User talk:Nedeljka McKinley

December 2021
Hello, I'm 65.92.246.142. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Stop giving out spurious warnings. Clearly there are multiple houses of Liao in the history of the world, If you disagree, you can simply revert. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  15:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

A little sensitive?
How is following the style guidelines by "Prohibition" (not everyone in the world is an American, or knowledgeable in American history), correcting a hyphen where an ndash should be, or italicizing the name of a newspaper "vandalizing"? (Hint: it's not). Save your zeal for those with obscenity, racial slurs, and political axes to grind, not someone making innocuous (but useful) changes which keep compliance to an encyclopedic style. 2600:1004:B12B:31ED:0:4A:3B38:3001 (talk) 15:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Blocked
I'm not clear whether you're using a malfunctioning bot or if you're intentionally being disruptive, but I've blocked this account until it's clarified what's going on here as even if you're operating in complete good faith, it's not reasonable to expect other editors to continue to clean up after you indefinitely. Any administrator has my explicit permission to reverse this block without consulting/notifying me if you can convince them you're here to contribute in good faith. (To appeal, follow the instructions at Appealing a block or put Unblock on this page with the explanation of why you should be unblocked.) &#8209; Iridescent 15:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)