User talk:Neelix/deletions/Archive 2

The Enemy Within: The McClellan Committee's Crusade Against Jimmy Hoffa and Corrupt Labor Unions listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Enemy Within: The McClellan Committee&. Since you had some involvement with the The Enemy Within: The McClellan Committee's Crusade Against Jimmy Hoffa and Corrupt Labor Unions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Three-Handed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Three-Handed. Since you had some involvement with the Three-Handed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Separate residences listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Separate residences. Since you had some involvement with the Separate residences redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Separate housings listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Separate housings. Since you had some involvement with the Separate housings redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Separate residence listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Separate residence. Since you had some involvement with the Separate residence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Separate homes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Separate homes. Since you had some involvement with the Separate homes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Separate housing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Separate housing. Since you had some involvement with the Separate housing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Kolompar family listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kolompar family. Since you had some involvement with the Kolompar family redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Domotor family listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Domotor family. Since you had some involvement with the Domotor family redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Separate home listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Separate home. Since you had some involvement with the Separate home redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The deck of cards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The deck of cards. Since you had some involvement with the The deck of cards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Socialistimperialistic


A tag has been placed on Socialistimperialistic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Socialistimperialism


A tag has been placed on Socialistimperialism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 14:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Socialistimperialisms


A tag has been placed on Socialistimperialisms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 14:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Socialisticimperialism


A tag has been placed on Socialisticimperialism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 14:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Socialisticimperialist


A tag has been placed on Socialisticimperialist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 14:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Muff (genitals) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Muff (genitals). Since you had some involvement with the Muff (genitals) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Muff (hair) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Muff (hair). Since you had some involvement with the Muff (hair) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketing. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketers. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketeer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketeer. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketeer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketed. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketer. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketeers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketeers. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketeers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Grey economic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grey economic. Since you had some involvement with the Grey economic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketeered listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketeered. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketeered redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dark marketeering listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark marketeering. Since you had some involvement with the Dark marketeering redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Gray economic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gray economic. Since you had some involvement with the Gray economic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Gray economical listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gray economical. Since you had some involvement with the Gray economical redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Gray economically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gray economically. Since you had some involvement with the Gray economically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Grey economically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grey economically. Since you had some involvement with the Grey economically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Gray economist listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gray economist. Since you had some involvement with the Gray economist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Grey economist listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grey economist. Since you had some involvement with the Grey economist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Print-making in Japan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Print-making in Japan. Since you had some involvement with the Print-making in Japan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Printmaking in Japan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Printmaking in Japan. Since you had some involvement with the Printmaking in Japan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Print making in Japan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Print making in Japan. Since you had some involvement with the Print making in Japan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese print makers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese print makers. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese print makers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese print-makers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese print-makers. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese print-makers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese printmakers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese printmakers. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese printmakers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese print-maker listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese print-maker. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese print-maker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese print maker listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese print maker. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese print maker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese print-making listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese print-making. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese print-making redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese printmaker listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese printmaker. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese printmaker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Gray economists listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gray economists. Since you had some involvement with the Gray economists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese print making listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese print making. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese print making redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese print listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese print. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese print redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Grey economical listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grey economical. Since you had some involvement with the Grey economical redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Grey economists listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grey economists. Since you had some involvement with the Grey economists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The playing card listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The playing card. Since you had some involvement with the The playing card redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The five of hearts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The five of hearts. Since you had some involvement with the The five of hearts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The four of hearts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The four of hearts. Since you had some involvement with the The four of hearts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The ten of spades listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The ten of spades. Since you had some involvement with the The ten of spades redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Chrystallomancies listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chrystallomancies. Since you had some involvement with the Chrystallomancies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Max Ed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Max Ed. Since you had some involvement with the Max Ed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Offensive Fouls for deletion (Result - Keep with expansion)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Offensive Fouls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Offensive Fouls until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Choi


The article John Choi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * local minor political figure. Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 08:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Joseph-Francois-Louis-Charles listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joseph-Francois-Louis-Charles. Since you had some involvement with the Joseph-Francois-Louis-Charles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Human study listed at Redirects for discussion (Result was Retarget)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Human study. Since you had some involvement with the Human study redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Single wall listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single wall. Since you had some involvement with the Single wall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hunks listed at Redirects for discussion (retargeted to Hunk)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hunks. Since you had some involvement with the Hunks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Dishearteningness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dishearteningness. Since you had some involvement with the Dishearteningness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Disheartenedness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Disheartenedness. Since you had some involvement with the Disheartenedness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Disheartenedly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Disheartenedly. Since you had some involvement with the Disheartenedly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Desperativeness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Desperativeness. Since you had some involvement with the Desperativeness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blueishgreys listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blueishgreys. Since you had some involvement with the Blueishgreys redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Grayishblues listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grayishblues. Since you had some involvement with the Grayishblues redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blueishgrays listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blueishgrays. Since you had some involvement with the Blueishgrays redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Orangishblacks listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangishblacks. Since you had some involvement with the Orangishblacks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Orangeishblacks listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangeishblacks. Since you had some involvement with the Orangeishblacks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blackishoranges listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackishoranges. Since you had some involvement with the Blackishoranges redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Orangishblack listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangishblack. Since you had some involvement with the Orangishblack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blackishorange listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackishorange. Since you had some involvement with the Blackishorange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Tripleheader listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tripleheader. Since you had some involvement with the Tripleheader redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Triple-header listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Triple-header. Since you had some involvement with the Triple-header redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Pashes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pashes. Since you had some involvement with the Pashes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Triple headers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Triple headers. Since you had some involvement with the Triple headers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Pashing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pashing. Since you had some involvement with the Pashing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Tongue wrestlings listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tongue wrestlings. Since you had some involvement with the Tongue wrestlings redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Tongue wrestlers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tongue wrestlers. Since you had some involvement with the Tongue wrestlers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Pash (kiss) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pash (kiss). Since you had some involvement with the Pash (kiss) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blackishblues listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackishblues. Since you had some involvement with the Blackishblues redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blackishblue listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackishblue. Since you had some involvement with the Blackishblue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blueishblacks listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blueishblacks. Since you had some involvement with the Blueishblacks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Over producedly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Over producedly. Since you had some involvement with the Over producedly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Overproducedly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Overproducedly. Since you had some involvement with the Overproducedly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Over-producedly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Over-producedly. Since you had some involvement with the Over-producedly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Ouvrîmes listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ouvrîmes. Since you had some involvement with the Ouvrîmes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 04:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC) −

Weeteat listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Weeteat. Since you had some involvement with the Weeteat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC) −

Weed ate listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Weed ate. Since you had some involvement with the Weed ate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC) −

Grew glacier ice listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grew glacier ice. Since you had some involvement with the Grew glacier ice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC) −

Ice buildup listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ice buildup. Since you had some involvement with the Ice buildup redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC) −

Singleoperator listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singleoperator. Since you had some involvement with the Singleoperator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Single operator listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single operator. Since you had some involvement with the Single operator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Appearance of land listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Appearance of land. Since you had some involvement with the Appearance of land redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Apparitions of land listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Apparitions of land. Since you had some involvement with the Apparitions of land redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

René Augustin de Maupeou listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect René Augustin de Maupeou. Since you had some involvement with the René Augustin de Maupeou redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Charles de Maupeou listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Charles de Maupeou. Since you had some involvement with the Charles de Maupeou redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Rene Nicolas de Maupeou listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rene Nicolas de Maupeou. Since you had some involvement with the Rene Nicolas de Maupeou redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Hack worked listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hack worked. Since you had some involvement with the Hack worked redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 03:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Hack-worked listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hack-worked. Since you had some involvement with the Hack-worked redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 04:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

God has held listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect God has held. Since you had some involvement with the God has held redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Without worth listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Without worth. Since you had some involvement with the Without worth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Has held listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Has held. Since you had some involvement with the Has held redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Deep place listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deep place. Since you had some involvement with the Deep place redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Shirtlessly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shirtlessly. Since you had some involvement with the Shirtlessly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Never to rise listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Never to rise. Since you had some involvement with the Never to rise redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

May have no rising listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect May have no rising. Since you had some involvement with the May have no rising redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Upper torso nudity listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Upper torso nudity. Since you had some involvement with the Upper torso nudity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Upper torso nakedness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Upper torso nakedness. Since you had some involvement with the Upper torso nakedness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Naked upper torso listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Naked upper torso. Since you had some involvement with the Naked upper torso redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Naked upper torsos listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Naked upper torsos. Since you had some involvement with the Naked upper torsos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Nude upper torso listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nude upper torso. Since you had some involvement with the Nude upper torso redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Greyishblue listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greyishblue. Since you had some involvement with the Greyishblue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Galocher listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Galocher. Since you had some involvement with the Galocher redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Emballer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Emballer. Since you had some involvement with the Emballer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nude upper torsos listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nude upper torsos. Since you had some involvement with the Nude upper torsos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Self-examination
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Self-examination, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.definitions.net/definition/breast%20self-examination.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

First Unitarian Church of Salem listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect First Unitarian Church of Salem. Since you had some involvement with the First Unitarian Church of Salem redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Frenchings listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frenchings. Since you had some involvement with the Frenchings redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blackishgray listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackishgray. Since you had some involvement with the Blackishgray redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-objective listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-objective. Since you had some involvement with the Non-objective redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Nonobjectivism listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nonobjectivism. Since you had some involvement with the Nonobjectivism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Nonobjectivistic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nonobjectivistic. Since you had some involvement with the Nonobjectivistic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Fully commingle listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fully commingle. Since you had some involvement with the Fully commingle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Single game listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single game. Since you had some involvement with the Single game redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Singleplaying game listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singleplaying game. Since you had some involvement with the Singleplaying game redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Single gamer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single gamer. Since you had some involvement with the Single gamer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Labor unionistic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Labor unionistic. Since you had some involvement with the Labor unionistic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

One body listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect One body. Since you had some involvement with the One body redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Laborunionistic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Laborunionistic. Since you had some involvement with the Laborunionistic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Twobody listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Twobody. Since you had some involvement with the Twobody redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Fussingly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fussingly. Since you had some involvement with the Fussingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of White Dog Cafe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Dog Cafe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/White Dog Cafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 07:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

To put under listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect To put under. Since you had some involvement with the To put under redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greenisholives
Hello, Neelix. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Greenisholives, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SireWonton 17:40, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abstractionistically


A tag has been placed on Abstractionistically requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hack-rag listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hack-rag. Since you had some involvement with the Hack-rag redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Eye potato listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eye potato. Since you had some involvement with the Eye potato redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Sleep sugar listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sleep sugar. Since you had some involvement with the Sleep sugar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Eye potatoes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eye potatoes. Since you had some involvement with the Eye potatoes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Eye cheeses listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eye cheeses. Since you had some involvement with the Eye cheeses redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Eye cheese listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eye cheese. Since you had some involvement with the Eye cheese redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Eye crusty listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eye crusty. Since you had some involvement with the Eye crusty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Sleepies listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sleepies. Since you had some involvement with the Sleepies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Eye crusties listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eye crusties. Since you had some involvement with the Eye crusties redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Rigips listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rigips. Since you had some involvement with the Rigips redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Urban Mediamakers Film Festival


The article Urban Mediamakers Film Festival has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Is this enough of an event to justify its own article?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 21:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Roundtowered listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roundtowered. Since you had some involvement with the Roundtowered redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Round towered listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Round towered. Since you had some involvement with the Round towered redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Gyprocks listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gyprocks. Since you had some involvement with the Gyprocks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Round-towered listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Round-towered. Since you had some involvement with the Round-towered redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Sobbingly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sobbingly. Since you had some involvement with the Sobbingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Double coated listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Double coated. Since you had some involvement with the Double coated redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Dogskin listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dogskin. Since you had some involvement with the Dogskin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Women's Support Network of York Region for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Women's Support Network of York Region is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Women's Support Network of York Region until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Alliance Against Modern Slavery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Against Modern Slavery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alliance Against Modern Slavery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Expedition-race


A tag has been placed on Expedition-race, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 03:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lord Edward for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lord Edward is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lord Edward until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lantern Church


The article Lantern Church has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There is no significant claim of notability here. Just an event venue

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 06:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Everyone (play)


The article Everyone (play) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unremarkable play. minor mentions from 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 06:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Everyone (play) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Everyone (play) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Everyone (play) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 20:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Derek Cooke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Cooke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Derek Cooke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Laborunionist listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Laborunionist. Since you had some involvement with the Laborunionist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

In which the existence of God and the real distinction of mind and body, are demonstrated listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect In which the existence of God and the real distinction of mind and body, are demonstrated. Since you had some involvement with the In which the existence of God and the real distinction of mind and body, are demonstrated redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Women's Support Network listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Women&. Since you had some involvement with the Women's Support Network redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Women Support Network listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Women Support Network. Since you had some involvement with the Women Support Network redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Pathfinder (Command & Conquer) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pathfinder (Command &. Since you had some involvement with the Pathfinder (Command & Conquer) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 19:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Womens Support Network listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womens Support Network. Since you had some involvement with the Womens Support Network redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The Enemy Within (play) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Enemy Within (play). Since you had some involvement with the The Enemy Within (play) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Uruguay frog listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uruguay frog. Since you had some involvement with the Uruguay frog redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Wastie Deblois listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wastie Deblois. Since you had some involvement with the Wastie Deblois redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The White Dog Cafe listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The White Dog Cafe. Since you had some involvement with the The White Dog Cafe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singleslits listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singleslits. Since you had some involvement with the Singleslits redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Selfaggrandizement listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Selfaggrandizement. Since you had some involvement with the Selfaggrandizement redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Source Dance Company for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Source Dance Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Source Dance Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Atheistic evangelists listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Atheistic evangelists. Since you had some involvement with the Atheistic evangelists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of David Batstone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Batstone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Batstone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 13:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Buying Sex is Not a Sport for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buying Sex is Not a Sport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Buying Sex is Not a Sport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Agape International Missions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agape International Missions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Agape International Missions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of ACT Alberta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ACT Alberta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ACT Alberta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 14:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Shae Invidiata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shae Invidiata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shae Invidiata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 16:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Men Against Sexual Trafficking for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Men Against Sexual Trafficking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Men Against Sexual Trafficking until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 17:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Streetlight Support Services for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Streetlight Support Services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Streetlight Support Services until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 21:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of NASHI for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NASHI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NASHI until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kelly hi! 21:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Indianness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indianness. Since you had some involvement with the Indianness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Slutting listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slutting. Since you had some involvement with the Slutting redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Kayte listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kayte. Since you had some involvement with the Kayte redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 12:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Kaytie listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kaytie. Since you had some involvement with the Kaytie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Kitschiness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kitschiness. Since you had some involvement with the Kitschiness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shane Claiborne
Template:Shane Claiborne has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Legacypac (talk) 08:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chris Haw
Template:Chris Haw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Legacypac (talk) 08:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlewire line listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlewire line. Since you had some involvement with the Singlewire line redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Sextupleglazed glasses listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sextupleglazed glasses. Since you had some involvement with the Sextupleglazed glasses redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Greenisholives listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greenisholives. Since you had some involvement with the Greenisholives redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Domotor-Kolompar organization listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Domotor-Kolompar organization. Since you had some involvement with the Domotor-Kolompar organization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

The World, the Flesh and the Devil listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The World, the Flesh and the Devil. Since you had some involvement with the The World, the Flesh and the Devil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Find water listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Find water. Since you had some involvement with the Find water redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Ghazipour listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ghazipour. Since you had some involvement with the Ghazipour redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC) −

Gazpur listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gazpur. Since you had some involvement with the Gazpur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC) −

Æstheticism listed at Redirects for discussion
−	−	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Æstheticism. Since you had some involvement with the Æstheticism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

White-lips listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-lips. Since you had some involvement with the White-lips redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Whitelips listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whitelips. Since you had some involvement with the Whitelips redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)