User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 47

'''This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~).

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first. Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page. Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________________________________________________________

X-Men: First Class
There's a reason why the X-Men: First Class is being named film project instead of film for the time being. Because it's not being filmed yet and acorrding to WP:NFF you can't treat it like a regular film article untile it's being filmed. The Avengers film project and The Hobbit film project are other examples of this. Jhenderson 7 7 7  17:07, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * OK - it was tagged as noncontroversial. Feel free to change it back.  NawlinWiki (talk) 17:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Lives of the Most Eminent Literary and Scientific Men
As a result of a request for comment, Today's featured article () may be protected as any other article would be. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 03:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Gosh, nobody tells me anything around here. ;) Thanks!  Nevertheless, I think that three instances of common schoolkid vandalism over an hour, all quickly reverted, is not enough to semiprotect the article.  Feel free to reprotect if it gets worse.  Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 03:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Another one by our friend writing in arabic
sorry to bother you but I see you have dealt with the others so far, Iran ielts tehran ielts ielts tehran ielts iran he made another copy of it - Mcmatter (talk|contrib) 17:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Nevermind I see you got it - Mcmatter (talk|contrib) 17:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Possible revision needing to be deleted from the history?
Can you please take a look at I have reverted this edit but the contents may be a form of a personal attack and are quite derogatory. Thank you for your time - Mcmatter (talk|contrib) 19:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Suppressed, appeared to be an nasty attack on a real person. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Vell Baria
I was just adding some references to the Vell Baria article (one in the Washington Post, for example) and found that you had deleted the entire article! Can you put it back please? Finding references takes time… Thanks — Hebrides (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

On second thoughts, please userify it as I could try doing a bit of work on referencing it, but I don't want the pressure of time, as life is very busy at present! — Hebrides (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Done, now in your userspace at User:Hebrides/Vell Baria. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) — Hebrides (talk) 21:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Useight/Status
Can you please blank it or unprotect it? Qui has been bothering me about it. Thanks. Useight (talk) 16:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Reduced to semi. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sweet. Thanks, again. Useight (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Changing visibility of Marx article
What does this mean? I am still learning the ins and outs here, so I am wondering. Is it because the article has been a target of vandalism, and if so, what do the changes you are making do? Best wishes, ValenShephard (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm in the process of deleting a long series of personal attacks (going back years) by a single vandal against a living person. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * How does that link in with those articles? ValenShephard (talk) 16:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The vandal posts the attacks, over and over again, on Marx and other related articles. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, makes sense, thanks. ValenShephard (talk) 17:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The article of Marx has been getting alot of vandalism by IP users, is there a way to stop that? ValenShephard (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Recreation of Jonathan Mark
User:Starpointstudio recreated the article Jonathan Mark that you deleted. Wayne Olajuwon chat   20:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion
Can you tell me why delete the page instantly? It has Chinese wiki link. Also I give you a link about it but it is in Chinese. I don't know its English name. Here is the link--Player23 (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I found a English link so please do not delete it.--Player23 (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, we already have a page on this mushroom: Lingzhi mushroom, so I redirected your article. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is largely different from Lingzhi mushroom. It is a unknown lifeform.--Player23 (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you ask someone who know Chinese to verify the article? Thanks.--Player23 (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added a verifiable source.Here is the link--Player23 (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

It is clear, this is a racist attack on Dr. Leigh-Davis for being a black professor. You won’t even allow 15 minutes for anyone to review or add to this page. There are many, many, many, much less notable white professors on this Wikipedia. The media needs to do a report on Wikipedia’s racism. Why don’t you at least let someone, add the references proving there should be a page for Dr. Leigh-Davis? In fact, I just added three credible references, there is no way anyone even had “time” to pull the references and read them. Thereby, why don’t you not only let references be added ; common sense dictates you should allow time for the references to at least be read, and then reviewed. I am requesting IMMEDIATE “deletion review,” and I may even go to the media. Future9 (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Future9Future9 (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delrev
 * This has nothing to do with this person's ethnicity. It has to do with the fact that we can find no sources for the existence of this person - let alone her asserted accomplishments - other than self-created PR releases.  The releases are themselves implausible, in that they don't even indicate that this person has a first name.  In any case, they don't comply with Verifiability.  Find me an independent source (in other words, not a PR release) that demonstrates this person's notability per WP:N, and I'll reconsider.  Until then, feel free to pursue deletion review.  NawlinWiki (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Dr. Leigh-Davis
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dr. Leigh-Davis. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Future9 (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Delrev Restore new article Clearly, you could have not read all the sources in 1.5 minutes, which is how fast you deleted this article. Again, why don’t you allow a chance for more references & sources to be posted?!? Are you afraid of the truth, or just a racist?!? Clearly the reason you lied and cited “vandalism,” is because this is just a racist attack. As evidenced by all the white, less credentialed professors, listed in Wikipedia. This is a drastic improvement over the original. There are NEW sources. Further, the previous articles were not in the proper format, which made it difficult for references to be located. There have always been many references and sources. It is clear, this is a racist attack on Dr. Leigh-Davis for being a black professor. You won’t even allow 15 minutes for anyone to review or add to this page. There are many, many, many, much less notable white professors on this Wikipedia. The media needs to do a report on Wikipedia’s racism. Why don’t you at least let someone, add the references proving there should be a page for Dr. Leigh-Davis? In fact, I just added three credible references, there is no way anyone even had “time” to pull the references and read them. Thereby, why don’t you not only let references be added ; common sense dictates you should allow time for the references to at least be read, and then reviewed. I am requesting IMMEDIATE “deletion review,” and I may even go to the media. Lastly, citing deletion based on "vandalism," is an outright blatant lie. There has been ABSOLUTELY NO VANDALISM. In fact, a completely new article was submitted, with new references and new subject matter. This article was deleted due to racism, and falsely listed as “vandalism.” Future9 (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Future9Future9 (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Rich Cronin
Hi

I just wanted to say thanks for protecting this article.

I don't actually watch this article (never heard of the bloke before today!) but man even Huggle was struggling! That vandalism! I did actually report it to WP:RFPP but I got told there wasn't enough vandalism lol.

Thanks again! --5 albert square (talk) 00:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Yeah, when I googled it I got Twitter as well but Twitter isn't reliable that's why I didn't quote it. But it does sadly look like it's true, if it's more than Twitter saying it now. I've added him to my Watchlist for the time being in case there's any issues with the article later on :) --5 albert square (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, but it looks like he actually did die - see here, for one. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Morse Sakshama
Sorry to bother you, Morse sakshama is a real event here is the link http://morse.sakshama.org , again it is not notable on the internet because its new enough and there have not been more blogging or net activities about it. So please consider it one more time, I created the page just to let people know about it as wiki shares information worldwide. We can discuss it more also please tell me the ways to improve the page. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manud (talk • contribs) 07:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
I have a hang on for Florence House. Please do not delete when it's being edited. It is not promotion or advertising. It's a notable building. Please revisit edited version and provide feedback on how to make it better vs. just deleting. Thank you. I'm new at this but I have a right to contribute, and think Florence House and similar projects most certainly are Wikipedia worthy.

There are sources. Several outside sources listed. I am trying to edit this to make it better, please help me to do this. It's an important building. Give me a minute, please.

Epocrates
I want to start a Wikipedia entry on the medical software Epocrates. The previous webpage on this software was deleted apparently because it was advertising. I don't want to advertise for it, but this is a piece of software that is widely used by physicians-in-training and medical students but it collects and monitors information and sends it to a central database where, some allege, it is sold to pharmaceutical companies. I think this merits an entry.

See http://pharmexec.findpharma.com/pharmexec/Marketing/The-iPhone-as-a-Physician-Resource/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/505159?ref=25 http://epocrates1.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/epocrates1.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1032&p_created=1208366898&p_topview=1 http://www.jfponline.com/pages.asp?aid=1865&UID= T g7 (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, your first and third cited sources appear to be independent. I would say go ahead and create the article as long as you are mindful of WP:V and WP:SPAM.  Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 11:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Morning Call (band)
Why did you delete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Call_(band) ?? They're a legitimate band who was signed to Drive-thru Records, announced Jan 05, 2005. Purevolume pages hosted by Drive-Thru Records: http://web.archive.org/web/20050114012509/http://www.purevolume.com/morningcallmusic http://web.archive.org/web/20060208214450/http://www.purevolume.com/morningcallmusic

http://www.amazon.com/Drive-Thru-Records-Rushmore-Music-Sampler/dp/B0014JZZEW http://www.last.fm/tag/drive-thru+records

Was it some sort of personal vendetta? Or what is the reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.19.188.205 (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * (Talkpage stalker) Please read through WP:MUSIC if the band does not meet the requirements laid out in this policy they will be speedy deleted if you feel that the band does meet these points you can ask for it's reinstatement at WP:REFUND or ask for it to be userfied allowing you and anyone you invite to rewrite it to meet the points in WP:MUSIC. - Mcmatter (talk|contrib) 01:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I sent a request in for you. - 58.168.73.75 (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Located some Odd Vandalism
It appears you have a friend here on Wiki.

Article will be deleted soon, but just stumbled upon that in the history right now and thought you might want a laugh. CycloneGU (talk) 20:42, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

SuperFogeys deletion
Hello NawlinWiki, I noticed your deletion of The SuperFogeys and wanted to ask you a few questions about it. SchuminWeb deleted the page a few days ago based on copyright infringement, but after talking to him, I got the open content parts of the article back to start fresh. Obviously, it's a little disappointing to see it deleted again, but I've looked over your reasoning and, well, I can't argue with it. I'd like to get the article up and running again if I can establish notability, but since I'm still relatively new to the editing scene, I wanted to check with you before making any serious attempts. Would it be appropriate to start a new version of the article if I can establish notability? Along those same lines, SuperFogeys is mentioned on Newsarama and other comic websites. In your opinion, would that be sufficient coverage to establish notability, or would I be pushing it? Sorry to bug you about it, but I don't want to step on anyone's toes, and since you were the one to delete it, it seemed appropriate to ask your advice before giving it another shot. Thanks! Greenhas (talk) 14:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you're going to need sources beyond "comic websites". See generally WP:RS.  Anyway, you might want to consider starting a draft in your userspace at User:Greenhas/The SuperFogeys, and work on it there until you feel it meets WP:WEB.  Let me know if you want the former content moved to your userspace.  Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 14:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help! Greenhas (talk) 14:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for protecting Park51. Ronk01  talk  22:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * But I've a question - did you even look at the edit history? PC won't shut up the automatic edit summaries. —Jeremy  (v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial!) 22:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And I can always blank those. The PC is for when the temporary semiprotect expires.  NawlinWiki (talk) 01:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's still not worthwhile to use PC on Park51. Do I have to inform you of whom exactly is making those edits? —Jeremy  (v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial!) 01:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The pending changes trial was supposed to end over a month ago... Pilif12p :  Yo 01:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Whoops, re: move protection removal
If it was my edit that did that, mea culpa. I didn't think you were around at the time I threw that protect up, so I was trying to step up to bat for you, so to speak. Won't happen again (and hopefully won't NEED to happen again!). - Vianello (Talk) 09:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Multiple Sculpture / Multilateral Sculpture
I removed the prod on The Multiple Sculpture / Multilateral Sculpture as an editor has explicitly objected to deletion on the talk page. Compliance with policy/procedure is the only reason I did this; I have no objection to opening an AfD. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 21:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks


JV Smithy has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

JV Smithy (talk) 21:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Edit filter 17
Hello NawlinWiki. I was taking a look at the edit filter definition after seeing the false hit report on AIAV. It looks like the filter will block new IP editors from editing any of the selected articles, regardless of the actual edit change content (other than the edit_delta check). I think this is picking up edits unrelated to the filter's intent - some good faith edits ( and ) plus many miscellaneous vandalism hits, but I think most of these are the usual random mix of vandalism edits that we tend to get from new IPs. I saw that earlier versions of the filter included content checks on added_lines. Perhaps it would be wise to add these checks back in to the filter as an additional and condition. Cheers. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 00:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Additionally I would point out that old_wikitext is very slow to test against, and as a result we are seeing a massive degradation in performance on that filter. Can it be avoided? -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 00:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Would much prefer to use all article ID numbers, but that doesn't work well on older articles with low numbers - it catches unrelated articles with the same numbers as part of their IDs. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, the old version of the filter had its weaknesses too. It was one of the most complex we'd ever written, and it still wasnt actually stopping the person it was written for, although it did force him to write things like this.   —  Soap  —  01:09, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This vandal has been a challenge. As you can see from the filter, this vandal hits a defined group of articles, and Soap is correct that the prior version wasn't working in that the vandal just kept making minor changes to his vandalism (which is  all vicious attacks on 2 or 3 living people).  I consider the current version of 17 to be a less restrictive alternative to semiprotecting the entire group of articles.  But these comments give me an idea, so check out the change I am about to make.  But please don't post here about it - part of the efficacy of the filter is that the vandal can't see exactly what we're doing.  NawlinWiki (talk) 01:59, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Some suggestions (from someone admittedly unfamiliar with the tool's internals): Since the article filter already narrows down the potential results, perhaps the added_lines filter could be added with a much looser and simpler list than existed before.  That would reduce the false hits.  If placed above the article_id/old_wikitext condition, that might reduce the amount of article that process through the old_wikitext test, reducing overhead.  Also it might be worth comparing the performance between contains_any(old_wikitext, "aaa", "bbb",...,"zzz") and " .  For long lists, a single regex search might be faster than multiple plain text searches.  In the end, I guess the current form is batter than actually semi-protecting a whole class of articles, of letting the sock have their way.  -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 04:06, 17 September 2010 (UTC)  (P.s., now that I've looked at your earlier filter regex, I understand what you mean about the complexity.  Not much you can simplify without loosing functionality.)
 * FYI, we've already confirmed a while back that regexes are faster than contains_any. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 04:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Need Your Help With A Nasty Individual On This Site
I wish to make complaint regarding user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Imperialmint who is constantly removing my article's Salsburgh content for nothing more than malicious intent and badness, and if you want further proof look at my user talk page where he says and i quote "go on a diet", this is surely proof that he is doing it for badness.


 * I've removed the personal attack. Vandal or no, you've no right to call him names. —Jeremy <font color="00008B"> (v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial!) 19:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

You have "fans"
Even on wikisource! feydey (talk) 22:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's just one fan. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:06, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean
You recently closed the page for the band my friends made saying something about "notable". I don't really understand what that means or how I can fix it. I tried reading the links you provided, but they weren't very useful in clearing things up.

Any help would be appreciated.

NecrophiliaBAND (talk) 03:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The same happened to me with the Wooloo page: what is intended as 'notability' ? The organization has been up and running for 8 years, there have been many articles from the artistic press and it is certainly notable, the website having now 15000 users.

Could you kindly help me fixing it?

Thank you.

GiorgiaD (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)GiorgiaD


 * You would need to find reliable independent sources to show the group's notability per WP:ORG. Note that number of members of a website is not necessarily an indication of notability.  NawlinWiki (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

It is more clear now, thank you very much.

GiorgiaD (talk) 12:43, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Unblock request of 71.247.249.238
Hello NawlinWiki. , whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards,  Sandstein   21:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops, my bad. Changed to 1 month block, unblock request declined.  Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Removing view-ability of Cleegkin's edits
I recently saw Cleegkin's edits and thought that they should been deleted permanently so no one accidentally sees them. I know Wikipedia is not censored but this on pages of random politicians. JDDJS (talk) 22:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Thank you. On an unrelated, note, after commenting on this page, I watched and saw the deleted edits, and I can't but wonder what happened? JDDJS (talk) 01:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Wow. I don't see why he goes through all the effort. He must have no life. JDDJS (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what you mean. Those edits are deleted and no longer visible.  Try refreshing your browser.  NawlinWiki (talk) 01:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I know. I didn't see them. I just saw that they were not visible. I was just wondering what and why did they do? JDDJS (talk) 01:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I used WP:REVDEL on them. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * What I mean to ask is why are so many people attacking you? I don't often come across vandalism on user-pages yet in the last 24 hours I've several on your page. Are they targeting you for a specific reason? JDDJS (talk) 20:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's one guy who doesn't like that I delete his vandal edits. He recruits others on 4chan /b/.  NawlinWiki (talk) 22:01, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Radical child activism
I noticed that you deleted this article as an expired WP:PROD. However, the page was deleted just 4 minutes after I placed the PROD tag on it. I'm certainly not going to fight for the article's restoration, given that I thought it should be deleted and I doubt that the subject's topic exists as it was described. But I just wanted to raise the issue with you in case you hadn't intended to delete the page until the full PROD period expired. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

You're Too Fast!
Argh! You beat me to ! Keep up the good work! :)  Set Sail For The Seven Seas   325° 46' 30" NET   21:43, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

False hit on edit filter 58
Hello NW. I noticed a possible false hit. I took close look at the edit, but was unable to identify what might have triggered the hit. Please take a look when you get a chance. Several other filter hits that I looked at were right on. Keep up the good work. -- <font style="color:maroon;">Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 22:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't figured it out, but I think it must have something to do with the other content on that page (a lot of which is dialogue with a banned user's sockpuppets). NawlinWiki (talk) 14:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

"Sinarest" article deletion
Hi Nawlin Wiki,

I created this article hoping I will keep adding medicines that I come across, and the purpose they are used. This would make a good medical library too. Every time a doctor writes me some medicine, I used to think what are all this medicine do? Wikipedia is obviously a wonderful place to give these details.

If the approach I did is not correct, Please let me know what is best way to do. I want to see a whole medicine dictionary. Say: 1. name of a medicine 2. and the purpose the it is supposed to be used, 3. any side effects noticed by its users, 4. Preconditions to use this medicine (say Diabetic patients should not use. Patients with BloodPressure should not use. pregnant women should not use etc...) "Take after food" or "Take before food" etc...

-RK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Arkrishna —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkrishna (talk • contribs) 10:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem with the Sinarest article was that it was written like an advertisement for the product. See WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM.  If you were to repost the article, you would need to write it in a neutral fashion, and would need to cite reliable independent sources to show that the product is notable per WP:N. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Was it Undone?
Report Was it Undone because that Filter wasn't a spam? 96.45.189.228 (talk) 15:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * So Filter 58 is fixed? Thanks 96.45.189.228 (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Datsik
Well, Datsik, Excision and Borgore are all over the Internet, and way more famous than a lot of dubstep producers that do have a wikipedia article. I don't understand how they could qualify as not notable, everybody knows them. Nobody's ever heard of, like, 2562, Appleblim, or Burial (randomly picked from the List of dubstep musicians article). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davezoid (talk • contribs) 16:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You need to find reliable independent sources that show that Datsik is notable per WP:MUSIC. If you can, feel free to repost.  I'll look at the other articles you mentioned.  NawlinWiki (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The articles on 2562 and Burial are supported by reliable independent sources. Appleblim is a redirect to an article on a label.  NawlinWiki (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry but you are so far up your own ass on this one Nawlin. This is certainly not a wiki that should have been removed and I hope you see the error of your ways soon. Seriously, go check out Datsik. You're making a lot of people angry with this. -Ex-user Skaterblo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.244.145 (talk) 17:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Foofnscoops
I noticed that you speedy deleted ToonTV which was created by Foofnscoops. This editor also created Harry and His Bucket Full of Dinosaurs the Sequel, which I have proded. Do you think it also meets G3 or A7? This editor may also be editing under 65.211.97.242. This editor also created Alans and Mosku which is now up for deletion at Articles for deletion/Alans and Mosku. Something seems off... Novaseminary (talk) 02:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * All gone now. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

XSketch deletion
Can you please give me an explanation as to why the article is deleted without any communication with the original creator. And also, if you must insist on deleting it, can you at least give me the text of what I have written back? Kinkreet (talk) 02:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Advice
Hi, I am looking for ways to get more involved and help out here. Any pointers you could give would be appreciated =). Thanks in advance. <font color="pink" face="Comic Sans MS">♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:33, 1 October 2010 (UTC)