User talk:Neelix/deletions/Archive 1

Girl-crazily listed at Redirects for discussion Result dozens deleted
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Girl-crazily and dozens of similar redirects. Since you had some involvement with the Girl-crazily redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ignite the Road to Justice for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ignite the Road to Justice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ignite the Road to Justice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Breaking Free (organization) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Breaking Free (organization) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Breaking Free (organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Freedom Week for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom Week is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Freedom Week& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

NSYC listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NSYC. Since you had some involvement with the NSYC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Good order


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Good order requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 09:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nudity of the thorax


A tag has been placed on Nudity of the thorax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 08:27, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Naked pelvis listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Naked pelvis. Since you had some involvement with the Naked pelvis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Nude pelvis listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nude pelvis. Since you had some involvement with the Nude pelvis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Fragmentingness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fragmentingness. Since you had some involvement with the Fragmentingness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Fragmentationally listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fragmentationally. Since you had some involvement with the Fragmentationally redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Fragmentalizing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fragmentalizing. Since you had some involvement with the Fragmentalizing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Feminisationally listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feminisationally. Since you had some involvement with the Feminisationally redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

White supremacistical listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White supremacistical. Since you had some involvement with the White supremacistical redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Pimp stick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pimp stick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pimp stick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 05:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Popularistically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Popularistically. Since you had some involvement with the Popularistically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Judgmentalistically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Judgmentalistically. Since you had some involvement with the Judgmentalistically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Dehumanisational listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dehumanisational. Since you had some involvement with the Dehumanisational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Social-economistic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Social-economistic. Since you had some involvement with the Social-economistic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Para-militaristically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Para-militaristically. Since you had some involvement with the Para-militaristically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Noncatholicism listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Noncatholicism. Since you had some involvement with the Noncatholicism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Despectacularizations listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Despectacularizations. Since you had some involvement with the Despectacularizations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Biblicistically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Biblicistically. Since you had some involvement with the Biblicistically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Socio-economistic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socio-economistic. Since you had some involvement with the Socio-economistic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Twin Ponds for deletion Result was Merge 14 Neelix articles into new article Salvation Army camps in Canada
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twin Ponds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Twin Ponds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 23:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shallaway


A tag has been placed on Shallaway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Si Trew (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Oi Kwan listed at Redirects for discussion Result was delete and move another unrelated article over top.
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oi Kwan. Since you had some involvement with the Oi Kwan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kelly hi! 04:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Alysa van Haastert for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alysa van Haastert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alysa van Haastert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

The History listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The History. Since you had some involvement with the The History redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Inflammationally listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inflammationally. Since you had some involvement with the Inflammationally redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 13:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Tackinesses listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tackinesses. Since you had some involvement with the Tackinesses redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Redirects for deletion
all created within 5 minutes on 1 September 2015 by Neelix. None are useful redirects to Parable_of_the_Prodigal_Son

The Love-Sick Father Love-Sick Father The Parable of the Love-Sick Father Parable of the Love-Sick Father The Lovesick Father Lovesick Father The Parable of the Lovesick Father Parable of the Lovesick Father The Loving Father Loving Father = seriously? The Parable of the Loving Father Parable of the Loving Father The Running Father Running Father The Parable of the Running Father Parable of the Running Father The Parable of the Lost Son Parable of the Lost Son Two Sons The Parable of the Two Sons

If any of these are actually useful, someone will recreate them as required. Legacypac (talk) 01:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shrinker


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shrinker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Good order listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Good order. Since you had some involvement with the Good order redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 12:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Coridon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coridon. Since you had some involvement with the Coridon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Re-energisations listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Re-energisations. Since you had some involvement with the Re-energisations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

The place of gathering listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The place of gathering. Since you had some involvement with the The place of gathering redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Retargeted so resolved. Legacypac (talk) 12:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

One who brings food listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect One who brings food. Since you had some involvement with the One who brings food redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One who brings food


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on One who brings food requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 09:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

South Shore Lake Tahoe listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Shore Lake Tahoe. Since you had some involvement with the South Shore Lake Tahoe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Result: Withdrawn by Nom Legacypac (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Self-abnegates listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self-abnegates. Since you had some involvement with the Self-abnegates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Three axis listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Three axis and dozens of similar ones as a block. Since you created the Three axis redirect and all the similar ones, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Terryturner.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Terryturner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legacypac (talk • contribs)

Other ships of BC Ferries (not classed) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other ships of BC Ferries (not classed). Since you had some involvement with the Other ships of BC Ferries (not classed) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sessility (medicine)


The article Sessility (medicine) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 08:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Francoise Gay listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Francoise Gay. Since you had some involvement with the Francoise Gay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 04:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Individualism.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Individualism.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Redirects to Polycephaly
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Four headed and 173 others as a group. Since you created the Four headed redirect and all the similar ones, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Redirects on this list 26898 to 27071 [ and [] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legacypac (talk • contribs) 06:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Claudia Pulchra Major
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Claudia Pulchra Major, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/Claudia_Pulchra.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:46, 8 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legacypac (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of Kovak


The article Kovak has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability as a band. Supposedly "the next big thing" of a few years ago, but has anything happened since?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rotary Centre for the Arts


A tag has been placed on Rotary Centre for the Arts, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.gobc.ca/okanagan-valley-travel/rotary-centre-for-the-arts-shelly-vida_2890. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Figurelessness


A tag has been placed on Figurelessness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

word made up by user, or extremely rare word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 01:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Non-figurativism


A tag has been placed on Non-figurativism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

fake word coined by the user

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 01:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Non-figuration


A tag has been placed on Non-figuration requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 01:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Non figuration


A tag has been placed on Non figuration requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

invented word, or maybe french

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 01:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Non-figurations


A tag has been placed on Non-figurations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

invented word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nonfiguration


A tag has been placed on Nonfiguration requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

invented word, or maybe french

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 01:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Non figurations


A tag has been placed on Non figurations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

user invented non word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 01:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nonfigurations


A tag has been placed on Nonfigurations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

invented word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Salvation Army camps in Canada
Template:Salvation Army camps in Canada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Legacypac (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Moralitas


A tag has been placed on Moralitas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

latin

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 06:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timelimiter


A tag has been placed on Timelimiter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

made up word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Time-limiter


A tag has been placed on Time-limiter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

made up word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Time-limiters


A tag has been placed on Time-limiters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

fake word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timelimiters


A tag has been placed on Timelimiters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

fake word

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timelimitation


A tag has been placed on Timelimitation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

editor just making up terms

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Time-limitation


A tag has been placed on Time-limitation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

dash is not needed.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timelimitations


A tag has been placed on Timelimitations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

should be two words. and that redirect exists

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Time-limitations


A tag has been placed on Time-limitations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no need for dash, and that redirect exists already

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sobbingness


A tag has been placed on Sobbingness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 22:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blubberingness


A tag has been placed on Blubberingness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 22:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mono-ethnicists


A tag has been placed on Mono-ethnicists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mono-ethnicist


A tag has been placed on Mono-ethnicist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Monoethnicist


A tag has been placed on Monoethnicist, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 12:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Scripts At Work for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scripts At Work is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scripts At Work until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Walk (play) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Walk (play) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Walk (play) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Hockey Dad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hockey Dad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hockey Dad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Evelyn Chew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evelyn Chew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Evelyn Chew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Carl Kennedy for deletion Result was Delete. Redirect then created to Karl Kennedy
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Kennedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carl Kennedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sienna Howell-Holden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sienna Howell-Holden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sienna Howell-Holden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Denise Wong for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denise Wong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Denise Wong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Glenda Warkentin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glenda Warkentin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Glenda Warkentin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Krogman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Krogman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aaron Krogman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lepa Jankovic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lepa Jankovic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lepa Jankovic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Katarina MacLeod for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katarina MacLeod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Katarina MacLeod until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 21:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bridget Perrier for deletion (result was keep)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridget Perrier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bridget Perrier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 21:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Pantlessness for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pantlessness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pantlessness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 19:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adventurerace


A tag has been placed on Adventurerace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 03:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Expeditionrace


A tag has been placed on Expeditionrace, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Expeditionraces


A tag has been placed on Expeditionraces, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Expedition-raced


A tag has been placed on Expedition-raced, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adventure-racers


A tag has been placed on Adventure-racers, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adventureracers


A tag has been placed on Adventureracers, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Expedition-races


A tag has been placed on Expedition-races, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Expedition Race Result was Redirect


A tag has been placed on The Expedition Race, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Retargeted was result. Legacypac (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Vednita Carter for deletion Result was Keep
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vednita Carter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vednita Carter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mélanie Paquin for deletion Result was Keep
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mélanie Paquin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mélanie Paquin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 13:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC) Result was keep Legacypac (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bukola Oriola for deletion Result was Keep
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bukola Oriola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bukola Oriola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 13:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC) Result was keep. Legacypac (talk) 21:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Chimney breast for deletion Result was Keep
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chimney breast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chimney breast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 23:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Timea Nagy (activist) for deletion Result was keep
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timea Nagy (activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Timea Nagy (activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 06:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of White Dog Cafe Result was Decline, sent to AfD


A tag has been placed on White Dog Cafe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of London Anti-Human Trafficking Committee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Anti-Human Trafficking Committee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/London Anti-Human Trafficking Committee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 21:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Servants Anonymous Society for deletion Result was keep
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Servants Anonymous Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Servants Anonymous Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 21:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC) Result was keep Legacypac (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sex Trade 101 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sex Trade 101 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sex Trade 101 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 19:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of A Better World for deletion result was keep and improve
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Better World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/A Better World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Morris Ertman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morris Ertman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Morris Ertman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jassy Bindra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jassy Bindra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jassy Bindra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tania Fiolleau for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tania Fiolleau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tania Fiolleau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Centre to End All Sexual Exploitation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centre to End All Sexual Exploitation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Centre to End All Sexual Exploitation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Glendene Grant for deletion - result was merge
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glendene Grant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Glendene Grant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 13:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Iris Thomsen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iris Thomsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Iris Thomsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 13:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Don Brewster for deletion (redirected)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Brewster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Don Brewster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 13:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Deborah's Gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deborah's Gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deborah's Gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:34, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of EVE (organization) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EVE (organization) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EVE (organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of To Emerge


A tag has been placed on To Emerge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 10:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Women of Distinction Awards for deletion It was keep, but merged
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Women of Distinction Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Women of Distinction Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 22:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gentlemanfarmer


A tag has been placed on Gentlemanfarmer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pieingness


A tag has been placed on Pieingness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pieingly


A tag has been placed on Pieingly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)