User talk:Nebby1838

Apis mellifera rodopica
Hi. Twice now, you have deleted sourced content in the article for Apis mellifera macedonica without giving an explanation. If there are one or more recent publications (post-2010) in which rodopica is treated as a valid subspecies rather than a synonym of macedonica, you need to provide a reliably sourced citation for at least one such publication. If this is your own personal opinion, or unpublished research, it is a violation of Wikipedia policies to edit articles in a way that contradicts the existing published sources. Please, before you continue, read the Wikipedia policies at WP:RS and WP:NOR. Thanks. Dyanega (talk) 20:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, I will happily provide you with a study, but I need a few days and it will probably be in bulgarian language. I also have another question. Can you not merge my article on Bulgarian honey bee to Apis mellifera macedonica since I saw that somebody suggested merging to be done. If you can't help me who should I talk to?
 * Thank you in advance Nebby1838 (talk) 12:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Is there a peer-reviewed publication showing that macedonica and rodopica are not synonyms? A paper that simply treats rodopica as valid but does not offer evidence of differentation from macedonica is not sufficient; any such study would still be need to be listed in Wikipedia within the existing article for macedonica. Dyanega (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have the full study on a file (which some are locked on the interned,they need to be purchased) and some are free. Should i reference those links if I want to create a new article stating rodopica is a different subspecie Nebby1838 (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Since your previous edit said you are the student of the professor whose work you wish to cite, you have a conflict of interest on this topic. I'll post info below on what that means, but in a nutshell: you should not work directly on this topic, but only make edit requests on relevant talk pages. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The language I used in that merged article was very neutral. I am not promoting it, just want to spread the word for the misinformed. Nebby1838 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I just want to spread the word of the misinformed is a textbook statement of conflict of interest. It runs counter to our neutral point of view policy. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Tracking things down, it appears that the recognition of both rodopica and carpatica as valid subspecies can be traced to a 2020 literature review in the Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences; this is not a taxonomic revision, and does not formally elevate these subspecies out of synonymy - it simply lists them as valid, and cites directly contradictory rationales for recognizing them (e.g., citing Engel's 1999 revision as a source providing evidence for their recognition, when this is the work that formally synonymized them both, explicitly stating there was no evidence that they were valid). As such, while it is appropriate to acknowledge and cite the 2020 work, and I have done so on the "List of Subspecies" article, it is unclear that there is a consensus among bee taxonomists that the extra two subspecies should be considered raised out of synonymy. Listing them as disputed seems the most appropriate course at this point. Dyanega (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you check this out?
 * http://web.uni-plovdiv.bg/mollov/EB/2021_SE4/079-086_eb21SE408.pdf
 * Let me know what you think!
 * Thanks in advance Nebby1838 (talk) 23:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

The PDF you linked to does not specify the exact source of the population labeled as being from Greece - it just says "Greece". There are two described subspecies of A. mellifera in Greece - cecropia and macedonica. It is possible that the bees used in the study were cecropia, in which case they would be expected to be different. Only bees from northern Greece would be possible to confidently ID as macedonica, but the paper does not give this information. Dyanega (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * What about this one?
 * http://web.uni-plovdiv.bg/mollov/EB/2021_SE4/079-086_eb21SE408.pdf Nebby1838 (talk) 08:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * That's the same article you linked before. 138.23.68.28 (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * My bad!
 * https://www.proceedings.bas.bg/DOI/doi2020_b_09.html
 * Let me know if you can see the full study Nebby1838 (talk) 16:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 20 private alelles were detected in the DNA matter provided for the bees of the region of Bulgaria. Private alelles are unique to a particular endemic specie. Nebby1838 (talk) 11:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The data does not matter until it is used in secondary sources. That takes time. Be patient. Move on to working on other things that are ready to be updated instead of obsessing over something you have no control over at this time. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Bulgarian honey bee


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Bulgarian honey bee, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Nebby1838. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Your article Професор Пламен Петров
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Професор Пламен Петров to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Plamen Petrov (academic) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Plamen Petrov (academic). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and see the list of issues it is tagged with. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plamen Petrov (academic) (March 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plamen Petrov (academic) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Plamen_Petrov_(academic) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ARandomName123&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Plamen_Petrov_(academic) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)