User talk:Neallearner

deletion
Firstly, apologies for the tag, it wasn't an attack page, but I hit the wrong item. In general, it's not a dreadful article, but it's unsourced lacks links to other Wikipedia pages, and just seems to have been cut-and-pasted from somewhere, so it just doesn't read like a neutral encyclopaedia article  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The article independent verifiable sources to show that it is factually correct and that it meets the notability guidelines..
 * It also reads as if it is copied from a website, and may be a copyright violation unless the website releases its text as public domain or similar.
 * It is written in a promotional way. Encyclopaedia articles don't give contact details (incidentally, note that "national" should be "US" - not everyone is American.
 * develop and provide a wide range of clinical, educational and business services on behalf of the more than 200 million Americans covered by a pharmacy benefit. Evidence? What's a pharmacy benefit, means nothing to me, but I assume it's a prescription or similar to take to get your medication?
 * Why is there a list of directors when none seem to be notable enough to be linked to Wikipedia articles?
 * During this time, AMCP became involved in political affairs by joining the Coalition on Health Care Reform to address the national health reform debates of 1994, and by bringing several AMCP members to Capitol Hill for the first annual Lobby Day. this is meaningless to me, not linked to any articles, no explantion
 * Highlights of AMCP’s achievements between 1996 and 1998... Why are these highlights, no references or links to articles?
 * the Format became a de facto industry standard evidence?
 * Hasn't the society ever been criticised or got things wrong at all?