User talk:Ndavi36/sandbox

Evaluating an Article
You have lots of good options. I see you added "Robotic Pet" to the dashboard, so I assume that's your top choice. It should be easy to improve. Start collecting some sources and post the citations in your sandbox. Josef Horáček (talk) 20:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Excellent sources. If you create one-to-two sentence summaries of each of source and add them to the article along with the citations, that would be a substantial contribution. Be sure to use your own words when you summarize. Develop your summaries in the sandbox and then go ahead and make the changes in the mainspace. Josef Horáček (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I also noticed that you started editing the article. Moving the sentence about the Roomba to a separate paragraph was a good choice. I think you could go further and delete the sentence because the Roomba is not a pet. Josef Horáček (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Final Assessment
A great improvement to the article. I see that you added substantial new text, two credible sources, and relevant internal links. You also deleted irrelevant information as I suggested. There are a few minor mechanical errors (hyphenation), and some might say that your text still reads too much like a promotion. Josef Horáček (talk) 19:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)