User talk:Ndorairajan

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 15:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Raja Rajan Gopaldas
I've added the "prod" template to the article Raja Rajan Gopaldas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Raja Rajan Gopaldas. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. -- Kinu t /c  15:48, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * there are alot many articles in the wikipedia which dont deserve to be on it. Look up e.g. Rohit Sharma reveals a cricket player who made it on to the Indian cricket team. There are so many players who make it to the team and this player just has one accomplishment on a particular match which I dont think would be considered for being on an online encyclopedia. I dont think this even qualified him for that. The system appears to be biased into sports and other things. But not in academics. If this article is considered for deletion then so should the other article be.
 * The existence of one article does not justify the existence of another. If you feel an article does not belong, then feel free to nominate those articles for deletion. However, please base it on policy, so that you are not accused of violating WP:POINT. -- Kinu  t/c (éŕ) 19:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)