User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 3


 * User Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 1:April-July 2006
 * User Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 2: July-August 2006

Douche?
why did you delete the page about the man/woman connor nelson? It's medical condition is one that may help to cure gays. i have reason to believe that you are a douche who supports gays and the devil. You sir, are a liar and cheat. Good day.

Does this count?
Mr. Nawlin, Would you take a school paper as an independant source? Or a local free news flyer that pubishes information about the indie music scene?

I'm trying.
Mr. Nawlin, The date is a mistake. I thought this was october. The label was actually created in August. I would think that a label that had been able tot ake off this fast within this two month span is worth mentioning.

I'm trying.
Mr. Nawlin, Don't give me your condescending bullshit.

In a bank robbery in oklahoma, a man was trapped inside in a hostage situation. "Where are the cameras?" he asked, "wheres the news?" He was so concerned that this event would not be televised. He was afraid that if it was not on the news that it would never have happened. but it did.

Artshore records is that event. We dont have extensive news coverage, because newspapers dont often write articles about indie record labels. They just dont. I can site flyers, people, posters, venue bulletin boards, and the backs of CDs, but I can give you no news articles. But if you ask me, I shouldn't have to. If this was not a legitimate business, why on earth would I be fighting to keep it up?

Before long we will have the sources to site, but for now, I can give you no news. Please. Leave it be.

I'm trying.
Mr. Nawlin, I would love to establish a more credible article, but you delete it before I can even finish it. Thanks. What sort of references would it take to make you leave it alone? Other than artshores webpage, there is very little web presence, hence the creation of this article. I'll do whatever you ask within reason, but let me assure you, this record label does exist, people have heard of them, and they are legitimate. Web presence is not the only proof of existence.

It wasn't a test.
Mr. Nawlin, The Artshore Records Article WAS NOT a test. It was a legitimate article. I am offended that you would take it down just becuase YOU'VE never heard of us. I can assure you that hundreds in the Orange County area have heard of Artshore, or one of the artists signed to them.

My sincerest appologies
Mr. Nawlin, I am truly sorry for calling you a racist. It is just that when people go around accusing me of making my tribe up, I gte horrifically offended, my tribe tried for years to be recognized as a country's tribe, and finally we triumphed, Malawi accepted us! We were exstatic! If I offended you, I am truly sorry, and I will redo a whole new page on our tribe, once I find a website to site my sources. My whole point was that I just made the page yesterday, and had not gotten a chance to site my sources.

Hmmmm...
That comment is true! How many tribes do you know of, get created in 1995, then almost 11 years later, get to be a tribe of an african country? We are the first that I have heard of.

DELETE ME
DELETE ME! See if give adays care, you do not take into considerationn that the Serozza are a REAL tribe of Malawi (an Eastern African COuntry), which does have a Queen! If there is going to be such racism on this website, then DELETE ME! You people make me sick! Your racism and slers, are what makes this world wrong. Do you even know that there are thousands of Kings and Queens in Africa, not just europe? I suggest that do some research, and get your facts straight! Our new webpage will be up soon, and Just beacause you "think" that I "made this lineage" up, just means that you are a pessimist! Only about 100 out of the like, 100,000 tribes of Africa have any information on their tribes on the internet.

Queen Lucretia I (deleted?)
NawlinWiki, I dont see why you refer to this page as vandalism, I just started it yesterday, and am trying to finish it, that is why there are no sources and it has very little content, but thats why I was working on it this morning. Why do you call it vandalism? Its only a Biographical page? Such as one for the other tribal leaders of Africa?

Fwenty
I spent over an hour on a barely fictional word that has been in existence for years and years. Hundreds of people know about it, and I don't see why you can't spare a few kilobytes for my page. What? Bandwidth problems? Then who had the idea of creating an online encyclopedia? If I have to get a petition for my page, I can assure you I can get at least a hundred people easy. By what basis is the word nonsense? I bet I can name an obscure Indian or African language with only 10 speakers. But of course, that is valid over 100 people. Fwenty is real, its 35, and you shouldn't be so stingy on deciding which pages stay.

Quick question about new article validity
I created a page about an amateur baseball league in Boston, the BMBL, and they run a notable charity event each year, called the 100 Inning Game, to raise money for Curt's Pitch for ALS. Each year, either Curt Schilling or his wife, Ronda Schilling, makes an appearance at this event, and it usually garners a lot of media attention, both local and regional (and occasionally national, such as last year when one of the primary umpires suffered from ALS, which made it a big human-interest story for even the big news outlets), and is the record holder for the longest regulation baseball game ever played (Guiness World Records application still pending). Is this notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article if supported with proper citation? I have created the article at 100 Inning Game and would like you to look at it as it grows (I still need to add a lot more to it, so please allow a few days for me to finish the article) and see if it's notable enough to warrant continued existance. Thank you! -- Ubergenius 16:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Dark Abrahms
Why would you do that? Why would you intentionally delete the article I was working on when I specifically requested the opposite? I gave a reasonable explanation for my point, I think that I at least deserve the same from you. I feel the way you dealt with my article (which IS relevant by the way, look it up) was unfair, unjust, and disappointing.

However, I understand that my article was incomplete, a situation which I was hard a work remedying. I will create a more substantial article on Gregory Mitchell Darr, and hopefully this new one will meet everyone's approval!

The article in question was about a prodigious young con man "Gregory Mitchell Darr". Once again I would like to emphasize that this is NOT an attack page or vanity page. But do not worry if it is unsalvageable; I have the original text saved and can expect several more full pages on the aforementioned topic.

Thanks very much for your consideration, sincerely

I am still unfamiliar with all the conventions. I had planned to add verifiable sources a bit later on as well as adding a whole lot more content. On a side note, little is known about Darr's past; he was orphaned at the age of five. But, hopefully with the input from you and other wikipedians, my next article will be much improved! I will definetely be sure to include my sources and back all of this information up! Thanks again!*
 * Thanks for your corrections and suggestions. As you may have guessed, this is my first wikipedia article, and

Dark Abrahms 21:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Dark Abrahms

Siipola12
you kinda suck huh buddy? deleting peoples work just because you personally find it irrelevent. Encyclopedia: 	'a book or set of books containing articles on various topics, usually in alphabetical arrangement, covering all branches of knowledge'.... any knowledge of subjects can be listed, they dont have to be historical as long as their factual.

Miss Lou Lou
What's going on? I got an A7 - what is taht? I had done so much work on that dern thing.

DARCA
DARCA nyl is from the star wars tales comics he was in about 20 different issues thats where he from

US Agencies
Why revert my edits? I added a reference on the discussion page? Seanjd 02:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I made some more significant changes to the article on the Board of Tea - feel free to correct/check the references on the updated page. Seanjd 06:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Reza rizvi
Good point about the first same sex marriage claim. Erechtheus 16:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Fixed-Wind Aircraft Edit
Thanks for your message. I was not experimenting with the page. There were TWO pages with the same title and if you look at the history, there was a very foul language phrase used in the duplicate page for the fixed-wing aircraft. I removed that and was then trying to re-direct this to the actual fixed-wing aircraft page. Thanks for removing the duplicate page altogether! -) I understand. I will have to learn how to do that! Will look out on the Help section.

User:Egnp
I made the same mistake as you a few weeks back, thought that a user like this was creating fake user pages, when they were, in fact, tagging banned vandals. I made myself look silly by reporting it to AIV (not the first or last time). Seems every day a new username is created to tag the user pages of vandals. Maybe a throwaway username is used to prevent retaliation? I'm guessing it's a sock of some admin or volunteer editor. Fan-1967 18:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Bones for Life rev 2
Since you were the one that caught the original Bones for Life -- Wellness through Movement Intelligence article, would you have time to take a look at the second attempt at the article, Bones for Life? Basically, they're not linking as they did earlier, and are coming up with references after a great deal of prodding to do so. I'd appreciate it if an experienced editor such as yourself could offer some perspective. --Ronz 20:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Strange delete

 * (cur) (last) 2006-08-30T06:21:37 DarknessLord (Talk | contribs | block) (moved Captain Underpants 2: The Attack of the Talking Toilets to *%)
 * 2006-08-31T19:32:50 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "*%" (vandalism)

Did you fall for a vandalistic page move and delete a valid article here? I have no other clue why you or anyone else would want to delete the article - Tdxiang wanted to put it for AfD but got only as far as slapping the afd tag on it. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

let us, you and i, discuss your actions against the large garden bumblebee...
shame on you.

if there were an unattractive award for people who busy themselves stripping the internet of loveliness, i would give it to you. that is all i have to say, really.

sincerely, myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Echolalias (talk • contribs)
 * Response -- not sure what this is about, probably some nonsense article that I speedied. NawlinWiki 03:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

G8
What is g8?-- HamedogTalk|@ 13:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

the deleted & lovely bumblebee business
"The Large Garden bumblebee is most typically a bee, that bumbles around a large garden. However, it could also be a large bee that bumbles around a more modestly proportioned garden."

that was incredible & you are a monster for deleting it. where is your shame? what about bunnies, sir? i ask you: do you delete bunnies in your spare time? i bet you wouldn't have any qualms with deleting bunnies. large garden bumblebee was a little, pink-nosed bunny, quivering under a leaf in the garden that is the internet...his fluffy tail twitching with utter adorableness.

and then you came with your shotgun.
 * Response The above pretty much speaks for itself. NawlinWiki 22:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Response say... just what are you implying by that? if you feel horrible, you should say so.--Echolalias 22:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Response This is the best comment ever.  If being an admin means invoking bunny-wrath, maybe I'll consider it.  -- Merope 20:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR
What is 3RR? VanM 22:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. VanM 22:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Zombies
That article submitted by User:Kitler005, whom you blocked for being vandal-only? It wasn't gibberish. It was a direct copypaste of the first chapter of The Zombie Survival Guide. You may want to reconsider the block. DS 18:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Supriem David Rockefeller
Hello. I noticed that you speedy deleted an article, Supriem David Rockefeller, under CSD a1 as patent nonsense. I am not the author, but last I saw the article, it said "Supriem David Rockefeller is Chairman of S.D. Rockefeller Holdings, Ltd", or something to that effect. I did find this press release: "S.D. Rockefeller Holdings, LTD. Announces Supriem (Bank and Trust Company), The Future of Banking". I also found this MySpace page: SUPRIEM ROCKEFELLER at MySpace. Is this some kind of elaborate hoax? Was the article changed after I saw it? What am I missing? (I am not at all questioning your decision to delete; I'm honestly just curious...) Thanks for your time, Satori Son 19:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. Very weird. -- Satori Son 20:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello i was the author about Supriem David Rockefeller and this is not a hoax is very real here is my msn if you  want to be in contact with me  hamshel@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geniusmx (talk • contribs)

Your speedy deletion of Spherical cow
Not that I disagree with the outcome, but just in case you would like to know: this article was not actually nonsense (see Google results), but a copyvio from that I was just about to tag as such. Best, Sandstein 20:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Socket M
Thanks for taking care of that move for me. jgp TC 11:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Your WP:AIV Comment
Regarding your note on this user, you did not block the user because they 'were not warned', although they were in fact warned at 10:17 (UTC), before they vandalised for the 3rd through 5th times, when they posted abusive images labelled as students and staff in an obvious personal attack. This account seems to be created only for vandalism purposes, I would ask you to reconsider your decision to not immediately block this user. Thank you for your efforts --DanielBC 11:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Your archived talk pages...
...were hosted at Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 2: July-August 2006 instead of User Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 2: July-August 2006. I've moved them to the User Talk namespace and tagged the old articles with db-g6 (which, since you're an admin, you can delete, I guess). I was looking at my article talk space edit count and was confused that you were listed, but it's an easy enough mistake. I hope I didn't step on your toes! Cheers. -- Merope 20:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, since I'm anal about stuff like this (which explains why I'm on Wikipedia), one archive is called "Archive 1" and the other is called "Archive 2: July-August 2006". Maybe you want to name them consistently?  Or ... y'know, not.  Whatever.  Anyway, I'll go back to wikifying articles and leave you alone.  :)  -- Merope 20:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Spherical cow
You recently deleted this page as nonsense, and I though it was too, but your db-speedy tag got in before mine. It was a fun page so I made a copy of it. I now believe it's for real - so I'm recreating it. --Armadillo From Hell 00:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Folse
No problem. Go for it. alpha Chimp (talk) 02:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Very, very nice job on John Folse. :) alpha Chimp (talk) 05:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Numbers need citations
Hi there. I was recently participating in a discussion at Numbers need citations, and was surprised to find the page deleted. I investigated further and discovered that this was due to "g5" of the speedy deletion criteria (created by a sock puppet of a banned user). I'm bringing this to your attention because you were the deleting admin. I've had this happen at least once before (have a talk page suddenly disappear on me), and that time I managed to save the page and debate (if I remember the example, I will provide a link). In this case, I wanted to somehow save the debate that had been taking place on the talk page of this proposed guideline - with a view to adding something of the sort to WP:CITE or a related page. There were some useful comments on that talk page. I'd appreciate any advice on how best to handle this. I've also copied this to User_talk:Mackensen (the CheckUser involved). Thanks. Carcharoth 06:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * A quick update. User:Mackensen has confirmed that this is your responsibility, not his. Hope you can let me know what is best to do here. Oh. I see you've already dealt with it. Hang on. I'll start a new response. Carcharoth 12:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

A response as promised. First, thanks for copying the content out to my subpage, however, I feel that this is not a fully adequate solution for several reasons. Firstly, there is no edit history to that text (just a record that you put it there). This means that the edits I made to that page are no longer in my contributions log. Similarly for other good-faith GFDL contributions to the discussion. I believe that this is not acceptable under the GFDL. For the similar case which I was referring to above, please see the debate that took place here. I would prefer to see a similar process take place here, with the proposed guideline page undeleted, then modified or rejected or redirected to the appropriate place (there are suggestions on the talk page already). This would prevent unintentional recreation (quite possible in good faith in cases like this), and would preserve the debate in the correct location with its full edit history. Please let me know what you think of this proposal. If you think I should try and get policy in general changed on this before requesting this, or taking this to deletion review, I would be happy to do so. Thanks. Carcharoth 12:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. I have a slight problem though. I hope you will be able to advise. I am going to be away for a week soon. Do you think I should start the review anyway, or wait until I can give it my full attention? I'm guessing I should wait really, as I need to gather lots of links together. The deleted stuff will still be undeletable when I get back, right? And the deletion review doesn't have a time by when you have to start the review by does it? On the other hand, my views are pretty much laid out (or could be soon) now, so I could just find out what has happened when I get back. Hmm. Carcharoth 14:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't have time in the end. I'll do it when I get back. Thanks. Carcharoth 07:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Behave
When reverting vandalism, please try not to ride roughshod over other peoples edits by wantonly reverting all changes in between. CiaranG 14:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

niger vandal
I'm sorry, I misread the time of his last vandalism. On the other hand, his talk page does state "This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning." I'll keep monitoring. :-) --Storkk 15:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Wizzerds article
Thanx. I was just putting a delete page template on the article when you deleted it. how do you delete an article without putting the template on it? Thats a useful thing to know. Ilikefood 15:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Newsz
He has a sock called Acacaz. --Dweller 15:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

vote for me
im nominated for system operator (sysop) or admin vote for me please! vote here i love wikipedia and would love it if you voted for me so i can continue to contribute and help out even more! Qrc2006 16:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Lygisaurus
Normally I wouldn't suggest deletion for a scientific category like that, but there's no text in the "article" and there's been no action there since January. Surely that's long enough to wait for text to be added? --Tim4christ17 talk 17:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Corporal Bryce Jeffrey Keller: prod/db-bio question
Hi. I see you reverted my db-bio on the above page back to a prod. I'm fine with that -- but I'd like to know if that's your intention for all nn people with prod tags? I recently changed quite a few (see my contributions - they're all marked obviously) but I don't think they should be changed back wholesale. I'd offer to help with it myself, but I'm off to bed. Please reply on my talk to let me know your response, as I was planning to get to some more people listed with prod tags (thinking I was helping out). I have been trying to keep it uncontroversial... please keep that in mind. Thanks for your time! --Storkk 03:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I was just asked by User:TruthbringerToronto to only add a prod2 tag instead of speedying it. I'll do that from now on, unless I hear more about it from one of you. I also disagree with his assertion that the page should be moved, as that leaves a redirect on WP, but oh well. Thanks for your reply. --Storkk 04:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

‎Kentucky deluxe
Can you take a look at this article and tell me what the proper course of action is? As it stands, it is rubbish. The product may be real, though likely not very notable, but the description is nonsense. At the same time, the db-nonsense tag does not seem appropriate. What are your thoughts? ---Charles 04:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It is certainly a great deal better. Looking at it now, I realize I could have done just what you did, if I had given it some thought.  Thanks. ---Charles 04:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Paul Dacre
I posted a request to block an editor yesterday because of what I perceived as vandalism on the aforementioned article. You said, perhaps rightly, that it's a content dispute and I'm willing to accept that but where do I go from here? The guy is still posting that Paul Dacre is a paedophile, sexist and racist (which I'm quite sure he's not). I'd be glad to be given a little guidance. Paulhinds 12:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Cheers Paulhinds 12:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

From the desk of eastham
ha -- in the time I was writing a tag asking for speedy & protect, you... speedied and protected. fast work. thanks! bikeable (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

From the desk of eastham
Thanks for the quick action on this one. I did not catch the name of the page creator. I was going to post a warning on his talk page for adding nonsense. Is he a constant source of vandalism? ---Charles 17:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Only Path to God
I am still working on this article and it was not yet finished - Could you tell me on which basic you deleted the article? Other religion do have a point to make as well. It would help if you could wait until the article is completed - Why the rush? --Hari Singh 20:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Further to your message, please refer to my comments at Talk:Only_Path_to_God. Many thanks. --Hari Singh 00:52, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of User:Robomaeyhem/Infobox hurricane user
You deleted that page. I'm not exactly sure why, given I tagged Template:Infobox hurricane user as speedy and not its target page. – Chacor 01:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Anyhow, I've asked another admin to undelete it. Cheers. – Chacor 01:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Retra
I have noticed when you closed the above AfD, you did not remove the category template, "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD". By deleting this when closing it pulls the discussion out of the category. I have deleted it from this discussion, but if you could review any other closures you have done recently and remove the tag from them it would be greatly appreicated. Thanks. --Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Serial hoaxer back
Thought you might like to know, the serial hoaxer is back as has created a couple articles. One, Nife Party is a direct re-create (and I've tagged it as such), the other is an album supposedly from that band (Have A Knife Time). Not sure what to do with that one... --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Great work, keep it up! --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Brent Corrigan/Comments‎
I'm pretty sure that creating an article called Brent Corrigan/Comments in the main Wikipedia namespace is an improper way to go about whatever it is that is being done. There's a discussion page on Brent Corrigan for comments, and any personal side project page the author wants to do should probably be done as an adjunct to his own userpage, no? wikipediatrix 05:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The Disney/Barney vandal
aka ... committed further vandalism after your test4 warning. The (3rd) report was dismissed as "inactive vandal". Now... there's no other warning after test4, plus it would go against the credibility of the same test that states "you will be blocked". I had in mind something custom-made such as "You have been identified as a student of Brown Deer School. You are herein requested for the last time to stop vandalizing pages (or maybe leave Wikipedia altogether). Actions against you may include blocking of your IP range and a report with full logs including IP and times of access filed with your school which will be asked to deal with the situation." Yet I have this feeling that that would not be within Wiki policy though, and in fact encourage the vandal to "try me out". What to do? └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 08:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

AND he's back... Same IP. └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 22:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Request for unprotection
Hello, is it possible for you to unprotect User talk:Ya ya ya ya ya ya? His block appears to have expired because he is making more edits. I am trying to post a warning/reply to his accusation on my talk page. Thanks. Green caterpillar 13:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, his block has not expired. Never mind. Green caterpillar 13:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Massive copyvios at Asiatic Cheetah
I understand that the Asiatic cheetah is real, but I thought the article needed to be speedied as a 100% copyvio which included a commercial source in one of the text dumps used. Why is tagging the article with a cleanup tag appropriate when the whole thing needs a complete rewrite due to copyright violations? Jesse Viviano 13:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

deletion of a page
you said id didnt meet WP:Music or something like that...explain what that is, its a band...look them up on google, they have plenty of pages, just because you havent heard of them dosent mean theyre not and also

''Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. An article that fails to even claim that the subject of the article is notable can be speedy deleted under criterion A7, however. A mere claim of notability, even if contested, may avoid deletion under A7 and require a full Article for Deletion process to determine if the subject of the article is notable.''

Superme 22:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

PS. the page was on the damn request list, i was fufilling (sp?) the request i put there that no one else was fufilling(sp?)
 * Note responded on Superme's talk page. NawlinWiki 23:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks i guess
can you help me then, in all honesty i dont know how to work Wikipedia and i dont know A LOT about the band

Superme 23:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Joe Boswell
Don't know if you actually wanted Joe boswell/Joe Boswell deleted, but I didn't see a log for it so I listed it at AFD after the individual removed my prod. - CobaltBlueTony 17:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you! - CobaltBlueTony 19:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Undeletion request
Could you undelete User:Moe Epsilon/monobook.js for me? Thanks! — Moe Epsilon 21:52 September 11 '06
 * Thanks! — Moe Epsilon 21:55 September 11 '06

Brody Ruckus on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Brody Ruckus. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. --Mark Yen 04:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Why did you redirect ?
Why did you redirect Borrisoleigh GAA (Gnevin 15:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC))
 * Owe ok i didnt notice the confusion surrounding it, redirect is best  (Gnevin 15:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC))

Re:email
Many thanks. --Storkk 22:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism revert
No problem. Glad to have helped. – Chacor 04:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

"George Macaca Allen"
For benefit of your misinformed self; please check the number of references here ... already over 28,700 :-)
 * Response -- it's still a redirect created solely to disparage a person, therefore violating WP:NPOV. User blocked. NawlinWiki 14:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Delete input requested
If you have a moment, I'd appreciate you looking into something and giving me an opinion. I prodded a series of local amateur mens' baseball teams in Boston as non-notable. The teams are listed at Boston Men's Baseball League, and an example team is Boston Senators. There is no claim to notability of these individual teams, so I thought prod was appropriate. The prod has been removed on each of them, and the talk page of each contains a note which reads, "I have removed the deletion notice just this once... If an admin determines it is still not worthy of existance, simply readd the deletion notice, I will allow it to go quietly." Would you mind rendering an opinion? Or, should these go to AfD? Thanks! Akradecki 18:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks for the advice. Akradecki 19:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Again, may I ask why this is considered non-notable? While the individual teams may not have specific, recognizable notability, they are a component to a prominent amateur league in Boston, the BMBL. Ubergenius 14:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

An Socach
The fact that you knew An Socach was a real pile of dirt in Scotland makes me feel much stupider and much less like a box of Trivial Pursuit questions, as I used to feel. (No offense.) Not so much of a font of useless knowledge as I am accustomed to claiming, now am I? - CobaltBlueTony 18:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Jordan colley
Recreated! - CobaltBlueTony 18:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Alpha Kappa Nu
I would ask that you consider the subject's history of vandalism of Alpha Phi Alpha, his sockpuppetry, etc. in addition to the wiki definition of Attack Page, which includes creating a page to attack another entity. All is detailed in the RfC on him/her. He has had several IPs and IDs blocked.

thanks for your input. NinjaNubian/Mykungfu/Bobbydoop/Mikeandike specifically created the entry to throw dirt on an organization after admins asked him to cease his/her vandalism on the site of that vandalism. Robotam 20:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Bulldog Chain of Command
Recreated a third time! - CobaltBlueTony 16:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony 16:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi yes I know I personally think the page is neccessary for his extensive work on the rainforests but he is a cousin and has contacted me by email to say it is embarrassing him. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi yes but Jonathan is quite a sensitive guy you know he is well deserving of an article but he feels quite embarrassed by it. I don't know why. I don't want to get in his bad books. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Ban request
You placed a warning on the talk page for IP address 83.101.150.115 and I wanted to let you know that he has once again vandalized the Taboo (film series) page. I've reverted the edit, but I'm not an admin and don't know how to request a ban (except this way). Thanks! Orayzio 02:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Deleting and Locking the Jihen article.
I'd like to protest your locking the 'Jihen' article. Normally it doesn't break the rules, it's just that it keeps getting destoryed by the same user, Saturn Dreamscape. Jihen is a website, but we arn't using wikipedia as a way to promote our site. The owners of Jihen want to use the article to keep track of major events and the like that spawns from Jihen.

People don't like the webmasters' personalites, so they attack us at every chance they get. Anyway, I'd love to talk to you about this. Though, I'm not very good with words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by No-0ne (talk • contribs)


 * Responded on No-0ne's talk page. NawlinWiki 03:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat!
Hi there, NawlinWeekeey (my terrible attempt at a Cajun accent)!

Thank you so much for supporting my RfA! It ended up passing and I'm rather humbled by the support (and a bit surprised that it was snowballed a day early!). Please let me know if I can help you out and I welcome any comments, questions, or advice you wish to share.

Sláinte!  hoopydink Conas tá tú? 04:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:CSD A1
reads: little content is _no_ speedy reason. And the conTEXT is clear. I will look how to expand Wizards of OS 4. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Boston baseball teams
Why did you encourage Akradecki to reprod the baseball team articles? Did you forget that the policy Proposed deletion says that "Articles that have been previously proposed for deletion or undeleted, or discussed on AfD, are clearly contested and are not candidates for prod." Reprodding isn't appropriate except in rare WP:IAR situations; the only one of which I've seen before is someone who deprods while nominating for speedy deletion but the speedy criteria isn't met. Having been deproded before, these all should go to AFD. GRBerry 20:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Why do you keep deleting my band's page? Does wiki have something against local bands?

Deletion of my page!
Why did you delete my band's page? (Blue Faced) Does Wiki have something against local bands?

Deletion of The fun facts of Grandad Mikey
Why did you delete this page? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_fun_facts_of_Grandad_Mikey). It is entirely true, I very much doubt that you are an expert on North Siberian local television. Please can you revert this deletion? Thanks. Arghlookamonkey 13:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, will do Arghlookamonkey 13:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

AfD
You forgot to leave the template on Talk:Martin Sjardijn, which I have now added. Tyrenius 20:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Cameron Douglas
I was trying my hand at reviewing New Pages. Trying to spot and delete the junk as it comes in. Pretty amazing actually. Thanks for pulling the speedy and making a notability claim on C. Douglas. Jdclevenger 05:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

B. Franklin H. S.
I noted that you started the BFHS page. I was class of '77. Were you near that year? Jdclevenger 05:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Martin Snigg
How can an article be recreated if it's been deleted and protected from recreation??? - CobaltBlueTony 13:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Your blocking of 72.29.231.5
Hey, I saw your recent block of 72.29.231.5 for repeated vandalism. I was going to ask about Jill Hennessy being at the keyboard during the time of the vandalism, but I feel that's a stupid question, as this IP belongs to a school. Keep up the good work. --D.F. "Jun Kazama Master" Williams 17:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

too fast!
Can you give me a minute with Trio Mocoto? They sure appear to be a significant band. Friday (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip!
Fortunately, I realized at some point in time that AfDs were not supposed to be blanked, but I apologize for all the ones I managed to blank before that! -Yupik 20:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Intaglio (band)
I noticed you deleted this article, which was created by the same user I warned for spamming. This however did most definitely not fill the criteria (A7) for speedy deletion, as confirmed by Google search for 'Intaglio +"funeral doom"'. Prolog 01:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Responded on Prolog's talk page. NawlinWiki 01:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Image of Pink Man
Hello, I am leaving this message to alert you that I have re-uploaded the this image:. It was under a wiki-unfriendly licence but I have contacted the artist and she has re-licenced it. Thanks! Achoo5000 02:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

not quite sure how to handle this one
We have two editors, and, editing two articles, JGM: The Josh Stattman Gym Managment and The Andrew Dunsing/Josh Stattman Rivalry. I've speedied both articles as nonsense or db-bio/db-group, but they're so verbose they might not immediately be seen as nonsesne, or their content might trigger some non-speedy type reaction from other editors. The two I think are the same person, trying perhaps to dodge around policy. I think your administrative knowledge would be more useful in handling this. Thanks for your time. - CobaltBlueTony 15:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * FWIW, is the same person. Akradecki 15:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

152.163.100.200
NawlinWiki, I have reported the so-called "MOO Vandal" IP who vandalized your Talkpage to the admins. Mariska Hargitay (if the vandal comes from New York) should K.O. him/her, Tekken 2-style now. So you should be able to get some peace. (BTW: The Mariska Hargitay thing was my little joke--I was voicing what she should do to the vandals if SHE were an administrator and caught them vandalizing Wikipedia.) Keep up the good work. --D.F. "Jun Kazama Master" Williams 17:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Jonezetta
A question, you removed a speedy tag I placed on the above article and replaced it with a prod. Your comment is that it asserts nobility, but I do not see it. Could you give me an indication of the assertion. Thanks.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Northcentral University
As you recently did some very good work cleaning-up the issues with the Northcentral University article, you may want to weigh in on the pending AFD for that article. -- 12.106.111.10 18:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

request for input
At your leisure, would you mind commenting on the AfDs on Bradley Laborman, Bradman: The Movie, and Tonight with Bradman? Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony 18:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Chakra
Hello Nawlin

Why would you delete a reference site about chakras: Chakra Power yet leave a lightweight like http://www.donnasworld.net/eng/chakra.html on the list of external links?

Anita 05:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Pick up lines
hi Nawlin

Why was '10 Tricks to Pick Up Chicks' deleted from the list of external links? It is a valid list of 10 pick up tips that many men have found useful!

Anita 05:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Block a user?
Any chance I can get you to exercise a block on ? I've warned him a couple of times for vandalism while doing RC patrolling, and now he's expressed his opinion by vandalizing my user page. Thanks! Akradecki 19:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy and prod tags on your userpage
''I removed these because they were causing your userpage to be listed as a candidate for deletion. NawlinWiki 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)''


 * okay, dude, keep up the good work!!! --Too Cool 08:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Hunterbbq
Have you seen this, User talk:Hunterbbq?--Twintone 00:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Mark Weber
MESSAGE TO ME ON MY TALK PAGE FROM NAWLIN:

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mark Weber, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.adl.org/holocaust/weber.asp. As a copyright violation, Mark Weber appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mark Weber has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Mark Weber. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Mark Weber, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 20:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

MY RESPONSE:

I went back to the website, which had published this highly negative article on Holocaust denier, Mark Weber. There was no mention of copyright anywhere on the website. So now I see there is an assumption of copyright these days. Thanks for 'pointing it out' in your own inimitable, if not inimical, way. However, you seem to be pissing a lot of people off and you might consider having a list of points on you userpage explaining the why's and how's of your editing practices, since apparently your specialty is deleting new articles. It's a steep learning curve and not all of us have the time. It's not clear to me that you followed the cited wikipedia standards in your actions against my article.Proskauer 17:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

---


 * Re: Mark Weber -- I think you will find that any Wikipedia article that is a cut-and-paste from a website will be deleted as a presumed copyright violation, whether or not the website specifically asserts a copyright. See the following notice that now appears at the bottom of every edit screen:

'''Do not copy text from other websites without permission. It will be deleted.'''

Rather than taking the time you took to write me a nasty note, why not rewrite the article in your own words? I have no argument with Mr. Weber's notability, only with the cut-and-paste. NawlinWiki 18:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Not sure my note quite rose to the level of nasty; I was aiming more for "irony with a certain edge" which I had hoped would fall just short of facetiousness. On the other hand, "nasty" is on the polite side of sarcastic so I guess there's some room for us to agree. I should have added that I concede your are maintaining standards on a public-forum encyclopedia, which is probably on the far side of impossible, so credit where credit's due to you.


 * Frankly, I'm not a terribly "visual" person. Nothing wrong with my eyesight that reading glasses won't successfully interfere with, I'm just more auditory, so I tend to miss things on the screen page that others find obvious. Probably there are a lot of people out there like me who don't consider themselves otherwise mentally deficient. Thanks for responding and explaining. I had another article deleted and blocked permanently, recently, on the basis of "lack of notability". This was IMHO a thinly veiled attack on the subject matter -- however neutral the article -- and was also IMO outright censorship and information control. However that's another issue and if you delve more deeply you'll see I have been stuck with one of the most malignant and evil disapprobations imaginable. Yes, even worse than "cigarette smoker", which I don't even do any more. Will get around to writing article later. I'm too busy trying to be humorous.Proskauer 20:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks for edit
wow..you guys are quick, I'll give you that. Thanks for your help, and for the edit. I assume you do that for any page of a personal nature? I may add a personal links page at some point. Is that frowned upon? Or does it simply need to follow a similar format? Thanks for your help. see you. --Sm8900 21:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Please Consider My Situation
Other, highly ignorant users are reversing MY factual information more than three times and aren't discussing why.

My Intents
I am a democratic, rational person. When the views of over 200 organizations and over 100,000 people ACTUALLY exist, I would like them to at least be DISCUSSED and voted upon rather than simply squashed because they're undercurrent. That's why I atteched a note and tried to begin a discussion, which is being completely written off.
 * His pages should be semi protected as he is on a dynamic IP. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  00:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright, I understand. My one wish is that Messianic Judaism be listed for whether or not it MAY be Judaism. That is what I consider NPOV. Either do this, or remove Humanistic "Judaism" and Samaritanism from the main Judaism article. Thank you.


 * Also (and I consider this detestable), why is Messianic Judaism not being listed under the alternative Judaism article anymore? Why was it removed? Please bring it back and stop being an oppressor.

Christopher Ingvaldson‎
Maybe notable, but I have a problem with the article, it's close to being an attack on the person - written by one of his students. e.g. "He is a self admitted nerd,..." and similar commments. --Armadillo From Hell 17:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Does globalsecurity.org fall under US government property?
I knew US Govt was fine for images but I didn't know it extended to articles being copied and pasted, my mistake. –– Lid(Talk) 17:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you, that's all I needed to know. –– Lid(Talk) 17:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Unrelated but can you take a look at Complexxon? I would but I don't have time currently and you're a very good admin and editor. –– Lid(Talk) 17:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Dysart High School
I understand why you removed the Speedy tag, but even the expanded article seems eminently Proddable per Wikipedia is not a directory. --Rrburke 17:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Dominion of British West Florida
I asked fo review (I think I did anyway). The article is not the same as the deleted one, and the orginal basis may no longer apply. I hope I'm following the procedures. :)  Bo 17:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

"360 five"
Who cares if it was made up in college? The phrase has spread quite alot. I don't understand why a explanation of the origin of the phrase can't be available to those who are interested or who want to spread the word.

Fair Enough
I won't do it again. CharlesMartel 15:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)CharlesMartel

Articles for deletion/Ford Motor Company and WP:DENY
You removed the speedy tag on the AFD nomination above. I know WP:DENY isn't a speedy category, but should this vandalism be housed on its own Wikipedia sub page? Sure some bad faith anoms made by drive-bys are, but this is a persistent vandal, the User:Railer_XXX vandals are all sockpuppets of User:NicAgent, whose 2 most common vandalism tactics are page moves, and spurious AFDs. I previously had his two AFDs at Articles for deletion/Islam and Articles for deletion/Islam (second nomination) speedied. Is there any reason to keep the thing? - Hahnch e n 15:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[]
Hi. I'd appreciate a calm and experienced head commenting on this afd. I'm finding it rather perplexing. --Dweller 16:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Fish Tank Clan
all of you guys who are all for deleting stuff that isn't relevant, important, significant from your point of view are nazis. Stop censoring everyone...this isnt China....yes I know there are rules, but you guys take them WAY too far in some cases.Saatana 19:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

First of all that wasnt a personal attack, but was merely a statement that encompasses the attitudes and the people that I have thus far dealt with on Wikipedia. You may not appreciate being called a Nazi, but at least in the censorship aspect of that statement that is an appropriate analogy.Saatana 19:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

I do not think this word means what you think it means.
What you define as morally inappropriate is not the same as what Wikipedia considers inappropriate, or vandalism. I've read the page on vandalism. Have you?

The fact that an issue is not within the moral standards you approve of does not make it unnotable. If we applied your criteria to that page, you would also end up wanting to remove e.g. Dirty Sanchez and coprophilia. But why draw the line there? You could move forward to BDSM, Bisexuality and other silly sexual practices as well. And then, since we don't approve of those things, we should get rid of Abortion as well.

You see the slippery slope you're descending?

GWhitta wrote a valid page, and you yanked it without just cause. I restored it, and you yanked it again. If anyone is guilty of vandalism, it is you.


 * Response: The deletion has nothing to do with morals. You recreated an article that contained no verifiable sources to establish the notability of this alleged sex practice.  We get several articles a day in which kids attempt to dream up the most bizarre sex acts they can and give them a funny name.  The ones that have no sources get deleted.  The ones that do, like Dirty Sanchez, stay. NawlinWiki 21:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

It still fails to meet the criteria for deletion.
One, a simple/quick Google search turns up multiple hits for the term, so it's not something that was invented yesterday.

Two, the article had been marked under the criteria for speedy deletion. It falls under neither.

And last, GWhitta and I are both well over the age of 30, not some bored kids.

Either way, suit yourself.

Zezima
I can't beleive that after five months of campaining to have the Zezima article unprotected with full support of about 15 people, SOMEONE WENT AND PROTECTED IT AGAIN! ARRRRGH! -User:Merlin Storm

How do YOU have the right to decide what is vandalism or the truth???
On a website that invites millions to add their bit to the encyclopedia, how does ONE person have the right to delete your article. I posted an article about a cricket club in Ireland. How is that vandalising wikipedia?? Some of the entries you have created are just as boring as an Irish Cricket Club, but none are vandalism. YOU are on a massive power trip.

How do you know if the cricket club is notable or not within 2 minutes. So by 'notable' you mean 'in google'??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roboconnor (talk • contribs) but you deleted my post after i had wrote 2 lines. I am meant to prove the club is 'notable' in the first sentence?

Reply to message about speedy deletion of companies
Thanks for your advice. I do think that most of those entry do not belong in an encyclopaedia, but I will be more careful with companies! :) Nehwyn 18:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Atom smasher
Plausible enough? Because of a single capital letter? Think about the precedent you are creating. And I won't even comment the fact you have reverted it to a double-redirect. I'm sorry, are you an administrator? —Lesfer (t/c/@) 19:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

help please
could you please editprotect and/or block the user who vandalized the article Podracing? thankx. Ilikefood 00:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Attention, moron -
The article was not ORIGINAL RESEARCH, nor was it ADVOCACY - it was a BILL INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS, part of the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD DickK 04:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Content
How about you address the content of my comment?

Hello?
Are you going to correct your error? DickK 04:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the United States Congress...
who introduced the bill? CONGRESSMAN MARK FOLEY (R-FLORIDA) where was it introduced? THE US FUCKING CONGRESS

never mind. I have better things to do... DickK 04:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

oh yeah - and when was the bill introduced?
July 2006. Laterz, hater DickK 04:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about my testing...
May I have the actual text of the Ritsu Shimizu article. I'd like to save it to my computer. DeadGyroEater 15:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank You :) DeadGyroEater 15:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Hmm...
Any particular reason you deleted my Fuck Off Firth article?

History
Can I at least have my page's code to fix it up and repost it? Contrary to your original message, I wasn't experimenting.

Thanks
Thanks for all your work on Anti-Vandolism stuff lately.--Twintone 20:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Abrasive wear redirect
I see that you redirected Abrasive wear to Abrasive. The term abrasive wear is a specific wear mechanism and is a phrase used in the field of tribology - especially in lubricated components such as machinery and hydraulics.

About Hayward Medical Communications
Hi there! I noticed you removed the copyvio tag by commenting that it does not seem to be an exact copyvio. You're right, they reworded it from first plural to third plural person... is that enough to nullify copyvio? If so, maybe I could use advert...

Illegal Deletion of the Madness Combat article
Did you erased the whole article about Madness Combat? If you did, then why? That was the best article and you deleted for no reason. This is illegal. Best Gamer 29 September 2006

Don't you know it is illegal for you to erase the whole article about Madness Combat? This was the best article. I don't care if you're an "administrator", you are not allowed to delete any article which it is good and must'nt be deleted. You will be permanently banned and not only that, you are forbidden to create your new user. Best Gamer 30 September 2006


 * In Nawlinwiki's absence, could I refer you to this and this which clearly show that the correct AFD procedures were followed before the deletion of the pages relating to Madness Combat. Please try to remain civil when discussing issues with other editors!  Cheers.  Budgiekiller 18:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Benson Ford
I disagree with your removing of the A7 tag and replacing it with a prod tag on the basis that "maybe [he] did something famous". There are many many articles that are deleted under A7 that actually assert importance or notability, though greatly exaggerated, and they are not replaced with prods instead. What we have right now is "here is a man, he's dead, these are his relatives." If he is notable or important the article can be recreated later but the current page shows absolutely no reason why this shouldn't have been a clear cut A7. –– Lid(Talk) 02:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Feedback requested
Hi NawlinWiki, you and I have crossed paths a number of times, especially as I've been doing NP patrolling. A few times, when I've erred, you've been kind enough to correct me and let me know how I should be doing things. Since I've been editing now for about 3 months, I thought it time that I should seek some peer review as a bit of a "check-up", to further improve my contributions to the community (we do this checkup thing a lot in the aviation world I live in...constant improvement is something we live by). Anyway, I know you're rather busy, but if you have a few minutes, I'd appreciate it if you'd stop by Editor review/Akradecki and give me some critical feedback to improve my participation in the project. Thanks! Akradecki 00:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Numbers need citation on deletion review
An editor has I've asked (silly template refers to me in the third person!) for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Numbers need citation. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Carcharoth 13:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I may have found a sockpuppet account
someone keeeps making new articles about bands that no one's ever heard about. Could you please look into this? Thank You. Ilikefood 14:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Update: One of the usernames is "Spineback". I can't remember the other one. Ilikefood 14:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I think he used to put the same pictures for all the bands but I said that the pic kept appearing in all these new articles on the talk page and now I think he's getting sneakier. (if he even is a vandal. I might be wrong anyway.) Ilikefood 14:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, i was wrong. Ilikefood 19:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy speedy
Dang, you're so fast...after I tagged Artists/John Donaldson and was adding nn-warn template to the editor's page, I got an edit conflict notice, only to find that you'd already done the deed and put your tag on it! Keep up the good work! Akradecki 13:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand.
Hello. I'm wondering why you deleted the Bellingham Bulls page. The team was launched this year, and the Wikipedia page was the best compilation of Bulls-related info on the net. The official website isn't up and running yet, and this was a valuable source of information for me. I'm completely new to Wikipedia, so I don't really know how to create or edit a page, but if there was something wrong with the page that you feel needs to be corrected I will certainly try.

gmyoung_98 user blocked
hi there, my editing ability has been autoblocked by you because of some user called joss123, who shares the same IP address. This is because this IP address serves all the schools in the city of Bristol, UK and one of the kids has obviously been messing around in the past. I am a science teacher, and can assure you i won't mess up the system so could you unlock me please? Thanks, email me if there are any problems.

blanking
someone just blanked the new york times article. i dont know how to revert. could you please help? Ilikefood 22:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC) here is there talk page User talk:71.127.207.144 Ilikefood 22:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Bellingham Bulls
What was the justification for deleting this page? --Longman391 05:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the restoration. Can you shed any light onto why it was deleted in the first place? --Longman391 17:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Gotchya. Yeah, all of the 'minor' leagues are pretty major up in this part of the continent. Many of these games have over 3,000 spectators and are televised regionally. You have a great team down there in the Big Easy, though! --Longman391 18:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello!
Good afternoon, my friend. I was looking at newpages and saw your name (woo hoo for protected pages!), and I thought I'd say hello. I can see you're putting your admin tools to good use, and I hope you're enjoying the ability to do so. Also, and unrelated, I hope your family is doing well. -- Kicking222 17:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Snurble grip-thribley
Hi, Sorry the article was not of good enough quality. They are not common - can I re-create the article if I can find more detail? eg I can get a photo of the one on my gaff ketch. Sailorman99 18:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

OK it's a fair cop. Have to see if it gets notable enough for an entry as a fictitious item, as eg Dilithium. Sailorman99 18:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Wow, chill a sec, ask or talk to me will ya?
So. What exactly is wrong with me putting info on me, Kelly Craig, here KellyCraig ?

Others have it, such as Kevin_Mitnick amoung many others.

So why is it those pages are accetable, but mine isnt? Was it taken and I was pushing someone else off? No.

Would you just talk about it before you go deleting things :/

PS: I didnt see your post in my talk area, or I would have posted here before posting the page a second time. So, what do you say to the above? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelly™ (talk • contribs)


 * (signed above and it seems that Kelly™ in not a suitable user name) --Armadillo From Hell 19:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

and I quote...
From this page you gave me. WP:BIO "This is not intended to be an exclusionary list; just because someone doesn't fall into one of these categories doesn't mean an article on the person should automatically be deleted."

Page blanking
From your user page I reverted: STOP BLANKING OUT MY PAGE!!!!!!!!!!! It's useful to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeraglass (talk • contribs) Haven't responded to the user as I don't know what they are talking about, vanity page?-- Andeh 20:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Your deleted Signasty before I could even put a db tag on it! Thanks for being right there on the front lines, and doing such a quick job. Dar-Ape 21:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Userfication-Fuzzymonkey9
Thanks for userfying User:Fuzzymonkey9. I didn't see that that user existed. :-/ Conor H. 04:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)