User talk:Neckhumbucker

The article Radio insect records has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ozan Boz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ozan Boz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ozan Boz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 21:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ozan Boz


A tag has been placed on Ozan Boz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Ozan Boz. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... disco spinster   talk  17:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:C9AC:A0C:6F13:582C (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Neckhumbucker. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:C9AC:A0C:6F13:582C (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Reply: 2601:188:180:B8E0:C9AC:A0C:6F13:582C
 * After reading your comments on the article’s edit history and deletion discussion, I am quite sure you won’t believe me but I just saw this message. Message about COI in my inbox doesn’t take me here. Maybe it’s a bug, I don’t know. After COI was placed on the article, I kept looking at the talk page for the article for a discussion. And in the deletion discussion of the article I asked for more details as COI is very broad. I also reached out to a couple of editors for help on how to respond to COI, but no response so far. So much for the community spirit. Anyways…
 * I've read conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide [] among others. Guidelines assume once COI is placed the editor must have a COI, and guide the editor for what not to do. It is quite bizarre. I couldn't find anything on responding to a COI claim that the editor doesn’t accept.
 * I just discovered the TeaHouse. So I’ll also ask for help there.
 * In the meantime, for what it’s worth, I will leave a statement here and hope that it will help: I am not in any way affiliated with the persons in my articles, nor did I receive any remuneration for writing the articles.
 * Anyone who feels the need to respond to this message, I kindly ask you to keep good faith.
 * Neckhumbucker (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ozan Boz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ozan Boz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ozan Boz& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  23:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Re your undeletion request
Hello, I have asked for the draft I created to be deleted, per your request. If you have any other questions/concerns, please let me know. Cheers 13:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
This is very disappointing. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)