User talk:NebulaEditor

2020 Pacific typhoon season
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you manually reverted my previous edit which changed "People's Republic of China" (a redirect to China) to "China". I did this because having the "People's Republic" part is already excessive since majority of the modern world simply refer to the PRC as "China". Since having it as simply "China" makes the article less confusing, and since it avoids having to pass through a redirect, I've returned the edit that you reverted. If you wish to contest my decision, please do so on the article talk page, since we have guidelines on triple reverts.

I also noticed that you haven't been placing edit summaries on your edits. Edit summaries are a great way to help us learn the context and intent of your edit, so please put them in as much as possible. Thanks!

And don't forget to sign the end of your edits on talk pages with ! Have a great day! Chlod (say hi!) 13:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello! I'm popping in again on your talk page since I reverted an edit that you made on the 2020 Pacific typhoon season (see here). PAGASA has not issued any warnings about the system yet, and has not even issued a weather advisory regarding the system. I've reverted your edits for now since they don't seem to have any basis, and you didn't even add a reliable source to back up your edit.

Again, I'd also like to reiterate that you should really put edit summaries on your edits, so we can learn more about your edit. And I'd also like you remind you to always put verifiable and reliable sources to back up your edits. Have a great day! Chlod (say hi!) 12:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I watched the PAGASA bulletin and they issued some updates on a system, and is planning to make an advisory on it in 11AM PST NebulaEditor (talk) 02:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)'


 * I see. I couldn't find anything on their weather advisory page nor was their an existing severe weather bulletin. If you could, please leave a link to where you got the information as a reference on that article. That would do a lot. Thanks for understanding, and have a nice day! Chlod (say hi!) 02:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * By the way, I had your talk page on my watchlist, so I was able to reply. However, as a courtesy for other users, you should always WP:NOTIFY editors whenever you reply. This tells the user that you replied to their message on your talk page.

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bavi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Chlod. Your recent edit(s) to the page 2020 Pacific typhoon season appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Chlod (say hi!) 09:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Forecasts on season articles
I've probably been taking too many trips to your talk page, but it seems like you haven't been reading the edit summaries, so I'll make it clear here. Unless an event is notable and bound to happen, future information should not be added to Wikipedia. Forecasts definitely fit in the zone of "futuer information". We're well aware that the PAGASA TCA says that Goni will enter the Philippine Area of Responsibility, however this isn't a notable event as it's just a tropical cyclone entering a certain area. The reason why this is added in the season articles is because it already happened, which means we're no longer predicting the future, but simply citing an event that had occurred. Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and that although article content dealing with past and current events are allowed, events in the future are usually left out.

And please, add citations. "The JTWC said" or "PAGASA said" is not a valid citation. We need actual verifiable references if you don't want your content to get removed. Chlod (say hi!) 03:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Category 3.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Haishen is still the strongest at this point...
... as it still has a lower pressure than Goni. So stop reverting my edits and starting an edit war. Kind regards, Typhoon2013  (talk) 09:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Help us help you help us all.
, please refrain from restoring reverted content which has reasons behind the revert. Aside from that, you haven't been adding any sources to your edits, adding edit summaries, nor been making attempts to communicate with other editors, as evident by your talk page, which only has a single reply from you. Please remember that competence is required on Wikipedia, and that we don't want to clean up articles as much as you don't want your edits reverted (I hope.) In case you still need help, please take a stroll through Help:Getting started and read up on policies and editing guidelines. Personally, I suggest you also read Verifiability, Citing sources, Reliable sources, Help:Edit summary and Talk page guidelines. As for the "edit war" that Typhoon2013 mentioned above, I suggest checking Edit warring to learn more about that. Messages like these might be a bit intimidating, but we'll all be happy to help you learn more about Wikipedia, and you shouldn't feel shy or afraid about talking with us. Please help us help you help us all. Chlod (say hi!) 10:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Inviting you to the WikiProject Tropical cyclones!
 SMB9 9thx   my edits  00:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please preview your edits before saving instead of breaking the template. Help:Preview should give you more information on that. Repeatedly breaking a template may be considered vandalism. If you don't know what you're doing, ask for help or read the template documentation instead of taking shotgun guesses that don't do anything but clutter the page history and break the template's display. Chlod (say hi!) 13:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2020 Pacific typhoon season into Draft:2021 Pacific typhoon season. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Tropical Storm Choi-wan (2021). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. ''This was solved by CSD via A10 on the mainspace article you created and moving the draft to mainspace. Please refrain from copying drafts to mainspace while the draft is being actively developed. This is your second warning, so please refrain from making these kinds of moves again.''  Sennecaster   ( What now? ) 01:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Beraniladri19. An edit that you recently made to 2021 Atlantic hurricane season seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. NHC haven't issued its final advisory. Bera  niladri19  🌀🌀 07:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Unreferenced edits
Hello, I've noticed some of your recent edits have been unreferenced, e.g. adding content without citing a source. This is not a warning, but rather a piece of advice. I'd recommend you read Help:Referencing for beginners and Citing sources for further reading, because when we add content, we need to ensure everything is verifiable and is supported by reliable sources. I've added sources to some of your edits, but please note that if material is still kept unsourced after a while, it can be removed without notice to keep the article verifiable. Additionally, I'd recommend you read some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially the principles, content policies, and content guidelines to further familiarize you with Wikipedia. Thanks!  Akber mamps  04:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Coming here to reiterate this, you're going to need to cite a reliable source for things like this to show that it isn't your own analyses that you're adding. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 15:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Ditto here, which does include a source, but only backs up a small portion (with the rest being original research, I assume). "Errors" in forecasting is a bit of an oxymoron. Forecasts are predictions. They are not always 100% correct. Chlod (say hi!) 16:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , The user used facebook as a source which is according to WP:RSP is GENERALLY unreliable Bera  niladri19  🌀🌀 08:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The link points to a post by the official Facebook page of ABS-CBN News. In this scenario, we rely on the reliability of ABS-CBN rather than Facebook as a whole. It's marked as "generally unreliable" for a reason &mdash; breaking news and other information are sometimes posted on social media by reliable sources (mostly due to its wider reach), of which the reliability depends on the creator of the post, not the platform. This is why some advisories are cited from the Twitter accounts of weather agencies: because additional context useful in an article is not provided on their official website, and is instead provided through social media. Chlod (say hi!) 08:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.    HurricaneEdgar    07:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, there tropical depression 'Five', did not upgraded to tropical storm 'Elsa' per NHC pls provide reliable sources thanks you.  HurricaneEdgar    07:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Pls refrain using unsourced info, NHC haven't yet upgraded to TS Elsa. If you don't cite source then it will be violation of WP:OR and you may be blocked by admin. Bera  niladri19  🌀🌀 07:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

I saw ATCF upgrade it to Elsa — Preceding unsigned comment added by NebulaEditor (talk • contribs) 07:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi we dont use ATCF for updating we should wait The NHC issued thank you  HurricaneEdgar    07:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , ATCF is not official, NHC is official, use NHC data not ATCF. Also sign your comments by given this ~ Bera  niladri19  🌀🌀 07:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

sorry for the drama. i won't do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NebulaEditor (talk • contribs) 13:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Beraniladri19. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2021 Pacific typhoon season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Please provide a reliable source to prove your claim  Bera  niladri19  🌀🌀 03:22, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2021 Pacific typhoon season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. '' Please provide a reliable source. Your edits are considered original research'' Bera  niladri19  🌀🌀 07:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Continual unreferenced edits
Please do not continue to add unreferenced edits to articles. You have received multiple reminders over the past few months, yet you still continue to do the same things. Multiple editors have had to cite your additions by themselves or outright remove them because you did not cite reliable sources. Continual additions of unreferenced content and failure to listen to advice given by other editors can count as disruptive editing, and if it gets severe enough, it may be grounds for a temporary block. Please read pages like Help:Referencing for beginners, Citing sources, Reliable sources, and No original research to help guide you to citing sources properly.  Akber mamps  01:41, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

pls add your Reliable sources, when you add the information in the article thank you. HurricaneEdgar   03:36, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia.     HurricaneEdgar    08:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Proper citation
Hi, thank you for updating the page. Just a remainder pls use the following template while citing the specific topic :-


 * For JTWC

For the  parameter, insert either   or   or   depending on the link you are using. Note that -->


 * tcfa for citing TCFA issued by JTWC
 * warn for citing text warnings issued by JTWC
 * prog for citing Prognostic Reasoning issued by JTWC

Example :-

gives

For further info please see ---> Template:Cite JTWC

P.S :- Archives of JTWC can be found here (text warnings) and here (prognostic reasoning)


 * For PAGASA

For the  parameter, insert either   or   or   depending on the link you are using. Note that -->


 * tcb for citing Tropical Cyclone Bulletin issued by PAGASA
 * swb for citing Severe Weather Bulletin issued by PAGASA
 * tca for citing Tropical Cyclone Advisory issued by PAGASA

Example :-

gives

For further info please see ---> Template:Cite PAGASA

P.S :- Archives of PAGASA can be found here


 * For Twitter

For the  parameter, insert the number which is present at the end of the url, for eg :- if the url is this https://twitter.com/dost_pagasa/status/1435398704890933249 then insert 1435398704890933249 to the   parameter.

Example :-

gives

For further info please see ---> Template:Cite tweet

I know it's complicated but after few weeks you'll get it. Just use source editor instead of visual editor for adding citation and just copy paste it and fill the details. And also, always use long dates in MM/DD/YY format, for eg:- August 15, 1947. Thank you and happy editing :-)

Bera niladri19  🌀🌀 10:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Pacific.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2021 Pacific typhoon season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.   Chlod (say hi!) 00:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. HurricaneEdgar   14:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Pressure (Malakas)
Hi, i noticed that you are add unsourced version. pls note that we are use RSMC JMA for pressure. HurricaneEdgar   10:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nock-ten landfall.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nock-ten landfall.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 09:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Please delete the file. It was a wrong upload, actually and it wasn't the file I was meant to upload. I apologize for the inconvenience. NebulaEditor (talk) 09:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

It was a wrong upload apparently. Please delete the content.

Continuous addition of unsourced content
NebulaEditor, you've continuously added content onto pages without proper citations. Your recent edit to the 2022 Pacific typhoon season shows only a minimal dedication with regards to citing sources, even despite the notices and messages you've received from editors. With edits like these, Wikipedia loses its ability to keep its content verifiable and often leads to bad article quality, no matter the quality of the text written. Cite your sources or risk having your edits reverted. Chlod (say hi!) 10:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)