User talk:Necamonecamor/sandbox

Peer Review: Arch of Claudius (British victory)
-

--Ammit88 (talk) 20:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review: Porticus Aemilia
Lead paragraph: Good, succinctly describing the structure and its usage.

Images: The map is helpful. Good to be clear that we're not 100% sure about the photo and if it shows this porticus.

History and description: Perhaps split into a couple different sections as you add information? (eg. Building and description; usage and significance, or whatever makes sense).

Why was it rebuilt only 20 years after its completion? Unclear.

Of course add citations (and change in-text citations to footnotes) in the body paragraphs here, such as for info about the usage (2nd paragraph) and building process (3rd P. especially about the experimental building techniques). It looks like you have sources in your sandbox that will cover this info well.

Is there enough information to add a section about excavations in the area? Maybe that would help clarify a) the controversies about its remains and b) what research work has actually been done on the structure.

No need to link "river" in the 3rd paragraph—Tiber is already linked in the lead paragraph and I think that's enough.

External links: Ricerche in corso sui magazzini romani - Study meeting of 13–15 April 2011, Rome, National Roman Museum (in Italian only). appears to be broken.

SelinaLee (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)