User talk:Ncharoen

June 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Michael F. Holick has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michael F. Holick was changed by Ncharoen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974908 on 2020-06-22T20:42:07+00:00

Editing with a conflict of interest
Hello, Ncharoen. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources
In your most recent edit to Michael F. Holick you wrote in the edit summary that all information had been verified with Dr. Holick. That's not how we do here at Wikipedia. Instead, we rely on information available from reliable sources. Also, we work by consensus. You can get by making small changes to an article without discussion, but when you expand the article to 10x its original size, you'd better be prepared to discuss such an extensive edit. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 00:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)