User talk:Neelendra1715

Your contributions to article cross
They were linguistically quite dubious -- and perhaps even more importantly for Wikipedia, no source was given. AnonMoos (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

=Cross again= Dude, it would be nice if you could discuss things (either here on Talk:Cross) instead of making radical edits which seem to be quite problematic in several respects. The main obstacle is that if you go to standard reputable scholarly etymological dictionaries of English, nothing about Sanskrit is mentioned at all. Furthermore, the stem in ancient Latin was KRUK-, so it's quite difficult to see how a Sanksrit form KRAS- could be relevant (and it's also quite difficult to imagine a historically plausible cultural and linguistic transmission path between areas where Sanskrit was the liturgical language and Rome ca. 200 B.C.). AnonMoos (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)