User talk:Nbaker92

Note re: administrative ruling in effect
Neutralitytalk 05:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Left-wing politics has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. "adding minor details' when the major part of your edit was deleting sourced text was misleading. Doug Weller  talk 12:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Nbaker92! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jon Ossoff. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Read the talk page before posting, please
Regarding your edit to Talk:Parler, there are already multiple sections for this issue. If you have something to contribute, do so, but note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a democracy. Arguments should be based on policy. Grayfell (talk) 21:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Marjorie Taylor Greene; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Note that you are not entitled to three reverts, it's just that a 4th is generally an automatic block. You can be blocked for editwarring if you try for 3 reverts a day. Use the talk page. Doug Weller talk 15:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Parler
No one is "silencing" you. There have been multiple redundant conversations about the term "antisemitism" in the article, and starting a new section that shows you haven't read any of the others (despite already being told about these discussions on your talk page above) is not helpful to anyone. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Parler, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia."There is literally ZERO evidence for this. The only reason this asinine claim would even be included here is severe left-wing bias!" Doug Weller  talk 15:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Parler, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI_JS_signature_icon_LTR.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Parler, you may be blocked from editing. – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 06:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Parler. – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 07:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)