User talk:Ndjima


 * I'm just practicing. Is this how you sent me the initial message? -- Lookwhatimook (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
Hi Ndjima, here are my thoughts about your edit to Telehealth:
 * You say medical abortion in the first paragraph and then medication abortion in the second paragraph. I would either stick to consistent terminology or make it explicit that these are synonymous terms
 * You added an external link to Gynuity Health Projects. External links should generally not be placed in the body of an article. You can have no link or add a redlink there (Gynuity Health Projects) to let other readers/editors know that the article doesn't exist but could be created.
 * You have a regional focus, but this article is supposed to have a worldwide scope. Are telehealth abortions done anywhere else in the world? See if you can make the coverage more balanced.
 * You are citing a primary source for biomedical content, which is a red flag. This study is not a secondary source (it was written by the people who themselves conducted the study. Thus, it cannot be used to say . If you want to say that telabortions are safe and effective, it is mandatory that you use a secondary source. Otherwise, this content has to be removed promptly.

Let me know if you have questions. Thanks, Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)