User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 27

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

-

User:Tile join
Do you think 79.76.248.79 is another sock of Tile join? ~ Troy (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Ajrocksalot inappropriately removed?
I apologize if you aren't the correct person to address this, if there's somewhere else I should be addressing this issue please let me know. As far as I can tell from this diff, the user was removed from the Administrator intervention against vandalism page inappropriately by the bot. Am I correct about this? I did not want to re-nominate the user in question incorrectly. Thanks in advance for your help. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 13:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Just to let you know
Your not supposed to substitute the Schoolblock :P Dont ask me why because its not my speciality, if it doesn't matter and you've been doing this ever since then i apologise for the inconvenience, i know your busy. Au revoir  Monster Under Your Bed  (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Algoryx Simulation Phun 2D Physics Sandbox et.al.
Howdy, I have added references on the Phun 2D Physics Sandbox page, that you marked for deletion. I would appreciate if you could review and respond. Best regards, Kenbon (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I understand and respect your point about verifiability, but it is not entirely easy to define 'what' needs to be verified in this case. There aren't really any claims made on the Phun page, more than that it exists (I'm mainly asking for my own education on this subject). I hope I don't have to verify that Phun 'exists'... The display at IDF is 'not' a press release. Intel choose a handful of applications they think represent "Inspiring Innovation". Though Intel isn't exactly Science coverage, they are in this case independent of the displayed applications. My point is that something displayed like this at IDF should be of enough public interest to have a wikipedia page. Another aspect is that the Phun video at Youtube is one of the highest rated and all time most watched in "Science and Technology", and while Youtube isn't at all a source for verification of anything (that I can think of), this at least shows that Phun is of great public interest. Kenbon (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

edu.au
Thanks for the fix to the redirect at edu.au. Tired eyes at the wheel and all... we all suffer from it at times :) Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 12:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Erm
Might I ask why you felt the need to delete the talk page for Scar (The Lion King)? Couldn't you have just removed the vandalism? No offence, I was merely curious. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. Well done. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Avril Lavigne vandal IP block collateral damage
User is asking to have the autoblock lifted from your yearlong block of 82.198.250.74. He does seem to have an indepedent editing history, but I'm not familiar enough with the case to decide whether he's a sock or not. Could you take a look? Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Quick question regarding Titleblacklist
Just a quick question regarding this edit. Did you want to block titles containing "is.stretched.by" from being created? If so, you'd need to use the regex ".*is\.stretched\.by.*, since the "." means "any character" when used as a regex, so your addition would also block "is-stretched-by" or "isAstretchedAby", for example. It's no big deal either way, of course, and you probably know all this already, but I'm just curious. :) --Conti|✉ 01:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Martin John Callanan
As an admin, could you userfy the last proper version of the article Martin John Callanan to a subpage at my usersapce Artlondon (talk) 14:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * thank you Artlondon (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey, thanks
Hey, thanks for reverting my talk page. I don't know what this guy has against me. You got any ideas, or do you think this is just some random troll? Anakinjmt (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

AN/I Protection
Wait wait. Why did you just semprotect that?--Tznkai (talk) 23:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Violation of username policy
Hi,

In the user creation log I just spotted this username that just registered a few minutes. The user also appears to have vandalized today's featured article; see the user's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tiptoety%27s_anus_is_str%C4%97tched_by_%C4%A0rawp%27s_massive_%C4%8Bock. contributions]. Would you be able to put a block on this user?

Thanks, Politizer (talk) 23:38, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Never mind that message, it looks like the user has been blocked. Thanks!  Politizer (talk) 02:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Uh_i_said_suitdozen_created
Thanks for your help with the vandalization of John_Bull_(locomotive); unfortunately the vandal came right back with another username. Could you protect it? Thanks for the help! JoshMcCracken (talk) 03:23, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Never mind, someone caught it JoshMcCracken (talk) 03:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

2008 Chatsworth train collision
This shouldn't be move-protected; there have been several non-vandal moves and there's still discussion on what the best name is. --NE2 12:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

New pages - prodding afding csding
Hey there! I was going over some new pages and i marked a couple of patent nonsense ones as PROD. I am not sure if that is the best thing to do. I notice that the blueberrypie article was speedied. How should i mark an article for speedy? feel free to RTFM me :P, i have obviously not tried to look it up yet. I just saw you putting the speedied notice on the talkpage and thought i might ask before i forget.  Lucifer  (Talk)  21:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Titleblacklist again
Hey, can you explain this edit? I'm a bit confused, since (unless I'm missing something, which very well might be the case) your edit didn't really change the result of the regexes at all. --Conti|✉ 15:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, if you wanted to include punctuation, adding "." isn't the way to go, since "." means "any character" in regular expressions. You could use "\.", but that would only catch "." (Full stop). I don't think there's a way to include all kinds of punctuation without actually writing them all down one by one. --Conti|✉ 15:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop adding things to the title blacklist. The majority of your additions in the past week have been removed because they'll generate false positives. --Carnildo (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

VoiceMeUp
May I request you SALT the page? The creator seems not to understand that deleting a page 4 times is not an invitation to recreate it. Ironholds 23:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Megamidget unblock request
This user is requesting the autoblock you put on be softened to allow them to edit. They look OK ... minimal yet productive edits. But I'll let you decide. Daniel Case (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

DC-8 & 727 page
Maybe you should read the information on aircraft naming conventions everyone is screaming about - the 727 was named the Whisperjet and the DC-8 was named the Jetliner - Davegnz (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I you worked in the airliner industry then the 747 would be called a Whale - the 737 is commonly called a Pig, the 727 a three-holer and the DC-9 a Beercan - the F-16 Falcon for the longest time was called the Viper, and the A-10 is called the Hog - the Manufactures name is what counts and should be used when ever possible Davegnz (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Slug
Explain protection, Sir Lothar (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

RfC/U needing your endorsement
Hi NawlinWiki. Unfortunately, your attempt to encourage Davegnz to seek community input rather than engage in disruptive page moving was unsuccessful, and I have filed an RfC/U to gain input from the wider community on the (unfortunately not isolated) incident. Since I have specifically named you as someone who has unsuccessfully tried in to encourage him to work constructively with others, my version of events requires any corrections you feel are necessary, and then your endorsement. --Rlandmann (talk) 01:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Elevator
Why did you remove that page? I can tell that you did it by a mistake since you restored it afterwards, but I'm curious about why you did that though... TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

"Gary Chan"
Could you please help to recover and send the deleted passage of "Gary Chan" for me? I think someone misuderstood its content, thinking it was meaningless and should be deleted. This "Gary Chan" is the member of Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Please attach its content in my discuss page, thanks! Ricky@36 (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * From the history Special:Undelete/Gary_Chan, it seems to be a misunderstanding. An IP has replaced the content with a NN bio, . No objection that I restore the correct version ? Cenarium  Talk  20:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Mass deletions
Hi, everytime you mass delete a server angel loses its wings. Please think of the server angels. Tiptoety talk 04:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It may have not just been you, the servers have been lagging pretty bad all day today. I just am not sure I see the net positive of doing it. Tiptoety  talk 04:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Deleting revisions to hide vandalism
Would like to request the restoration of the page for Daisy Power. The web series was recently listed among try-able Web serials in The New York Times online blog regarding new media online. http://themedium.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/25/and-more-web-serials/ Daisy Power is listed along with "Roomates", "Ask a Ninja", "Break a Leg" and "Squeegees". Thank you for your consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Windhaven (talk • contribs) 22:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Why are you doing this? Reverting it is sufficient, no? Why delete the whole article, then restore it, just to hide simple, childish vandalism? SQL Query me! 04:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd also ask that you stop doing this. It really is unnecessary. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Regarding your comment on my talkpage regarding this (keeping it here, in one place is fine, by the way, I watch every page I touch), For instance, here there is no link to a malware site, and, wikipedia as you well know, is not censored. What was the point of doing that? SQL Query me!  04:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks like the link was cut off the end of that one because the entry was too long. It's usually there.  And "not censored" means that appropriately adult topics use adult language and illustrations, not that every page's edit summaries include references to massive etc.  NawlinWiki (talk) 04:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair point, however, it's not feasible to remove every edit with a summary that contains some rough language. I'm still not convinced that there is a good reason to be doing this. SQL Query me!  04:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'm in favor of the deletion, simply because the two links he usually provides (see his recent "edit" to Kim Kardashian if you need reminding). The one link is to his entry at E.D., and the other one (nimp) is to a page that will crash your browser. I'm of the opinion that one does not leave a live grenade (i.e., nimp) where the unsuspecting will discover it. Although, if you ask me, better yet would be the ability to somehow redact those links from the edit summary... Tabercil (talk) 04:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd like to request a cease to the selective deletions also. It's obvious vandalism: Preventing someone from copy-pasting or retyping a link at the cost of doing selective deletions isn't worth lagging the project. Instead of doing this, support and encourage the developers and sysadmins in implementing the newer deletion system. If nothing else, someone'll click on a nimp link only once. Kylu (talk) 06:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If I may interject I'm actually quite glad he's doing so in this case. I don't know about you fellows but I'd rather not check an article's history when on my laptop in a public place only to find "HUGE TITS" etc in glaring red on the page for any passerby to notice...--Kung Fu Man (talk) 11:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If I may, where is the discussion on the new deletion system ?  Cenarium  Talk  20:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Malganis
I think this editor should be looked at by an admin. The user page is a ridiculous waste of space and (some/most/all?) edits are vandalism. Thank you, --Hordaland (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

‎Joshua Mark Thomas
You proded a page back in May called Joshua tomas. The page was deleted. This page has appeared again. FYI. PB666 yap 20:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

DELETED ARTICLE.
Hello, Good evening. I would like to ask why did you delete the Article that I have made, RJ REVILLA? It is Notability. It has a media coverage and RELIABLE ONE, (PEP.PH) or in the Philippines it is more popular in the name, Philippine Entertainment Portal or PEP (http://www.pep.ph/news/18852/Another-half-brother-of-Senator-Bong-Revilla-joins-showbiz). IMDB PROFILE. Internet Movie Database Resume, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3108637/. Other REFERENCE TO PROVE: http://telebisyon.net/balita/Isa-pang-anak-ni-Ramon-Revilla-artista-na-rin/artikulo/30358/ http://www.journal.com.ph/index.php?issue=2008-08-24&sec=3&aid=70807 http://www.rjbrevilla.multiply.com http://www.friendster.com/rjbrevilla

Deletion of The Toilet Paper Entrepreneur
Can you offer any suggestions for how I might update this article to be acceptable? I was attempting to provide only verifiable and neutral information (not that it worked, but that's what I was going for). I looked at other examples such as SICP and The World Is Flat. Any tips you could provide would be appreciated. I'm still wrapping my head around all of this. Ben Simon (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Help.
Hello, Good evening. I would like to ask why did you delete the Article that I have made, RJ REVILLA? It is Notability. It has a media coverage and RELIABLE ONE, (PEP.PH) or in the Philippines it is more popular in the name, Philippine Entertainment Portal or PEP (http://www.pep.ph/news/18852/Another-half-brother-of-Senator-Bong-Revilla-joins-showbiz). IMDB PROFILE. Internet Movie Database Resume, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3108637/. Other REFERENCE TO PROVE: http://telebisyon.net/balita/Isa-pang-anak-ni-Ramon-Revilla-artista-na-rin/artikulo/30358/ http://www.journal.com.ph/index.php?issue=2008-08-24&sec=3&aid=70807 http://www.rjbrevilla.multiply.com http://www.friendster.com/rjbrevilla —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjrevilla (talk • contribs) 11:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Swarm of the Lotus
Hi NawlinWiki, you deleted this article a while ago. I wrote about the same subject in German (see de:Swarm of the Lotus), and I guess, it's notable enough for English Wikipedia as well. Could you take another look at the article? If it wasn't complete rubbish, maybe you could restore it and list it as AfD, so there would be a bit of time for improvements. --NoCultureIcons (talk) 14:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the effort. You're probably right, I remember that I wasn't too excited about the sources I had to use for the German article. --NoCultureIcons (talk) 15:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Favor...
Hello, NawlinWiki I would like to ask if you could, just give me the article. I just need to recover the content of it. please. thank you. and i am not writing about my self, i am a third party which writes about rj revilla's biography. thank you!Rj Revilla (talk) 15:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please have your name changed before attempting to recover the article, as suggested on IRC. Glass  Cobra  15:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I tried changing it, however i dont know what happend. do you have to wait, for the approcval? Rj Revilla (talk) 15:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You made your request improperly, and were told to follow the instructions at the top of the page. You also do have to wait until your request is accepted, yes. There is no deadline here, no need to be in any hurry. Glass  Cobra  15:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Marshall Williams2
Hello. I am Marshall Williams2 and someone tried to post a comment on my page. They accidently left a comment on a non-existent page- Marshall Williams2. They meant to leave a comment on User:Marshall Williams2. Marshall T. Williams (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Arlis Perry
Nawlin, as you are currently handling the majority of the CSD requests: What am i supposed to do with this 5 line long article? It might very well be notable, but... Well, just read the first four lines. I assume that once you did, you will understand why i am a bit unsure what to do with it. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 18:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:PRODded. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Quite the unique article really; never ran into anything alike. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 18:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Your Mom and Dad
Thanks for the head's up about my edit getting lost in the process of your fixing the vandalism; too bad it couldn't have been retained, but I bow to your greater experience. I performed an undo on my comment as it's no longer relevant. Happy editing! -- Deborahjay (talk) 21:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD deletions
You recently deleted two discussions at MfD based on the "author" requesting. I don't believe these deletions were appropriate. We almost never delete MfD discussions. In fact, I've been very active on MfD for over a year and I've never seen a discussion deleted before. I think you may have meant to close the MfD's as withdrawn by the nominator. Could you please restore them? Thanks.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 23:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * (moved here from User talk:Doug for unified discussion)
 * Will restore, sorry. --NawlinWiki (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem, thanks. I didn't mean to suggest you did anything wrong by saying they weren't "appropriate", only that they didn't appear procedurally correct.  Cheers. --Doug.(talk • contribs) 00:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Radioweald deletion
This page was deleted earlier toady. It is a perfectaly reasonable thing to be on the wiki very very simialr to OSCAR Radio on which the page was based. I am a member of the project and so have maximum knowledge on it. Could you please confirm in your own words why you deleted it.

Cheers Lordmwa (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Fábio Pereira da Silva
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fábio Pereira da Silva. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. You were one of four admins who deleted this article. I got the request to UNSALT and have listed at DRV since I'm not comfortable enough with WP:ATHLETE to make the call and wanted community discussion since that's what resulted in its deletion. TravellingCari 21:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Movie Reels
You ought to salt it, how many times has it been deleted now? Corvus cornix talk  21:45, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, FYI, there's a DRV for the above at Deletion review/Log/2008 September 25. Cheers.  lifebaka++ 23:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Protection of article needed
Hello, NawlinWiki. I noticed days ago that you indefinitely semi-protected the articles Kelly Ripa and Vanessa L. Williams, making it so that those articles will not be unprotected until another administrator sees fit to unprotect them. Well, I was wondering if you would not mind doing the same for the Jesse McCartney article; it gets way more vandalism and really needs long-term semi-protection more so than those other articles. Flyer22 (talk) 10:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping with that. I really appreciate it. Flyer22 (talk) 03:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Logility
NW, can you fish the deleted content of the first version of Logility out for me and put it into some user space for me? I tagged it for speedy and it was speedied (copy-and-paste from some company PR stuff), but the company is NASDAQ listed and in all probability notable enough for an article. I've restored a stub, but I won't have time to work on it for at least a day - it's high school football game day today. Thanks. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Have a beignet on me. :-) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
Thanks, NawlinWiki, for reverting vandalism to my user page. Cheers, Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 19:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Email
Hey, Nawlin, you've got mail :) Bastique demandez 23:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Dead Confederate?
Hello, I was planning on creating a page for the band Dead Confederate and noticed that this had recently been attempted by another user, only to be deleted by you. You claim that the article did not make clear why the band was notable, but if I were to make an article I would be sure to point out they are scheduled to appear on Late Night with Dave Letterman and recently appeared in Rolling Stone magazine's "10 bands to watch". Additionally, Dead Confederate is signed to "The Artists Organization" label, a label created by Gary Gersh, the same guy who once signed Nirvana and Sonic Youth. If I am sure to outline these things in the article, do you think it fits notability standards? Thank you. TheUnionBlood (talk) 04:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Michael Hsing
Yesterday, an article was created at Michael Hsing, regarding a township councilman and Independent congressional candidate in New Jersey. As it was my view that this individual is non-notable under WP:POLITICIAN, I left a message to that effect on the article's talk page. Today, I went to leave a notice on the talk page of the creator of the article, User talk:Hellokittysun, so that the editor could respond at the article talk page if he/she wishes. At that point I saw your notice, left on August 8, stating that an article about the same person (which had been created by the same editor) had been speedily deleted. Obviously I do not know how the deleted article compared with the current article, but the current article does not resolve the notability issue. I did leave a note for the editor but also mentioned that I am notifying you. I think my comments on the above two talk pages are self-explanatory. Please let me know what you think the appropriate action is. Thanks. Neutron (talk) 22:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleted again, campaign ad. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, that is what I thought would happen, but I did not want to make any assumptions. I am still a little concerned that the editor in question may read your notice (on his/her talk page) and conclude that if the article is rewritten in a neutral and non-promotional manner, it can be re-created (although I see that another admin has now protected it from re-creation) and remain on Wikipedia.  I do not think this is the case, because unless the subject of the article wins the election for Congress (which is very unlikely due to his third-party status), he will remain non-notable, regardless of how neutrally an article about him might be written.  I'm guessing that you did it this way because a deletion for non-notability would require a "prod" or AfD and could not be done by speedy deletion.  If that is your rationale, it seems reasonable, as the speedy deletion is the most efficient means of getting rid of an article that should not be here for several different reasons.  Neutron (talk) 05:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Abusing multiple accounts, hm?
These were all registered around the same time, off-wiki and SUL'd to here.


 * special:contributions/So passes Denethor, son of Ecthelion. (which you blocked)
 * special:contributions/The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
 * special:contributions/Smoke rises from the Mountain of Doom

You may wish to have a CU check the others as well. Kylu (talk) 02:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Whoops, this one just hit the radar: special:contributions/Ghaunadaur's blood-red, giant slug avatar. Kylu (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * special:contributions/Aahh! I'm a monster! - WhenStewieGriffinTeleportedWithATeddyBear - should be on enwp any moment. Kylu (talk) 02:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of DJ Hollygrove
Yes I made the DJ Hollygrove page and saw that it was deleted (13:25, 29 July 2008 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) deleted "DJ Hollygrove" ‎ (A7 (bio): Doesn't indicate importance or significance of a real person: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Hollygrove) I highly contest this due to the fact that this is an well known up and coming DJ from New Orleans who is now in Houston. He is the 1st NEW ORLEANS DJ to screw music (note: see DJ Screw) If you go to (http://music.myspace.com) and search in the genre of turntablism you will see him as the #4 DJ in the nation, and #1 in TX. Also he has more than 55,000 myspace page views, more than 137,000 song plays, and close to 1,000 myspace fans. you can email me @ txsufreak504@yahoo.com if you need more references.. Thank you 22:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.162.228 (talk)


 * See WP:BAND for notability requirements for musical groups/musicians. If you'd like to contest a deletion, register an account first then visit WP:DRV and follow the process there. You'll want to note that decisions are made by consensus, and emotional pleas and vote-stacking will not help change the outcome, only logical discourse and adherence to our policies will. Kylu (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

GreyMatterEchoUKfan
Can you semi-protect The Adventures of Andre and Wally B.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GreyMatterEchoUKfan (talk • contribs) 17:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of PrintGlobe, Inc.
This is a notable company that included legitimate references. There are several comparable printing companies listed on Wikipedia including; Absorbent Ink, Print100, InfoPrint Solutions Company to name a few. I placed {holdon} tag on the article and I would very much appreciate any guidance and assistance you could offer to help make this article encyclopedic. Synapse8(talk)

If the promotional tones are removed and the article is edited accordingly would you evaluate it for possible re-submitting? Thank You, Synapse8(talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC).

Thank you so much, I will do that. Your help is greatly appreciated. Synapse8 (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Update: The article for PrintGlobe, Inc. has been revised. Would you mind reviewing it when you get a chance and advising me to any changes that may need to be implemented before submitting the article? It is posted at User:Synapse8/PrintGlobe Inc. Many Thanks, Synapse8 (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Brotherhood of Battle
Well, I created a reasonable article. I made improvements per the request of others. I created a talk page and made a reasonable argument to contest speedy deletion. Instead, the article was deleted nearly three times in less than five minutes, as well as the talk page, without any reference to the argument made. I also made reference to other existing articles which--over the course of their existence--have grown into solid articles. The deletion is contrary to the spirit of the wiki community and I'm frustrated with the haste of the action as it makes it difficult to improve/create organically. Thanks for listening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cancerstick (talk • contribs) 02:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

T'ankee.
God, I love having a thousand friends. Half Shadow  02:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)