User talk:Ndefeis

Welcome!

 * }

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Bill Cunningham Show has been reverted. Your edit here to The Bill Cunningham Show was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/#!/BillCunninghamS) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Bill Cunningham Show logo -- please clarify
Hello, Ndefeis. I see that you made the same change to File:Bill Cunningham Show logo.jpg that I reverted once before. While I do not put who you claim to be in question, I do not understand the nature of the change relative to the notes that you provided. 1) The new source that you provide appears to me to be the same logo only with a blue background. As I stated in my description notes when reverting your change, such a change by itself is incorrect. The purpose of the source link is to show where the image that I provided came from; it did not come from the new location that you provided even if the image looks the same. Furthermore, your edit does not actively affect the image currently being displayed on Wikipedia. A new image has to be physically uploaded to this site for any pages to display it. 2) A change in the solid background color only (as is shown in the is likely not necessary to convey the actual text-only logo itself. The image from which I pulled the logo from was selected because it was large and clean. I wanted to provide a logo at least 300 pixels wide regardless of the color of the background. Are there plan of introducing an entirely new graphic-image and/or font- and text-style for the logo in the near future? That is the implication I drew from your notes. Finally Note: I am assuming all of this as information you possibly do not know as a new user. Again, I request clarification on the change that you made. You can provide it below this message by editing this page or by posting a reply on my talk page. Thank you. — CobraWiki ( jabber 17:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * (in response to your post on my talk page) Sorry, but I do not give out personal contact information publicly. Beside, though it may seem like a more difficult system. it's usually better to discuss changes about Wikipedia on pages like this instead. — CobraWiki ( jabber 19:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
You will soon get used to it.

Charles (talk) 21:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Replaceable fair use File:Bill Cunninghamshowimage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bill Cunninghamshowimage.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Template:Infobox television/doc was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 04:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Bill Cunninghamshowwiki.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bill Cunninghamshowwiki.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)