User talk:Nayah116/sandbox

Article evaluation
Health equity The majority of this article contained relevant information, even if it was background information required to delve into more complex topics such as disparities in healthcare quality between different races. Several of the cited sources could be considered outdated as they were published in the 1990's and early 2000's. Current issues related to this topic are missing, and it would provide a more modern perspective on this topic. The article as a whole seemed fairly neutral, with a few statements that expressed an opinion. The idea that healthcare must be improved worldwide was most definitely expressed, but other side of the argument was not necessarily acknowledged; in the United States, there is a belief of some that healthcare is a privilege. Although this article does not acknowledge this viewpoint, the extent of research and sources cited allows for the viewpoint to be countered indirectly. The majority of links provided were working, and led to several academic journals with extensive research. Most statements were accompanied with a link or source, except clarifying sentences that explained a previous statement. The sources are a mix of academic journals, studies and other articles. The only mention of fixing this article was about the external links and how to cite them. The article is rated as a B-Class article, and the discussions are merged with the "Health Inequality" page. The depth of information in this article is more complex than what has been discussed in class. This article also discusses health care inequity by country, whereas the majority of conversations in class were on more of a local, United States, level. A question I have after reading this article would be "How can we ensure that people of all socioeconomic classes are able to receive adequate healthcare in order to thrive?" --Nayah116 (talk) 05:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Nayah Patel

Feedback
Nayah, this is the backstage area of your sandbox. Use the actual sandbox for this kind of work. Well done covering the evaluation thoroughly! - Kquave (talk) 19:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Henry's feedback
Hi,

This is a nice start! I think the information you are planning to add is informative and would complement the entire piece. I think you should add a few specific study examples, involving minority groups, that essentially shed light on to the "why" many have a distrust in modern day medicine and doctors. Also, I think including other sources would also work to strengthen your piece as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryasulin18 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)