User talk:Nayellehs

July 2020
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Good News Mission have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Deceptive edit summaries
Whitewashing content and adding promotion is not 'fixing typographical errors'. If you use deceptive edit summaries again, or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia further, you will be blocked. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC).

Allowing someone to blast an organization that you know nothing about and a person you know nothing about in truth is unlawful. Dear Bishon, please check the information about the organization Good News Mission and Pastor Ock Soo Park if what you have telling the world is correct and is not just someone's opinions and misunderstanding. Be careful that what you are telling the world is erroneous and fictional. Be careful, if not reviewed and corrected, we may be forced to take legal action. Nayellehs (talk) 20:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Base on the erroneous information I saw on Wikipedia about Pastor Ock Soo Park and Good News Mission and the IYF, my respect and trust for wikipedia has dropped. The credibility of Wikipedia will fall continually if you persist in allowing these kinds of information on your site. You were so quick to cut me down, but because you know nothing of the Good News Mission, you ignorantly allowed destruction of someone's character on your site and call it information. I am disappointed. This will not be left alone. Nayellehs (talk) 20:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi - are you connected with the subject in any way? You should probably familiarise yourself with our guidelines on editing where you have a conflict of interest. The idea is for neutral editors to write about any subject, rather than people who are closely involved with the subject. Girth Summit  (blether)  21:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

How come you are so sure that the person who wrote before is unrelated. I read what that person wrote, it was very personal in many places. They were trying to be objective, but failed. I warning you. The persons that you are writing about are alive and well. They are not dead or mannequins. Your credibility as a source of correct information will fall. This is just the beginning. I think your guidelines are one-sided. How come you allow such subjective material to be on tour website? I really respected Wikipedia, but I am so disappointed. The words used are written as fact when it is not. As I shared what I discovered today with my colleagues, everyone is shocked that Wikipedia is a false source of information. People are already losing trust. Nayellehs (talk) 01:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , what I do know is that you were misrepresenting sources, and lying about what you were doing in your edit summaries. I don't know anything about the other authors of this page, but if you do that again your account will be blocked. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)