User talk:Nc1172

Hey Nicole, Do you think it'd be cool if we condense the definition section so that it's not so choppy. Perhaps we don't need to really delve so deep into the different definitions. I just remember the professor saying that it's helpful to think of someone hearing it mentioned on a bus, not having any knowledge of it, and then looking at the page for a quick definition, intro, and background info.

Let me know your thoughts.

Madison Mtabersmith (talk) 13:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

We could do that, I don't mind. I just want it to be as well researched as possible and if someone doesn't like a certain source, they can find another all on the same page.

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Swiss army jet.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Swiss army jet.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:58, 25 April 2014 (UTC)