User talk:Ndr2byu

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joseph Smith, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joseph Smith was changed by Ndr2byu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851707 on 2012-02-06T01:09:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.A Sniper (talk) 09:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Joseph Smith revisited
Ndr2byu, I would suggest trying to use BYU Studies articles in editing the article on Joseph Smith. Also remember, we are not going to remove all the attacks on Joseph Smith in the article. Focus on the use of inflamatory and unbalanced language. Also, focus on sources. However do not let those who attack your reasonable attempts, using what are clearly secondary sources, get to you. Keep up the work and focus on specifics. Right now the big question they have not appressed is why there is such an excessively long lead to the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)