User talk:Nbremaud

Speedy deletion nomination of Artecombo


A tag has been placed on Artecombo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Strikerforce (talk) 14:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Artecombo
It's not just a matter of informing people. I've removed the promotional bit from the tag, but you must comply with Wikipedia's verifiability requirements. Your own website is OK as an external link, but you must have some independent referencing too. Please see WP:V and WP:RS. WP:BAND might apply too, but we don't expect you to have a record in the charts... Some independent coverage in the press (not blogs etc - and not just a brief 'xxx also played' mention). If the article is deleted, I can put a copy of it into your userspace for further work. Please contact me on my talk page if you need this. Peridon (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Artecombo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artecombo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Artecombo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Strikerforce (talk) 02:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)