User talk:Nazarbaevax

Welcome!
Hi Nazarbaevax! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:



Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, Nazarbaevax, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

First of all I'm not changing the history as I want it to be, I'm trying to transform the history into its real form, I'm a student of history and turkology and its clear that I have competent knowledge about history and turkology. Have you tried browsing the source of the information I keep deleting? You will see that its illogical. Above the information, there is a source from a history book written in that period, but then they reject the history book written in that period with an uncertain source. The rules you make are completely meaningless and date doesnt change within the framework of the rules, history is information and cannot be changed. If I violate the rules, this cant be the result of historical information change. I have been following Wikipedia for a long time and there are dozens more wrong information about the Turks that I have detected, all of them are strangely defended by Iranians, there is a theft movement against Turkic culture history and heritage, this is a knowledge site, not a place where the majority or rules can change history. Know your limits and stop cheating people. Nazarbaevax (talk) 16:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) Wikipedia doesn't care about the IRL credentials of its users, including yours and mines. Articles are written using reliable sources, one which you have tried to remove.
 * 2) When someone reverts an edit of yours, you should bring your concerns to the talk page of the article per WP:BRD in order to reach WP:CONSENSUS (i.e. agreement, through counter-sources) for your edit. So far you've made 4 reverts---), this is edit-warring and usually/often results in a block. I highly recommend not to revert again.
 * 3) You have created another account in order to pursue the same disruptive concerns (removing a RS source without discussion/through edit warring) on the same article (Göktürks). This once again, constitutes textbook disruption as per Wikipedia's guidelines (including WP:SOCK).
 * ---> In short; go to the talk page, and create a section where you explain with RS counter-sources as for why that source written by professor David Christian (clear RS) should be removed. I'm willing to assume good faith, but so far, per the compelling evidence, you've made nothing but disruptive edits on the page in question. Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Göktürks; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wario-Man (talk) 16:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

First of all I'm not changing the history as I want it to be, I'm trying to transform the history into its real form, I'm a student of history and turkology and its clear that I have competent knowledge about history and turkology. Have you tried browsing the source of the information I keep deleting? You will see that its illogical. Above the information, there is a source from a history book written in that period, but then they reject the history book written in that period with an uncertain source. The rules you make are completely meaningless and date doesnt change within the framework of the rules, history is information and cannot be changed. If I violate the rules, this cant be the result of historical information change. I have been following Wikipedia for a long time and there are dozens more wrong information about the Turks that I have detected, all of them are strangely defended by Iranians, there is a theft movement against Turkic culture history and heritage, this is a knowledge site, not a place where the majority or rules can change history. Know your limits and stop cheating people. Nazarbaevax (talk) 16:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)