User talk:Nedhartley

Speedy deletion nomination of Infection theory
Hello Nedhartley,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Infection theory for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jyoti (talk) 13:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Vincent's "Starry Night"
Excellent expansion by you at The Starry Night! I don't edit Wikipedia any more (too much hassle), but I'll be working at Commons on Vincent's Saint-Rémy period the next few weeks (Starry Night originally categorised as at Arles ... ). Good luck with your Wikipedia edits. Jennie Matthews 97 (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Knox


A tag has been placed on Jeff Knox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SL93 (talk) 02:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Country Club of Charleston
I have moved your article to draft space, where you can work on bringing it up to the standard required. Deb (talk) 14:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I don't have a vested interest in this article or the subject of this article. I am not a member of the club. However, it seems to me that the Country Club of Charleston is a notable entity, if that is your objection. The club will host the 2019 U.S. Women's Open golf tournament, a major event coordinated by the United States Golf Association, and the course was designed by a noted golf course architect. It seems proper that any articles associated with the Women's Open should include a working link to a page for the site of the championship, as is the case with most other sites where the championship has been played. If your objection is to the format of the article, it seems to me that the point of Wikipedia is for the article to be edited by the community and that relegating it to draft status without stating precisely what is wrong with the article is counterproductive. Nedhartley (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. If you want to attract someone else's attention to an edit, you can either ping them or place the comment on their talk page. I've only just seen this, and purely by chance. Have a look at Verifiability. Of the three sources you cited, two were from the website of the Country Club itself, and the other was an invitation to buy tickets for the tournament. You need to find independent sources to demonstrate notability. Deb (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Country Club of Charleston


Hello, Nedhartley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Country Club of Charleston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Faith Ringgold
In your page on Faith I would note that her husband Burdette Ringgold died February 1, 2019. i am her daughter Michele Wallace. 2603:7000:BA00:CC6E:E057:52:4BE1:6C75 (talk) 19:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Being the Ricardos
I have undone your deletion of the major historical error in Being the Ricardos, because the issue here is that the Cuban Revolution of 1933 was not a Communist Revolution -- that was the Cuban Revolution of 1959 against Batista. Thus when the LA Times is used as a citation to source Arnaz (only) saying that his family had escaped Cuba because of the Communists (which he states in the film) that implies a Cuban Revolution which took place in 1959 - not 1933! Thus your logic that "in any case it was the Revolution of 1933" misses the film's erroneous association to Communism as of why Arnaz's family had to leave Cuba in 1933 (the revolution led by Batista) NOT the Communist Revolution led by Castro. Your comment on an unreliable source for that part is also a little quizzical, as that source just presents a clean timeline for the issue - but no one debates that the Cuban Revolution of 1933 - the year that the Arnaz family came to the US, and the Cuban Revolution of 1959 took place 26 years apart! Therefore: (1) Arnaz family came to US in 1933 because of Cuban Revolution of 1933 led by Batista (Wikipedia sources that) (2) Arnaz says in film that his family left Cuba because of the Communists (LA Times is one source for that) (3) Therefore, that statement (and thus a major point in the movie) is incorrect, since the Communist takeover was not until 1959 (Wikipedia sources that and every history book on the planet) and clearly merits inclusion in the article.

Thank you.--ThatLaurelGirl (talk) 15:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)