User talk:Needtaknow12

January 2013
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Worship Music (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Worship Music (album), without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The issue is very simple. You are removing a reference, which is not permitted. You are also adding unreferenced material which has been proven incorrect. if you continue, you will most likely be blocked from editing. I suggest that you find sources to support your claim that Dan Nelson had writing credits and add them without removing the AllMusic reference. Thanks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * When this copyright issue has been resolved and the new rights are published, add that to the article. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * This "good man's musical resume" is already damaged being denied so we're not damaging denying it any more. Wikipedia needs a reliable source to add anything. We already have one in the AllMusic reference. If you can give us a reliable source to indicate that there's a copyright battle going on, then we can add that, but not that Mr. Nelson is the writer since that's part of this supposed ongoing court battle.
 * Also, respond here, not my talk page. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Why may I ask do you figure his resume is damaged? And sir with all due respect, the court disputes were settled in Nelsons favor on June 25th, 2012 New York. Thanks again, and be well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needtaknow12  (talk • contribs)  17:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Because he had to go to court to get his name on the tracks. Again, where are documents to support this court case? The article should be updated to include Mr. Nelson as the author of those tracks and it should include the legal battle. Without sources, the policies are clear: it stays out.
 * Also, please sign your comments on talk pages. Keeping them indented helps as well. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

This is no way reflects someone's reputation being "damaged". If so, then more then half of the worlds recording artists who have been in court disputes or copyright battles are such. Good day sir.
 * Understood. I have corrected my terms.
 * Find a reliable source for your claims and you'll be fine. I'll even help you add it correctly to the article. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Walter, your offer to help is greatly appreciated. Have a great day and enjoy the rest of your week.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Worship Music (album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''And yet you continue to break Wikipedia policy. If you would like me or an admin to explain them to you, please ask, but stop 1) deleting the source that's there and 2) stop adding unreferenced material.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)