User talk:Neckbrace

N o f o rmation Talk  03:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC) N o f o rmation Talk  03:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

My talk

Warning
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hipocrite (talk) 03:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit warring
Please stop adding the same information after it has been reverted by myself and other users. I have started a discussion on the talk page about the edit and consensus seems firmly against it so far. WP is a collaborative effort and your attempts to force your edits will not work. It will simply end with you being blocked and unable to edit the article. Start using the Talk Page, that's what WP is all about.

Secondly, because this article is controversial, you should be discussing changes to the article before you make them if they are possibly contentious, as many of your edits have been. N o f o rmation Talk  04:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.


 * Please stop your edit war. When there is a disagreement between editors on Wikipedia, you should go to the article's talk page and discuss the matter. Just continuing to revert will get you blocked. Dayewalker (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 Hours for Edit Warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 05:20, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Astrology, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Yobol (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Hipocrite with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Trusilver 18:43, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Notvand
Please review WP:NOTVAND. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for immediately resuming edit-warring after the expiration of your previous block, combined with false accusations of vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell Talk 18:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neckbrace6547 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)