User talk:Nazcheema

Welcome!
Hello, Nazcheema, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister  talk  22:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, SwisterTwister. I am finding things fairly easy so far but will ask for help if I get stuck. Thank you again.  Naz  talk  13:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC) 22:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chittagong Division cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niaz Morshed (cricketer). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have completed the disambiguation. This sort of message is very useful and I hope to receive more because I believe all links should take the reader directly to the correct target article. Thank you again.  Naz  talk  11:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of cricket in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raqibul Hasan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have provided the correct link to the player's article. Naz  &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  16:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

GA assessment of Shore Line East
I appreciate you taking the review. Mackensen and I have fixed the missing citations that you gave as the reason for your immediate fail. Would you consider re-reviewing the article this this fixed? Thank you, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Pi.1415926535, Mackensen. If you would be renominating the article at GAN I will be very happy to be reviewing it again. Please to let me know when it has been relisted. Thank you. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  06:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I have renominated it. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the quick review, and the kind words! I may indeed nominate it for FA. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Pi.1415926535. Wishing you every success at FA. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  05:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit to Crease (cricket)
Hi Naz, It wasn't a mistake or practise. It was fixing the malformed image block where the widths="250px" text is leaking onto the page. The empty quotes stop this and make the image appear as presumably intended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.156.156.69 (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have restored your edit. Thank you for the explanation. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  14:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello there
Regarding your thread at AN/I, I feel I have been more forceful then otherwise necessary. The complaint you took to AN/I was fair enough, I would perhaps suggest that when at AN/I if somebody makes a suggestion or request to take it on board, so long as it is reasonable. I cannot close the discussion for several reasons the primary one being my involvement in the discussion, we'll see whether you get other opinions or if an admin or non-admin performs the close. Sorry if you felt under attack, have a nice day and happy editing. Mr rnddude (talk) 21:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Mr rnddude, that is a very kind message from you. I am mainly concerned that the IP might be a vandal seeking to disrupt our discussion by insulting the subject to be stirring up trouble. As I am living in London I know nothing of the current Mr O'Reilly and can only be commenting on the importance to the cricket coverage in the encyclopaedia of the bowler Bill O'Reilly whose status in cricket would be equivalent to that of the man Walter Johnson in baseball, of whom I was told by an American friend. Thank you again, Mr rnddude and I am hoping you too will continue to enjoy your editing. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  09:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/W. G. Grace in the 1878 English cricket season at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I have completed step 3 now. Did you know it is that I am finding it a complicated process?! Thank you. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  16:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Bangladesh premier league
Dude you reported me for editing the Bpl t20 page. I have not done anything wrong, Bpl t20 is not the 2nd most watched cricket league in the world and I rightly changed that Ekansh95 (talk) 19:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for W. G. Grace in the 1878 English cricket season
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * @Graeme Bartlett. Thank you, Graeme. I am very pleased to have made a contribution. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  17:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Cric force on bangladesh cricket
Hi, Iam tigerbill44 and I am definitely intersted in joining the task force. with regards, Togerbill44.
 * @TigerBill44. Hi, TigerBill. If you are going to the participants section here, you can be adding your name. I can do it for you if you are wishing I should. Thank you, TigerBill, and happy editing on Bangladesh cricket. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  11:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Rameez Raja
Hi: I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit on the Rameez Raja talk page; it was a good faith edit so that it sorts properly in the Biography articles of living people category. Thanks --FeanorStar7 08:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * @User:FeanorStar7. Hi, FeanorStar7. It must be appearing to you that I have reverted you but in fact I am in process of correcting some 400 talk pages where listas parameter is incorrect for names of Bangladeshi and Pakistani cricketers. In those countries, custom is to be sorting by whole name and not by surname as in England or America. Therefore, Rameez Raja is sorted as written and not as Raja, Rameez. We do not have surname as English names are having so while Smith, John is correct sorting but Raja, Rameez is incorrect. Please to let me know if you are needing more explanation but it is all being due to custom in Islamic countries. I am needing names to be sorting correctly for the purposes of our Bangladesh cricket task force. I am hoping this is useful. Thank you, FeanorStar7. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  09:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Nazcheema: thanks very much for the detailed explanation. I agree with you; I usually tend to avoid updating the listas parameter with names like these (especially if I don't know the language), but the original sorting was (cricketer), Raja, Rameez (I think); which is I why I had tried to correct it.--FeanorStar7 09:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, FeanorStar7. I am glad I have been able to explain it. I have added full title to |listas parameter in this case because there is another (much more famous) Rameez Raja. Thank you again, FeanorStar7. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  09:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

A small thought for TFDs
Hello, I saw your recent nominations at today's TFD nominations, and I thought I would comment. If you are nominating multiple templates for identical reasons, it is best to combine them into one nomination so other users do not have to make the same !vote four or five times. Of course, if you feel that some of the templates in a group like that might survive, you are welcome to nominate them separately, but in general grouping is preferred. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Primefac. Yes, you are of course correct and I should be combining these. My apologies. I have not been nominating templates previously and only a few articles, I should have been thinking that there may be a way to combine so this is a good learning point and I am always grateful to anyone who can be helping me to learn. Thank you, Primefac. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  08:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Bangladesh national under-23 cricket team. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Muffled Pocketed  09:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1947 English cricket season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1947 English cricket season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1947 English cricket season
The article 1947 English cricket season you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1947 English cricket season for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1979 in Bangladeshi cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1979 in Bangladeshi cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cricket in Sri Lanka by province has been nominated for renaming
Category:Cricket in Sri Lanka by province has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Categories by locality in Bangladesh


A tag has been placed on Category:Categories by locality in Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Under-19 cricketers by nationality


A tag has been placed on Category:Under-19 cricketers by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 13:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Under-19 cricketers


A tag has been placed on Category:Under-19 cricketers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Bangladesh under-23 cricketers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Bangladesh under-23 cricketers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Category:Under-23 cricket teams has been nominated for deletion
Category:Under-23 cricket teams has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC)