deadly&forall;ssassin</b> 19:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually don't worry - the latest edits clearly show it to be a hoax. :D --<b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:#FF8C00;">Deadly&forall;ssassin</b> 19:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

speedy
I know you're an experienced admin--about the same length of time as for me-- but I do not think "original essay" a reason for speedy? Since the article will probably get a good deal of attention do to the educational project, I think it matters to do things correctly, which in this case would be to undelete it and nominate it for prod. It is indeed an inappropriate Wikipedia article, and I don't think too much of it as an academic paper either--superficial analysis. DGG (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * oops--this is about The Effects of Rising Gas Prices . DGG (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Erm... no?
My contribution was genuine, actually. Don't be ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loggypopschitte (talk • contribs) 22:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Jumping the gun!
I would like to know why my page was deleted so quickly with out the means to provide a full page of supporting information. I had barely began and it was immediately intepreted as adverstising. If this is the case there are many pages of information I would consider "blatent advertising" on wikipedia. I am only figuring out how this system works. - HomesZ

RomexSoft
I would like to ask you to review the delition of the article, since all the required changes have been conducted. You may review them on my page User: Fuegoasul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuegoazul (talk • contribs) 12:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

RomexSoft
Then could you possibly explain (for I'm affraid I must have misunderstood the information about notability), what exactly makes the page notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuegoazul (talk • contribs) 13:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

RomexSoft
I would like to appologize for taking so much of your time, but there is one more question about notability which I would like to ask you. Does the fact that RomexSoft company is the Adobe solution partner(this can always be checked on the Adobe site which was included into sources of the deleted article) prove the notability? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuegoazul (talk • contribs) 13:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate your answers. The reliable sources will be found. Afterwards I would like to submit the article for revision. Thank you very much. Fuegoazul (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Webkinz Recipes
Why on earth did you delete this page so quickly, I tested it came back immediately to the page and you had deleted it - I still had content to add. --Scaifea (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

T.P. Callaghan
The author finally crossed paths with an admin who was willing to decline the speedy the fifth time around, so I've taken it to AfD. Fire away. -- Finngall <font color="#D4A017">talk  16:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

The BT man
So my contribution entitled The BT man was deleted because it did not indicate why it was notable.

However, wiki guidelines state: "If it is likely that independent sources could be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate unless active effort has been made to find these sources. For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort."

From what I can see the article was deleted by someone who doesnt live in the UK, doesnt understand the significance of the phrase The BT man and who doesnt understand that an individual calling his business The BT man and travelling round in a Robin Hood-esque type manner saving BT customers huge sums of money, and generally telling customers the things that BT dont want them to know, is a notable subject and should NOT have been deleted.

I am going to register a formal complain with wiki about the speed and lack of discernable action. Glowplug2 (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Unable to log in due to wikipedia technical fault
Do you know what is going on? I was logged in but then got logged out due to a technical problem. Do you have any idea how to get me to log in? 78.145.104.107 (talk) 17:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Brian Sherwin
Hi. Can you give me more feedback about this bio? My plan is to contribute bios for other art bloggers/writers of note like Edward Winkleman and Tyler Greene once I finish with the Sherwin bio. I would also like to do some articles on the art fairs like Scope if they are not on here already. Also, it appears that the interviews conducted by Mr. Sherwin that I added as external links have vanished. For example, I added a link to the interview Mr. Sherwin had with James Rosenquist on the James Rosenquist article in the external links section and it vanished shortly after my first attempt at creating a bio for Mr. Sherwin. I noticed there are other interviews with Mr. Rosenquist listed in the external list so I'm confused as to why the Myartspace interview link was removed. I'm new. I don't really understand. I really want to contribute art related material on wikipedia but at this rate it seems pointless. (Roodhouse1 (talk) 18:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC))

Manon Dave
Hi, NawlinWiki! I noticed you recently declined an article that I nominated for speedy deletion. I was just curious if you were able to find any coverage of the subject? I was unable to find any corroborating evidence that he had done any of the things he said he had done outside of his own MySpace page. Would it have been more appropriate to tag it as a hoax? Please let me know- I just came back from a lengthy Wikibreak and might be a little rusty. Thanks! --Kuzaar-T-C- 19:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing that so quickly! :) --Kuzaar-T-C- 19:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for reverting the edit on my talk page, if their is anything I could help you with just contact! Best regards -- 'Kanonkas' : <font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;"> Take Contact 19:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Ryder Scott
You speedily deleted my article on Ryder Scott. I believe the company is notable, as it is a prime example (as the biggest company in the field) of a little known but in some ways quite important oil industry niche - that of reservoir evaluation and analysis by third parties for external confirmation. While you may not have deemed that noteworthy from the stub, I was under the impression that before an article is deleted I'm supposed to get a fleeting chance at defending it (and perhaps throw in some kind of vote) before everything I wrote is removed. TastyCakes (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Fine. I would rather not have had to retype everything I put in though. TastyCakes (talk) 20:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Page is remade. Please let me know if I still haven't convinced you of it's notableness.. TastyCakes (talk) 20:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Well Ryder Scott is mentioned quite a lot on the internet (google search "Ryder Scott + oil") for example, , , but it is largely in reference to the reserve estimates they make. The company itself is not very often discussed, just like you wouldn't find many websites talking about statscan but you will find lots of websites talking about the reports they put out. TastyCakes (talk) 21:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Torturing Nurse page, deleted as I typed
Wow, I barely had time to finish the first paragraph of a Torturing Nurse page before it was speedily deleted! If you know noise music, you know Torturing Nurse, please give people a chance to finish! That was unbelievable!

WikiStuffs (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Any chance of a discussion regarding this?

WikiStuffs (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of redirects with history created right after undiscussed controversial moves
Sorry, but from this message it seems to me that you misunderstood the problem. This redirect is an indirect consequence of a page move made without discussion despite its being obviously controversial. After the page move, the artificial history of the page was created to make a move back cumbersome. This method of forcing one's view is known for a while as AndriyK's trick, by the name of inventor, and there is a special arbcom remedy just for the moves of this kind. The move needs to be undone through a deletion of history and moving the article back. Than the incoming links would be fix automatically. Regards, --Irpen 03:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Jason Wood
What's going on? 12:00, May 8, 2008 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) deleted "Jason Wood (politican)" ‎ (R3: Recent redirect from implausible typo, link or misnomer) - Jason Wood, Australian federal election, 2007/Post-election pendulum, and others now have him missing. Where is the page? Timeshift (talk) 09:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Epicurean
NawlinWiki, I haven't made a new page on Wikipedia in a year or so. I have re-made the Epicurean (band) page and I hope it is satisfactory now. I do not have much information on this band, but that is why I came to Wikipedia last night - to learn about the band. Then I found out there was no page, so I decided I had to make one and hope that other editors might have information about the band. Hopefully we will not have a speedy deletion this time. (The deletion was very speedy, I made the page before I went to bed and it was gone before I got up - I had no chance to modify the page per instructions on my talk page.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrendo (talk • contribs) 12:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Ryan Carrassi
Concerning this writer, you deleted his imdb bio because: "(IMDB is not a reliable source, and the IMDB article says he worked on a TV series 6 years before he was born). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)". The tv series is a soap opera STILL broadcast on NBC[]. So, he join the staff in 2001. There is no reason in order to delete or consider NOT A RELIABE SOURCE the IMDB database.Thanks--Alexfilippi (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

My block of 70.234.179.107
You gave this user a final warning at their talk page for their vandalism to Talk:Slut. However, that was the same edit I decided to block them for, plus their previous edits (all were vandalism). I'd like your opinion: good block or bad block? Acalamari 20:43, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay then. Thank you for your input. Acalamari 20:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Bonus Awards
i just made a new page and you deleted the page before i can get back to it and improve the pages info...

Itsmacko (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion_review/Log/2008_April_26
This could really use a closing. Would you mind looking at it? Thanks. --UsaSatsui (talk) 22:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Dock Jumping
Have you never seen dogs Dock Jumping? I thought you reason for deletion of Dock jumping was not in the best interest of the sport. Because that's what it is a dog sport just like Flyball,Agility and more. The article was not about one organization as in my list of links. It has been around since 2001, as seen on ESPN Great Outdoor Games, Purina's Incrediable Dog Challenge and many club events. With many thousands of dogs and handlers worldwide participating at various venues. As I am not the best writer, I want to submit Dock Jumping so that others may add to it. Gd8man (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Gd8man (talk) 23:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC) —

OK if blanket deletions are the norm at least respond as I have lined up a couple of good writers to add to "Dock Jumping" Gd8man (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2008

You will get slamed    as I posted in several forums come on at least let it get started....... Gd8man (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Find reliable independent sources, and we'll "let it get started." Simple as that

That is the problem,,,,,I have listed reliable independent sources.....I guess you are to busy to check my resourses

But I am sure we can work something out. Thanks..Gd8man (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Check out the United Kennel Club's sit at this URL. Dock jumping is a sport recognized by the UKC

http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/WebPages/Home —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.209.198 (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Gd8man (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Close discussion?
Hi Nawlin - can you close this discussion, I'm not sure why it's still open but the consesus is pretty clear. Articles for deletion/DMurawski. Also, I don't know if you get involved in SSP cases, but if you do, could you have a look at this one? Suspected sock puppets/Dmurawski --<b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:#FF8C00;">Deadly&forall;ssassin</b> 23:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Your help please...
The record shows you deleted Mishal Al Madany. It says it was deleted because it pointed at a non-existent page. Could you please tell me the name of the article it pointed at? Geo Swan (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * At the risk of seeming anal would you check to see if the original version pointed at Musa Abed Al Wahab? I clicked on the history sometime before it was deleted.  It showed I created the redirection.  It showed someone redirected it, then tagged it for speedy deletion.  I would like to see if that tagger engaged in an act of vandalism.


 * Thanks!  Geo Swan (talk) 18:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 17:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Archive
Hello there, I was`trying to archive my talk page(for the first time) when it seemed to have been deleted by yourself. I may have been doing it wrong, if so I would appreciate it if you could tell me what. --Jack forbes (talk) 00:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Jack forbes (talk) 00:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

The COOKIE MONSTER ate the cow
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Fattyjwoods Push my button has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hi, just to make sure you’re not too hungry, I gave you a cookie! I would’ve given you milk – but the cow just died and I tried to milk the bull but it kicked me in the face. *sob*. Anyway, enjoy the cookie!! Fattyjwoods Push my button 05:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Sigma Technology deleted
Hello Nawlin, could you possibly explain why my page on Sigma Technology was speedily deleted? I've posted 'underconstruction template as it was in Rules, and i suggest the page would be 'wikipedian' enough. For example this page does exist: Relic Entertainment, what's wrong with my page? I belive Sigma is a notable company in the area of multiobjective optimization, and I can provide scientific approch for this article. I assure you that people interested in optimization algorhytms and related topics will be glad to visit this page and share some expierence in this area. All links will be given. Hope you answer soon... --User:Xevilgeniusx 15:41( time Moscow), 11 May 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 11:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Yes, so i just need to fill it, please don't remove it again, i'll finish in a few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xevilgeniusx (talk • contribs) 11:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments, can I try to remake the page after hangon template being placed? I suppose the best explanation will be the article by itself with all possible citations. Xevilgeniusx (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Crazy Diamond deletion
Could you please explain me, why you just deleted my article on the Pink Floyd tribute band Crazy Diamond (while i was still writing)? They had thousands of concert viewers so far, and present a well known show (often mentioned in press). Thank you for explanation. --Blue.dev (talk) 13:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Michael Scott ODonnell
Hi, I feel that "article: Michael Scott ODonnell" was improperly deleated. Since Anna Louise Jackson is a business reporter for Medill Reports, and it is an independant news paper, and she found this artist's work relevant for the article she was writing on the current economic times on her own reserch. The song that is relivant is Recession Depressin Blues I belive that it makes the musican somewhat notable. especially given this economic state we are in today. Thank youMso music (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleting Article TravelNetCon
Hello the explanation is not realy significant,

there was page before with all info etc.. and it was deleted without communication

I sugest that you remove FON articel too. it contains only advertizing !! and noone cares. Nice work!

Delleting rules.

Kurtik (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Special Delivery article
Couldn't think of what to write, do have some memories about what has air there. Want to try it again.

--mich (talk) 20:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

trixolan
Though I certainly understand why you'd think the article was a hoax, sadly, Trixolan is indeed another chapter in the history of quack medicine. I've fixed the article up a bit to make it more closely conform to reality, and added a reference. It still needs improvement, and one might object to inclusion on the grounds of notability, but I think it's probably better to have an article than not. - Nunh-huh 04:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion
Add this info to this users page for identification of a Grawp account. here is the proof.

And another user here with the proof here

And another user here with the proof here Thanks <font color="darkblue" face="Tahoma">Roadrunnerz45  (talk 2 me) 13:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kenneth Gordon Neufeld
An article that you have been involved in editing, Kenneth Gordon Neufeld, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Kenneth Gordon Neufeld. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Why have you reverted my question
Why have you reverted my question? Mr Beans Backside (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware contributing to the encyclopedia was a requirement for asking questions on the Reference Desk. However, my question was malformed - I wrote Easter is today! (I'm getting tired) so I take your point. Perhaps that question needs refining further before I ask it again. Mr Beans Backside (talk) 20:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Why are you reverting more of my questions? What is you reason for removing them? Mr Beans Backside (talk) 20:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * And my response is the same: I wasn't aware contributing to the encyclopedia was a requirement for asking questions on the Reference Desk. I am going to restore all those questions except the first one you reverted, as I agree with that once. Mr Beans Backside (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I will not restore them under threat of being banned. I do however object to your ham handed handling of this situation. Mr Beans Backside (talk) 20:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, thanks for fixing my mistake on Domino theory. I clicked revert just a moment too late and reverted a reversion, bringing the vandalism back onto the page. I was about to undo my edit, when I saw you had already fixed it. So, thanks again. Useight (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Creation of cosmos
Hi NawlinWiki. I just placed a PROD template on this article, and then discovered that you'd deleted it less than ten minutes later. Aren't PRODs supposed to remain in place for five days? If you were in fact deleting it under the speedy criteria, your deletion summary did not give that impression. Olaf Davis | Talk 12:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I've replied to your reply on my talkpage. Olaf Davis | Talk 12:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nawlin, deleting it with the explanation "Category g11 states: "Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." I'm interpreting the "entity" here as Christianity. If you disagree with that interpretation, that's your prerogative. " is a very wrong use of Speedy. A naive article giving the biblical view of evolution is not even remotely g11.   DGG (talk) 19:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * resolved and thanks, as per my talk page. DGG (talk) 23:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Page move protections
I noticed you protected and  against page moves. I'm just curious about these protections. Has there been some sort of problem with someone moving city and state articles against consensus? Or is this a preemptive strike against vandalism (e.g. someone moving Minneapolis to HAGGER???)

I'm mainly just curious, so I'm not arguing about it. I doubt that someone is really trying to move Minneapolis (like to the east side of the Mississippi River, for instance). --Elkman (Elkspeak) 17:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. I'm also curious about this; I noticed that you have move-protected Anguilla. I'm mainly curious because I've always viewed protection as a reactive tool, rather than a proactive one, and this protection seems proactive. Is this something that's commonly done on articles nowadays? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Anne Blair Brown Page Removal
I was in the process of creating the page on the artist Anne Blair Brown, when I received notice that it was deleted because it didn't have enough content to support her significance. Can you please un-delete the page, so I can add more content. Anne is a very well respected, professional artists, who is considered one of the top Plein-air painters in the Southeast. Her work is sold in many galleries and has been shown in exhibits in many cities.

I'm new to the original article creation process and hadn't checked back in a week. I missed the window of warning to add more info before it was removed.

Let me know how I need to proceed.

Thanks! Katrocity (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for move protecting important articles
Thanks for move protecting these articles, there is really no reason that these should be moved without consensus. Just leaving this note to say that this is a good move and a step in the right direction. Hobartimus (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks for taking on the task. I assume you've also move-protected all of the pages moved in the recent Grawp wave? I myself create-protected all the deleted titles he moved those pages to. Acalamari 20:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Protected notices: Uzbekistan, Tajikistan
You have placed two "protected" notices on Uzbekistan (May 13, 20:35) and Tajikistan (May 13, 20:14). I am a new editor and I am trying to learn. Please tell me if these "protected" notices were prompted by something that I had done improperly while editing Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, and if there is anything that I should now do in response to your notices? I look forward to hearing from you soon. --Zlerman (talk) 03:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Rajiv ganatra
You just speedy deleted this page as a G7. I think that this is not in fact the case - it was nominated incorrectly four minutes after its creation by an inexperienced editor; the original author has done nothing except to create the article. It may, of course, be speediable as non-notable! --<b style="color:red;">Anthony.bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk" 18:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do not apologise. It was only that I was just explaining to the nominating editor when my evidence vanished!!! --<b style="color:red;">Anthony.bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk" 18:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

rapid deletions
can be a pain when teaching a class on how to edit wikipedia. I'll delete the stuff, but we need something to work with!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bubba12345 (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I only just got started on creating the Twhirl page. Indeed I just put out a call for volunteers in a place where people who can help me build a decent page hang out. I think I can justify why the subject matter is noteworthy enough. Care to give the page another chance? Cheers, Martin Packer (talk) 19:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal
See User talk:216.56.60.3. This account has been vandalizing The Pirates of Penzance today. It appears that he/she has been warned more than 4 times.... -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal
User: 170.158.88.114 has vandalised article "Hi". Can you give him/her a warning? Thx. Mooncrest (talk) 23:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Led Bib
--ProperFraction (talk) 04:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

PRowl Public Relations
Why did you delete this page? I wasn't finished editing it, and had more information to add. Is there anyway you can recover the text so I can edit it please?

AfD nomination of Bigger Than Cheeses
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bigger Than Cheeses, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Bigger Than Cheeses. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stationary (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You
Works now ;p.  ·Add§hore·  <sup style="color:blue;">T alk /<sub style="color:blue;">C ont

DVD.CO.UK
Company is bigger than others listed as online retailers so why did you delete it?(talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC) So how do I go about editing the article once it has been deleted to put external links in? Here are some examples [] [] [] Also do a search for the site on google you will see it appears top with full listings? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vodkaandice (talk • contribs) 21:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The (HTCIA) high tech crime investigation association is a professional non-profit organization for individuals in the field of digital & computer forensics on both the law enforcement and corporate side. Its membership includes investigators, prosecutors and security professionals of all kinds. As an organization they offer training in the methods, processes, and techniques relating to investigations and security in advanced technologies. They are also an opportunity for computer investigators to network with each other and people in industry so that they can get to know one another. They offer regular events and conferences in which people present and discus new developments in the field of computer forensics and computer security and offer training in forensic tools and methods.

Deletion of HTCIA stub
The htcia's notability is that it is one of the most well known associations for computer forensics and computer law enforcement in the US. The reason i put it in a stub is in the hopes that others, perhaps those in HTCIA might be able to provide more information as to it beginnings, workings, events, and such to help provide context and further prove notability. it was my impression that stubs were the perfect vehicle for adding a little bit of information in the hopes of gaining more. also the HTCIA is as notable with in certain circles as some of the other stubs in the law enforcement stubs category. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rooktoc3 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Scientology
Hi NawlinWiki my sentence on violence in scientology was true. Just look at the article. My sentence was not personal belifs it is the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyhmrp (talk • contribs) 01:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Yep. Properly speaking, I didn't blank the page; something went awry with the undo function. But what's really important is that you fixed something that needed to be fixed. Thanks much. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 03:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Just making sure
You are not completely asleep in Crotia, etc. Wake up. Read history. Holon67 (talk) 03:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

New Orleans, city of justice
LOL! Give it up! Figures you would come down on the BPP, eh? Holon67 (talk) 03:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Reginald Earl Clinton.
You should salt it. J.d ela noy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 18:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * D'oh!

And J.delanoy has a swing and a miss for his third attempt to be an admin when he is not one.
 * Nuts, I struck out... J.d ela noy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  18:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Firelord1116 has many meatpuppets!
Forget him, I nearly died laughing. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 19:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the help! The discussion I was talking about is here, just so you know.--<font style="background:orange;">Crzycheetah 20:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean "not enough context to identify the subject"? The page had her name and the date her body was found. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prost 8 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Do you have to be so rude? You said nothing about content you said there wasn't enough context to identify her. I challenge you to Google her name and see if she can't be found with that information. And why did you not even ask me before deleting it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prost 8 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Did you Google her name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prost 8 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

But did you actually bother to Google it? I'd be interested to see what the first result you get is. It would probably be faster than trying to get it deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prost 8 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

TheDUBClan
We are writing about the history of this clan, the only way to remember this is to write it down. DUB-iLLy (talk) 21:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Diane Chenery Wickens
If you had had your way it would have been deleted. You said because the subject couldn't be identified, but taking 5 seconds to search google and you now think that is worthy of an article. Why didn't you do that in the first place? No sooner had I created the first draft of the article, you deleted it. Don't you see what you have done wrong? Why are you blaming me for not creating the perfect article? I am the one who has created a new article, you have only tried to get it deleted.

By the way, how was I supposed to know that I had to add a source and the information about the awards before I first saved a draft, to prevent you rushing in and deleting it, without bothering to check whether you could identify the subject from the information provided?

Here, I'll even give you the Google link, so you can see what a search would have given you: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Diane+Chenery-Wickens&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

How do I contact NAWLINWIKI?Captainmiamimike (talk) 22:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting the vandal on my talk page. <font color="4169E1">Schfifty Three  22:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Amendment of Holland
I found this in the history of the Holland page:

03:46, 14 May 2008 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) m (Protected Holland: no reason to move this page w/o discussion [move=sysop]) (undo)

There are serious issues with the "Holland" page, as described there. Are you against the proposed amendments to this page? There is a discussion going on, but you haven't made a comment on the discussion page. I don't know what you mean by "protect", but the amendments I'm proposing will be made with the consensus of the regular users who visit and comment there regularly. The idea is not to "move the page", but to turn it into a "redirect" page. People typing in Holland should go directly to the "Holland (disambiguation)" page. Given the intense confusion about the meaning of Holland (and the vandalism directed against this page) it's important that users wishing to learn more about "Holland" be directed to the appropriate spot.

Schildewaert (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
For the vandal block on 170.211.92.253. I get so tired of these nitwits, it's good to see one get locked out. Trekphiler (talk) 09:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Brownsea Island Scout camp
I don't mind this being protected, but what prompted this? — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 21:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Protections
Hiya, what the heck's going on with all these protections? DWaterson (talk) 21:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah right, I hadn't realised there was an ongoing vandalism issue. Obviously, as quite a few of those articles hadn't had _any_ edits for weeks, it seemed a bit odd! DWaterson (talk) 21:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Move protection
I noticed that you have move protected several articles which are on my watchlist as I participated in getting them to FA eg Bath, Somerset, Chew Stoke, Chew Valley and Chew Valley Lake. I don't have a problem with this as I have no desire to move them - I just wondered if anything had triggered this action or whether it had been discussed anywhere?&mdash; Rod talk 21:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Everglades National Park
Pardon me for the temporary and mini-freakout, but what the hell just happened? Did someone try to move this article? Is it being threatened or discussed somewhere? Please let me know. --Moni3 (talk) 22:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Move protections
Hey there. I saw you were doing batch move protections. I don't mind the FAs being move-protected, just please don't batch move-protect other categories of articles without discussion and / or a really good reason. There's a related thread on AN currently regarding this issue (the "Grawp" headline). My views are expanded a bit there. Essentially, it will very likely only disruptive legitimate contributors with little to no effect on Grawp. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I also noticed and was a bit curious as to why it was happening. Didn't disagree with the move protections that came up on my watchlist but didn't think anyone was trying to move them either.  Regards--Matilda talk 00:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Aha - I understand but worthwhile perhaps putting a prominent note at the top of this page for those of us (and there seems a few) who are bemused or curious :-) --Matilda talk 00:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not bemused or curious. Just want it to stop, for the most part. : - ) It's entirely ineffective and harmful to the wiki spirit. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks a wrong practice to me. I saw the protection on Peterborough, but for example why should there be protection on South Side (Chicago), which could equally be at South Side, Chicago or South Side of Chicago or something similar?  If non-admins are by policy usually allowed to move pages, then there needs to be a good reason for protection in each case.--Rumping (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You won't stop Grawp like this, but it's clear that some pages shouldn't be moved, at least without discussion. Page moves are exceptional if you compare with usual edits, I don't see how it could be harmful to the Wiki spirit. Otherwise, let's lift the move protection of, say, United States. Is it worth the risk ? I don't think so, it's like our high visibility templates, they are locked. We have, and likewise, it's easy to ask an admin to move a page. Really, articles like World, or Europe, have no reason to be moved unilaterally. <font color="#000080">Cena <font color="#1560bd">rium <font color="#000090"> (talk) 00:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for protecting Shahbag. It's a wonder to find how even low-interest articles can fall victim to vandalism. :( Aditya (talk • contribs) 02:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Lucysbar/Lucy's Retired Surfers Bar
Sorry for the template... :) Kelly  hi! 15:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually I ran across it by accident while cleaning up duplicate images using this tool - one of the images on the page was duplicated by another image. Kelly  hi! 18:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Advantage Real Estate Professionals
I'd like you to take a look at this. I found it while patrolling AfD. It's been deleted twice now, once by you. Suggest salting too. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 20:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Zachary Levenson
Can you give a reason for reverting my speedy delete of Zachary Levenson? Should I have done an WP:AFD? -- Alan Liefting ( talk ) - 21:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Protection
I do not understand your most recent edits of Prairie Avenue and South Side (Chicago). What kind of protection did you enable or disable?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
I respect what you admins do for the project. But admit it, sometimes you just want to tell people what you think, don't you? I did just that. And it felt good. Really good! Take care! BartoFinley (talk) 00:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Removed prod from Josh Azzarella‎
I have removed the prod tag from Josh Azzarella‎, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! --  At am a chat 21:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Removed prod from Legacy of Johns Hopkins, it is up for AfD instead
I have removed the prod tag from Legacy of Johns Hopkins, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. I have nominated the article for deletion instead; the debate may be found at Articles for deletion/Legacy of Johns Hopkins, which overrides the need for a prod tag. I have explained my reasons for doing this in my nomination. Thanks! --  At am a chat 21:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks
I know I was being a silly vandal, but I wanted to thank you for at least being civil in your revision to the article ~ much unlike the message I received from ——Ryan | t • c 21:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC). Thanks for being civil!

City status in the United Kingdom protection
I don't understand why this page has been protected. Please clarify.GSTQ (talk) 01:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

User talk:PAiigE likes sexy with steffii
Looks like our deletes overlapped. I've left a welcome just in case this is a going to be a good editor. -- Rodhull andemu  13:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Isnt this a user name vio?
I came across User:PAiigE likes sexy with steffii and was going to post it for user name vio, but I saw that you have already engaged the user before and have now welcomed him. Isnt it a user name vio? Just asking for my own clarif. Not questioning judgement. :)Prashanthns (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Removed prod from Chelsea Provost, bringing to AfD instead
I have removed the prod tag from Chelsea Provost, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. I have nominated the article for deletion instead; the debate may be found at Articles for deletion/Chelsea Provost, which overrides the need for a prod tag. I have explained my reasons for doing this in my nomination. Thanks! --  At am a chat 19:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Please restore this speedy deletion
15:42, 25 October 2007 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) deleted "Haven (American band)" ‎ (a7 nonnotable band content was: 'Haven was a Christian progressive Metal band from southern New Jersery that was active in the mid-late 1980's and early 1990's.==Discography...' (and the only contributor was '[[Special:Contributions/Edjbruner|Edjbru)

I'm not sure why you felt this entry was a candidate for speedy deletion. I looked over your 'List of things that will get speedily deleted' and still cannot find a good reason. Perhaps you think the author is referring to some garage band? A wiki reference to this band had been created in the 'List of Artists' section on the wiki page for R.E.X. Records, a record company,  prior to the deletion of these comments. That wiki reference to Haven was created by someone other than the author of this deleted text, so it is fair to assume these comments were not entered as a joke. Haven was in fact a signed band that existed as described. Please restore this deleted page or at least provide a better explanation why it was deleted. Thanks.Optimistic42 (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Jayron23
What is going on with this block? Why? Thanks. Edison (talk) 16:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * On seeing the block I thought it was of the similarly named admin. I must be lysdexic. Edison (talk)
 * Yeah... It happens. Have a nice day Esidon... --Jayron32. talk . contribs  16:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

ericmcglashing
You have deleted my page several times in the last day. Vigilant Office. I had tried following your guidelines as stated by adding relevant material. I have followed the others larger corporations templates but still you continue to delete my page. How is it that large corporations such as oracle can have a page on wiki but a smaller less know one can not. Seems a little fishy to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericmcglashing (talk • contribs) 16:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Nipplemop
Robin Jepson is my best friend. How dare you suggest I would make an attack on him! How very dare you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipplemop (talk • contribs) 11:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Yap Chen Sing
Hi. I've speedied this in the past, but this version is better. Unsure about notability and also unsure about RS. I think there's now enough in there for a speedy to be inappropriate. Not sure if it should go to AfD. What do you think? --Dweller (talk) 14:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Useful to confer on these things. Sometimes I feel like I'm itching to delete something because I've already deleted it and it's hard to remain impartial, so I usually look for another online admin. Cheers. --Dweller (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

SpanishDict
Changes have been made. Please check again.

Thank you
For the block on Coltonsmellsfunny. I get so tired of vandals... 1 Q, tho: is there a way to read the deleted content? I'm looking at the Craiglist above & wondered what the fuss was. Trekphiler (talk) 15:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No, thanks, just idle curiosity. Trekphiler (talk) 16:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Kaizen Records
Hi you deleted the page I was working on regarding the kaizen record shop. I don't see it was any less worthy of a page on wiki than others such as Chemical Records ??? Please get back to me as I would like it restored if possible, or at least an explanation to what I'd need to do to keep it there. Thanks Jezstar999 (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

-

--- i feel abused!?

Ah found how to operate this talk page thing. Ah I see above someone else objecting to this administrators work Please master eraser please say why you blackballed I then sent I to Coventry (English colloquialism for not talking to you). I have emailed you and you appear to be running away. At first you said the tone wasn’t correct so I modified the language - humbly adding words like "some believe" and then you insult I. You then want citation - I say which parts and you don’t reply. You have made several other contradictions of wiki, your self and your own work Please reply. I can always post my emails to you up here if it helps show a fuller picture. I dare not touch another page lest I am ostracised further and banished from YOUR wiki world. Please make sense when you answer 88.107.59.19 (talk) 18:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC) oops forgot brackets let i try again(88.107.59.19 (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC))

this bracket thing isnt working i sure i missing some technical thing - never mind i sure admin knows where i live (english expression for a threat - i.e. we know where you live)

i'll try again (88.107.59.19 (talk) 18:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC))

ah think this should work - i figured i was log lapsed time out time by followin' the talk page to find anon (abbreviation for anonymous)

here we go then try again (22catch (talk) 18:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC))should have worked did it? ps the smiley lost his eyes i notice above - that’s gotta smart - or are their eyes closed wide shut - like admin possibly? .-) [this is a wink. nod is as good as a wink to a blind bat ?{monty python}]

---

Bucknell Pong Deletion
I am wondering why you deleted my article on Bucknell Pong.

Bucknell Pong is mentioned as one of the major forms of Pong in the Dartmouth Pong article. It does not fall under the deletion criteria as I read them. Anyway, I would appreciate it if you could explain to me how to ensure that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria so it won't be deleted again.LedRush (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * If you believe it is just a variant of Beer Pong, why does Dartmouth Pong get its own variation (which is quite different than the Bucknell version which is accepted as one of the major forms)? Also, I suspect you didn't research this completely and perhaps didn't even read the article...you've made Bucknell Pong redirect to the Beirut page (throwing pong (invented at Bucknell, BTW)) and not "Beer Pong (with paddles)" article!


 * I hope you can take three actions: (1) correct the redirect; (2) provide me with the "code" of my article so I can take my old article and fold it into the "Beer Pong (with paddles)" one (which I won't do until #3); (3) engage me in discussion as to whether this subject belongs on Wikipedia.LedRush (talk) 20:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking actions 1 and 2. I have moved my complaints to the Bucknell Pong page so it won't crowd our talk sections.  I hope on that page you can explain to me why Dartmouth Pong is treated differently than the Bucknell version, and address my other points.  Thanks in advance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LedRush (talk • contribs) 20:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The Dartmouth Pong article does not have citations which claim it is a different game than other forms of Beer Pong (paddles). Quite the opposite, most indicate that there are several variations of the game at Dartmouth.  They don't refer to a single type of "Dartmouth Pong".


 * Several facts are undisputed. Dartmouth made a bunch of pong games with paddles.  There are a couple subsections of that game: a lob version and a fast verstion.  The lob version is the version primarily at Dartmouth while the Fast version is the version played primarily at Bucknell.  This is even uncontradicted in the Beer Pong (paddles) article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_pong_%28paddles%29


 * http://by134w.bay134.mail.live.com/mail/mail.aspx?wa=wsignin1.0&n=1701293834 (shows pong played at Bucknell in 1970)


 * http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2004/11/19/opinion/11525.shtml (shows popular variants of Pong (not played elsewhere) in early 80's.


 * http://www.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?MemberId=4744930370 (Another mention of Bucknell in the formation of Pong....note the director of the movie went to Colgate and used the "fast" form of Pong in the movie (Colgate and Bucknell are close rivals).


 * However, all of this is playing into your hands. You first stated that Bucknell Pong doesn't deserve an article because it should be a subset.  However, I demonstrated that Dartmough Pong is worthy of its own even though it is just a variant of Pong with paddles.  Then you changed the goal posts and said it was because of a lack of citations.  The Beer Pong (paddles) articles doesn't have any citations, yet it is around.  Also, I was hoping that I could expand on the article as I had time to do better research, and that people could read the article and help.  Poor citations are not enough to speedy delete an article.


 * Please, allow the article to stand and develop. If it doesn't hold up to long-term scrutiny, then take it down.  However, your reasons for deleting it now don't seem persuasive seeing that:


 * 1. Dartmouth Pong is worthy enough as a subject to get its own article
 * 2. Insufficient citations aren't enough to speedy delete an article
 * 3. Adding Bucknell Pong to Beer Pong (paddles) will disrupt the original article and confuse visitorsLedRush (talk) 21:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for being so patient with my comments, and for responding so quickly. Also, I am sorry for misstating your action (I didn't really know there was a difference between a redirect and a deletion).

If I take your suggestion (and fold both Dartmouth Pong and Bucknell Pong into Beer Pong (paddles), don't you think the article will be unwieldly? I thought the structure upon which I was trying to build would be easiest and most logical.  People can go to the main article to learn the basics of Pong with Paddles and they are introduced to a couple of major forms of it.  If they want to learn the detailed rules of different forms, then they could go to the specific articles on those forms.

I swear I am not trying to be a ball-buster, I just strongly believe that the existing structure is superior. Additionally, I don't fully see why my content is ok as a part of an article but not as an entire article. Thanks for your continued patience.LedRush (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Are you done engaging me on this, or are you just off work? Also, did you read my post on the Bucknell Pong discussion page? LedRush (talk) 23:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Can I take your silence to mean that you've accepting my last arguments?LedRush (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Yap Chen Sing Deletion
Why did you delete the article "Dr, Yap Chen Sing" ? If you think the article should be deleted, why not you delete "Joanne Yeoh"? I demand explanation.

Chewphuiyee (talk) 03:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Ducksofmercy block appeal
Firstly, I am unsure as to where my appeal case went on the admin noticeboard. I see that you answered first, so was hoping that you could help me. Secondly, I am not a sockpuppet. Is it possible to view Checkuser tests for myself to ascertain how you came to this conclusion. Thankyou. 86.135.194.220 (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

---

Rough summary: - I note you say you are not prepared to discuss further - I wish to say and ask a few things - I would be pleased for a reply - But only if you wish to - No rush – think about it - reply if you wish - when you not in a hurry:

1: I did not pick bpd randomly as place to put that passage. Any one with an overview of what is going on [the debate in the mental health arena] will know why I chose bpd: i) It is, and has long been, the most controversial label [schizophrenia is catching up now though]:	ii) It is within established texts that bpd teaches us something about mental illness definitions and personality disorders: iii) It is paradoxical in that the more extreme the case the less visible it is – unique and curious and of great difficulty to explain within the field of psychiatry: iv) Other reasons too technical for me to bother you with:

2: Can you tell me how many people are going to be logging in to discuss on bpd page. I WILL POST THIS THERE THOUGH ASWELL AS ELSEWHERE I GUESS:

3: I feel inclined to expose the emails I sent you – compelled actually. Openness in a dispute that someone has become sulky in is important I feel - It helps heal ALL of tribe: I emailed you out of consideration – but I prefer no secrets!!!:

4: Can we put article in with references – it does imply it is or may be a minority view. If not can I put disclaimer for wiki of any mental illness caused by reading a narrow received opinion?:

5: We could put it at bottom of article – I could add more – but NOTE AT HEADER TO SEE BOTTOM OF ARTICLE FOR ROUNDED VIEW WOULD BE ESSENTIAL? I could put the passage in anti psychiatry (which I did not know existed) BUT WOULD INSIST ON A LINK FROM ALL PSYCHIATRIC LABELS we can manage: This paragraph or a link must come near top (I did not put it at very top – I put it where it would be seen and where the following text ran seamlessly onward from it) AND BE CLEAR – see next point:

6: Wiki is not considered a reliable source for the technical – [despite a recent brilliant piece on bbc radio 4 ‘thinking allowed’ where a member of public compared wiki with Britannica on a varied selection of topics of which they were well versed – conclusion “the cathedral is dead - long live anarchy” TO PARAPHASE] – despite this rousing recommendation your reputation falls foul in others’ eyes of what you similarly wield then at others you see as beneath you - it would appear – THUS THE MAJORITY OF READERS WILL NOT EVEN KNOW OF BALANCING VIEW – MANY WILL BE SUFFERERS I SUSPECT – THIS IS DANGEROUS FOR BPD SUFFERERS AND CARERS – AS A POSSIBLE FIRST PORT OF CALL:

7: I AGREE WITH ALL THAT YOU HAVE SAID (see below point 8) - EXCEPT THE INSULT THING - YOU DEFINITELY STARTED IT - I BELIVE HUMOUR IS THE (one of) BEST MEDICINE - ADMITTEDLY THERE ARE at least TWO SIDES TO THIS ARGUMENT AND JOKES CAN HIDE AWFUL ABUSIVE MEMES – I THINK YOU WILL FIND YOU ARE PROJECTING AT ME FROM YOUR HIPPOCAMPUS AND HYPOTHYLAMUS etc STUFF THAT YOU HAVE PATTERNED FROM STARING AT SO MUCH VANDALISM OVER THE COURSE OF YOUR TIRELESS WORK - NO DOUBT - HUMOUR ASKS US TO SEE THINGS DIFFERENTLY - AT BEST IN A VERY CONSTRUCTIVE WAY - IF WE ARE too aloof & ARROGANT TO LOOK IT, CAN FEEL LIKE AN INSULT or we miss the point:

8: I have been very patient with you. You have ended up playing the ‘card’ you should surely have played first (and I would have expected first) last: i.e. That the article should be placed elsewhere or is not a majority view and so deservers little billing:

Of course this would mean that years ago gay would be a vicious attack on people as an entry: That ‘blacks’ should be whipped into slavery would be standard unquestioned stance in your wiki:

So I hope you see that in some articles wiki should be ahead of the game for reasons of GOOD WILL TO ALL (WO)MEN and children etc. MORAL compass etc:

9: you do not mention that some administrators (I have found one straight away) may agree about progressively fostering genuine sub cultural anthropology etc (please don’t suggest I stick it in anthropology section) – it is probably, world wide across time, a majority view – can site examples if you wish and that wiki encourages opposing views for balance:

10: The issue of verifiability here is going to be important for the reasons of the ethics of the victor writes the rules. I cite modern historical study as moving toward accepting this paradox and trying to allow for it:

11: I have my own model of the universe as does everyone including you:

12: I note your use of the word OUR wiki in a sentence that excluded me:

13: I have not reviewed your biographies as yet but I URGE you to stop and thinkfeel - In this article, I want, (if you say I do sir), though I don’t feel I ask for it, an exception - Not for me as YOU INSULTINGLY put it more than once. But for the people the very entry is defining:

Who are you to dictate wiki policy in a conflict of rules and interest situation? Stop playing games and god? What is knowledge for? Let form follow function IN THIS ARTICLE?:

14: I would prefer to leave the body of the article untouched and add this paragraph (you exclude point blank with a litany of bias within wiki world of rules) to article but I could go and justifiably with citation spend (waste) hours hacking it to pieces if you prefer. The omissions and lack of emotional balance in society are everything in the bpd world my friend! All humans share the bpd traits - let not wiki - if only in this article! Think of bpd and other negative labels as actually people carrying the load under sensitivity that you don’t feel:

15: We have proved you don’t like labels. I rarely label a child or any for this reason. I say not you are an idiot. I say is that not an idiot thing to do or idea? QED. This entry MATTERS. If you don’t like it - why should a fascist’s entry not have proportionate balance in terms of effect - not your personal view of wiki hierarchy?:

16: Example: Should one place a ‘proven’ negative about someone everyone says is good ‘ GOD ’ like - at the very top of article - say a judge or the bloke the Catholics recently dug up and put in a glass box for all to (file/’phile’ past) bow to and made a saint – yet he seems to have been an abuser and had a personality disorder:

Similarly should a positive view of someone everybody wants to negatively label be put forward when individually they may have done only ‘ GOD’s ‘ work.

Tricky entries my friend - Need love? - Children are reading wiki as source - The study of the cult of psychiatry (psychology is clearer but needs to be seen in a wider context) has in my experience driven sensitive searching people over the edge as it is not an answer to the human condition as commonly thought and is presented but is a system of management or at least view which does not ‘add up’? All systems are imperfect so it is (can only be) perfect within its framework? THIS IS IMPORTANT:

17: For the record - Social anthropology devours psychiatry and psychology as foundations - I do not like or dislike them - I am impartial - BUT I AM partial to love - I am a shrink - A psychologist - Child psychologist - And more and less:

18: I give thanks: .-)

(22catch (talk) 02:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC))

Anne Blair Brown
Can you please review the revised article on artist Anne Blaire Brown that you moved to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Katrocity/Anne_Blair_Brown?

I have done more research and added significantly more information about her to the article. Please let me know if it is approved moving to the main content now.

Please also let me know how I can delete the original bio seen at the top of the page. I don't have an edit capability there and would like to remove it.

Thanks!

Katrocity

Bad Deletion
I created a page for an African-American author, Dazjae (Dazjae Zoem) who has written the first book on African American Faerie, and sited the reasons for notability. Please reverse this deletion. This page was deleted two times, for reasons that make no sense to me. Cultural offerings, especially when they have been largely excluded, are important and definitely notable. BalancedInformation


 * Please note that I explained the reason for the article's deletion on your talk page in response to your comments on the article's recreated talk page. ju66l3r (talk) 21:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

What? Oh, Thanks.
Thanks. I didn't know about the whole namespace thing. --Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Cinemaphobia
Sorry about recreating that article, I was marking it for deletion when you deleted it, and Twinkle decided to recreate it! Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Your advice
Into whether this page should be deleted here When PPG reverted it she left the page as it is. You can have a look at the logs here. Surely this should be deleted right, theres no typo in that :-) I appreciate your opinion, thanks. <font color="darkblue" face="Tahoma">Roadrunnerz45  (talk 2 me) 04:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * BTW thanks for cleaning up my mistake at Television in the United States almost immediately. I appreciate it very much and we all appreciate the great work you do here on wikipedia. You deserve it my fellow wikipedian. <font color="darkblue" face="Tahoma">Roadrunnerz45  (talk 2 me) 08:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

From Romanhom
Hi, you recently deleted the link to the page in our site describing (text and photos) Rome's Jewish quarter, the former "Ghetto". I did not publish this page with any commercial intention. Our site romanhomes.com is very popular with clients, and is quite able to stand on its own. I just included the link solely because as a scholar of Jewish matters and topics, I sincerely think that the page http://www.romanhomes.com/your_roman_vacation/quarters/jewish-quarter.htm is the best regarding both the description and photos of the Jewish quarter. It is also well balanced, and takes into account all historical aspects of Rome Jews, still controversial to this day. In essence, it is a cultural page, which viewers of Wikipedia would have benefitted from. The same goes for a link which I recently posted on Tivoli's Villa d'Este http://www.romanhomes.com/your_roman_vacation/quarters/tivoli-villa-deste.htm which is one of the best descriptions, and it has among the best photos of Tivoli. Uniquely, it also has the sound of the water of the fountains. In this page there is no reference whatsoever to properties or any other service: in fact we don't even have properties there. It is just that we, and in particular myself, love Rome and we love to publish feature articles on its infinite wonders and charms, on one hand with detailed descriptions and photos - better than those you can find everywhere - and on the other hand with a commentary which is in-depth and however different from the usual "jingles-mantras-bla-bla" you find around. Thanks anyway for your attention. Dr. Mauro Abate - Roman Homes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanhom (talk • contribs) 08:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

From 98.220.148.51
Sorry about the new article, I was tryting to make that a subpage of my userpage!98.220.148.51 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Alien Life Form
Hello. I see you deleted this at 16:27, 3 May 2007 with the explanation:‎ a1 empty content was: 'ALF is a short term that means Alien Life Form. Its a general term for all Alien Life Forms. Although aliens are not proven...' I'm not certain who created that article, but it should have been made a redirect to extraterrestrial life, where the lowercase Alien life form has been pointing to since 16:06, 6 March 2006 when User:Chino created it.  You can find this usage sourced to Angelo, Joseph A. "alien life-form (ALF)." Encyclopedia of Space Exploration. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2000. Science Online. Facts On File, Inc. As a result, I've recreated the article as a redirect. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 23:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Usury/Archilles last stand
As I'm heading rapidly towards 3rr, and his/her edits may well be made in good faith rather than NPOV nonsense could you take a look again at the reverts and the paragraph they keep wanting to add to Usury. I've tried to be reasonable (in as much as I can be *grin*) on their talk page; but it's all gotten rather heated and insulting. Another opinion would be appreciated. --Blowdart | talk 13:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete the pspsex.net entry. It has every right to exist if http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veoh and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouPorn and dozen other ones are on there. The sites are even on the same list in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_services and each one has a wiki. Whats your problem with pspsex.net?

RE: Copied from Alison's talk page
It means the account was created due to the Single Unified Login...basically if you have enabled SUL, you can register an account on one wiki and get an account created automatically if you visit any others.<i style="font-family:comic sans ms; color:purple;">¤~Persian Poet Gal</i> <sup style="color:purple;">(talk) 05:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Ladies Lookin HOT
Hi,

Could you re-delete that page; I was tagging it as you deleted and ended up creating a new page with just tags. --  Chzz  ►  22:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC) I appreciate your zealous administration of Wikipedia, but can you friggin WAIT 15 MINUTES before deleting a page I JUST STARTED for "no substantive comment?" It is a bit of a pain in the ass. Thank you. --Woland (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * VonWoland, please watch your language.
 * It's necessary to patrol new pages carefully; I'm sure you can understand that there are hundreds of junk pages created on wikipedia every day.
 * A lot of work goes into checking new pages, and the people doing so have to make decisions as to the worthiness of the article that they see at the time.
 * This is why it's recommended to develop an article in a sandbox area, so that when it's put into an article, it's already good enough to stand.
 * I hope you'll understand this, and I'm genuinely sorry that you seem angry.
 * If I can help in any way, please ask me on my own talk page.
 * Thanks,
 * --  Chzz  ►  08:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)