User talk:Nebojsagajic11

Pravila
Pre svega, zdravo! Usled neverovatnih gluposti koje si napravio u prethodna dva dana, moram da ti skrenem pažnju na pojedine stvari. To što je neko potpisao za Zvezdu ili Partizan, ne znači da je on odmah toliko važan da dobije stranu. Da bi igrač ispunio kriterijume za dobijanje stranice, mora da ima nastup u profesionalnoj ligi, ili nastup za A selekciju nacionalnog tima. Kako Senić ne ispunjava ove uslove, uz to u članku ne postoje izvori, vrlo je verovatno da će biti izbrisan. Druga stvar, matični klubovi često povlače igrače koji su na pozajmicama tokom zimske pauze, ali to ne znači da su se oni vratili sa tih pozajmica. Svi ti igrači su zvanično na pozajmicama do kraja sezone i vraćaju se u klub tek po okončanju iste, sem ukoliko se pozajmica ne raskine, što će biti ubjavljeno u zvaničnim dokumentima fudbalskog saveza. Ovo ti napominjem zato što bi sve ovo već bilo ubačeno da je trebalo da bude. Isto, sve što se doda u bilo koji artikl, trebalo bi da bude pokriveno relevantnim izvorima. U suprotnom, moderatori imaju pravo da vrate svaku izmenu, a ako nema validnih izvora, mogu čak da traže i brisanje cele strane. Razmisli o tome, jer niko nije lud što sve to radi, već postoje neka pravila. Spisak profesionalnih liga možeš pronaći ovde: WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues, a ukoliko imaš nekih pitanja budi slobodan da se obratiš. Takođe, shvati ovo kao poslednje upozorenje, jer se vandalizmi sankcionišu banovanjem. Lotom (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Drago mi je da sa druge strane neko s kim je moguće komunicirati. Izvinjavam se što sam možda bio teži na rečima na prvu loptu, ali ovih dana je zaista puno spamera koji uglavnom ne prave korisne izmene, što ume strašno da iritira jer neko sve to treba da vraća. Vikipedija jeste slobodna enciklopedija koju generalno svako može da uređuje, ali je suština da te izmene budu konstuktivne i objektivne. Nije poenta u ovlašćenjima, već da su informacije koje čitalac dobije relevantne, čemu doprinosi i sama preglednost stranice. Zato je važno da sve izmene budu propraćene izvorima tj. referencama, jer se tako može proveriti da li je napisano u tekstu verodostojno situaciji u stvarnosti. Zato sam i napomenuo igrače na pozajmicama, jer svaki sporazum, kao i raskid istog, mora da bude propraćen dokumentacijom u fudbalskom savezu. Ulazni transferi klubova na teritoriji Srbije postaće zvanični tek 23. januara, kada počinje prelazni rok. U suštini ima nas nekoliko koji smo non-stop aktivni i trudimo se da propratimo sve ono najvažnije. Napomenuo bih još i to da se uglavnom treba pridržavati zvaničnih prezentacija klubova i dokumenata fudbalskog saveza, jer su oni najmerodavniji. Preporuka je da se žuta štampa izbegava, tj. da se koristi samo ukoliko je decidirano naglašen podatak bez uvijanja i licitiranja u smislu biće ili trebalo bi da se dogodi, a na kraju od svega ne ispadne ništa. I novinari, razume se, moraju da žive od nečega i zato po tom pitanju treba biti selektivan. Recimo, mali Mirkailo iz Jagodine o kome se pisalo već je nastupao za dva kluba i prema propisima ne bi imao pravo da igra do kraja sezone ukoliko bi sada potpisao za Zvezdu. Rezime svega bi bio da čak i ako je igrač potpisao ugovor sa klubom, isti postaje pravosnažan tek nakon overe u savezu, do tada je uglavnom sve više-manje mrtvo slovo na papiru.


 * Najbolji način(po meni) za kreiranje novih artikala ili dodavanje izvora je kopiranje već postojećih uz promenu parametara. Treba voditi računa i o sintaksi da se nešto ne bi "prelomilo". Ako se jedna referenca koristi više puta umesto stavlja se  i onda se prilikom svake nove upotrebe dodaje. Ovo ___ predstavlja sam naziv reference koji može biti proizvoljan. Važno je da se prilikom dodavanja igrača u transferima taj igrač doda i u dolazećem i u odlazaćem klubu. Ukoliko igrač koji je došao u istom prelaznom roku ubrzo napusti klub, nema potrebe dodavati ga u obe liste (in & out), već samo naglasiti tipa "previously..." Da bi se izbeglo gomilanje izmena u kratkom vremenskom periodu, poželjno je koristiti "Show preview" (pretpregled) čime se olakšava uočavanje grešaka i ispravljanje istih pre čuvanja izmena. Bio sam malo opširniji, ali se nadam da sam pomogao. Lotom (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * On the Milan Senić page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=760154125 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F760154125%7CMilan Senić%5D%5D Ask for help])

Proposed deletion of Mateus Viveiros


The article Mateus Viveiros has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 08:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Milan Senić


The article Milan Senić has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Milan Senić


The article Milan Senić has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Milan Senić for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milan Senić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Milan Senić until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mateus Viveiros


The article Mateus Viveiros has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)