User talk:Nd22 32

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. JBW (talk) 21:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Who do you think you are and what authority are you so desperately clinging too. Nd22 32 (talk) 21:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Since you ask, I think I'm a Wikipedia administrator, and don't think I'm desperately clunging to anything. JBW (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Unbroken Chain (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * To be honest because it seems completely objectively tyrannical. I am not just throwing insults around. It's much easier to talk to you with the above comment than the immediate ban you seem to put on anybody who says something you do not like. Why not have a rational conversation first instead of these rash actions. Nd22 32 (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * These edits [], [] is good. This edit [] bad. Where does the source say he got the post winning basketball? We need a WP:RS. Unbroken Chain (talk) 22:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are  not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JBW (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * All information was accurate and backed by valid sources. Go spend your time policing real misinformation. RealTruthsOnly (talk) 01:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

You still have access to editing this page to give you an opportunity to request an unblock, not for other purposes. If you continue to use talk page access to post nonsense then that access will be removed. JBW (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * JBW Please why are you acting this way. Why can't we have a rational conversation, talk this out. Many of my former edits were completely valid. I did not make a single false claim in any of my former edits. I'm just disappointed that this is how mods on wikipedia use their power. Nd22 32 (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Chicken nuggets? Seriously?JBW (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I hadn't said a thing about chicken nuggets in my edits? I think you might be mistaking me for a different editor or a clumped a bunch of editors into one it appears. Sad that research wasn't done earlier. Nd22 32 (talk) 22:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I think "Why can't we have a rational conversation" is pretty rich, coming after your posts on my talk page. However, I'll ignore that, and give you the benefit of the doubt on your other editing, and unblock your account. JBW (talk) 22:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think an account with the initials for Notre Dame, created to stuff a bunch of negative content into the biography of the president of the University of Notre Dame is pretty WP:NOTHERE, especially given the vandalism from editing from the same range following this account's block, but we'll see I suppose.. --  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think its pretty rich you expect somebody to respond so graciously to getting blocked and accuse me of making that edits that I literally have not made. I would respect you giving me the benefit of the doubt, but really it only seems fair considering I have done little wrong. Nd22 32 (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

User:JBW we need to figure out which account they will be editing from, see User:Nd2023. Unbroken Chain (talk) 22:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * User:Ponyo is it possible User:RealTruthsOnly is also one of the socks? See [] and []. Unbroken Chain (talk) 22:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There's a handful of throw away accounts used to vanadlize the article, which has now been protected. Giving too much time and energy to edits and accounts like this is not advised.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I literally had not written anything that was not true. There literally is a rumor regarding the subjects election. This other account seemed to be making an irrational truth claim. The way I have been treated on this encyclopedia is truly quite sad. Nd22 32 (talk) 23:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Once again, my information was accurately verified. additionally, no real reasoning was given to disprove my sources. RealTruthsOnly (talk) 01:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Nd2023 is not my account, nor are they an associate of mine. I'd rather you not generalize me, it seems rather inappropriate. Nd22 32 (talk) 22:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)