User talk:Neat glare

August 2020
Hello, I'm Fire star on heat. I noticed that you recently removed content from Characters in Mahabharata without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fire star on heat (talk) 06:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Characters in Mahabharata, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 11:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

I have joined today only into editing. I think u are misinterpreted Soulful Journey (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RadhaKrishn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naga. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

I didn't had done anything (edited) Soulful Journey (talk) 20:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Raziya's biography
I had read many sources few claiming about friendship between Razia and Altunia, few saying lovers and childhood sweetheart but can you please explain why are you mentioning it there Altunia just wanted prisoned Rasia for benifits and later when he lost any hope of benifits he freed her and married. There are many historians claiming about love angle but you have shown a greedy devil angel of Raziya's spouse Soulful Journey (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editorials
Re: these edits. RadhaKrishn exists right? And it is ofcourse the "First" season. Now, it is being rumoured that "Krishna Arjuna Gaatha" is the second season but how? Wouldn't "Krishna Arjuna Gaatha" then be "Radhakrishn 2"? Also there are no references proving that "Krishna Arjuna Gaatha" is mimicking "Radhakrishn 2." But still lets assume that "Krishna Arjuna Gaatha" be the "Second" season for the sake of continuing with the talk but as per your editorial, "Krishna Arjuna Gaatha/Radhakrishn 2" didn't even last for a year. How? And now makers try to introduce "Radhakrishn 3" which is sloppily edited. These edits are ridiculously confusing. And again there are no references proving that we have "The Season 3". This concludes that There is no Season 2 or Season 3. Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 17:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Rethere; It is being already concluded that there are no Season 2 or 3; which is the consequence of lack of evidences proving the same. You may continue with hype of other seasons Only if you have valid proof and if you don't have then don't repeat with your unproved opinion of other seasons because they may be considered disruptive if repeated again and again. Such editorials may lead your account to get banned.

Thanks Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 11:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Templates
Hi there, re: these changes, I'm not sure what you thought you were doing, but you added ubl templates where they weren't required. "UBL" is shorthand for "unbulleted list". We wouldn't use an unbulleted list if there were only one name listed. And, you also added blank templates, like as well as other formatting errors. You also left these problems behind so that someone else now has the burden of fixing them. Please double check your edits before saving them to the page, and if you don't understand something, ask someone, for example at the Help Desk. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)