User talk:Neelix/deletions/Archive 3

Appropriately listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Appropriately. Since you had some involvement with the Appropriately redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Appropriateness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Appropriateness. Since you had some involvement with the Appropriateness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Fyodor Terentjev listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fyodor Terentjev. Since you had some involvement with the Fyodor Terentjev redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Fastman listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fastman. Since you had some involvement with the Fastman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

FLRC
I have nominated List of cetaceans for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. sst✈discuss 18:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Ὑπόθεσις listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ὑπόθεσις. Since you had some involvement with the Ὑπόθεσις redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Badly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Badly. Since you had some involvement with the Badly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Baddest listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baddest. Since you had some involvement with the Baddest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Egregiousness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egregiousness. Since you had some involvement with the Egregiousness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Egregiously listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egregiously. Since you had some involvement with the Egregiously redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Egregiosity listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egregiosity. Since you had some involvement with the Egregiosity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Egregiosities listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egregiosities. Since you had some involvement with the Egregiosities redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

André Constant van Hasselt listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect André Constant van Hasselt. Since you had some involvement with the André Constant van Hasselt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

André Henri van Hasselt listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect André Henri van Hasselt. Since you had some involvement with the André Henri van Hasselt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Douzaine listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Douzaine. Since you had some involvement with the Douzaine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Brown-Séquard listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brown-Séquard. Since you had some involvement with the Brown-Séquard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Knows listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Knows. Since you had some involvement with the Knows redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Lord Ed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lord Ed. Since you had some involvement with the Lord Ed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Beaver (FBI agent) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Beaver (FBI agent) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mike Beaver (FBI agent) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Gabriel Rossetti listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gabriel Rossetti. Since you had some involvement with the Gabriel Rossetti redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sexual trader listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sexual trader. Since you had some involvement with the Sexual trader redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sex traders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sex traders. Since you had some involvement with the Sex traders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sex trader listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sex trader. Since you had some involvement with the Sex trader redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sexual traders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sexual traders. Since you had some involvement with the Sexual traders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sex-trader listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sex-trader. Since you had some involvement with the Sex-trader redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sextrader listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sextrader. Since you had some involvement with the Sextrader redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sex-traders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sex-traders. Since you had some involvement with the Sex-traders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sextraders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sextraders. Since you had some involvement with the Sextraders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Florida Abolitionist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florida Abolitionist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Florida Abolitionist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Helen Sworn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helen Sworn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Helen Sworn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lauran Bethell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauran Bethell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lauran Bethell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 11:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Hackworked listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hackworked. Since you had some involvement with the Hackworked redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 04:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Self-examination for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Self-examination is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Self-examination until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of dance companies in Canada for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of dance companies in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of dance companies in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Yvon Dandurand for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yvon Dandurand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yvon Dandurand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 23:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hotel Grand Pacific


The article Hotel Grand Pacific has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * run of the mill 4 star hotel with no historical significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 23:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Douglas Park (Langley) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Park (Langley) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Douglas Park (Langley) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Riverside Park (Kamloops) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riverside Park (Kamloops) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Riverside Park (Kamloops) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Anthony Palmer (judge) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Palmer (judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anthony Palmer (judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Light News listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Light News. Since you had some involvement with the Light News redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of City Light News for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article City Light News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/City Light News until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Möttölä listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Möttölä. Since you had some involvement with the Möttölä redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Mottölä listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mottölä. Since you had some involvement with the Mottölä redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Möttolä listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Möttolä. Since you had some involvement with the Möttolä redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Möttöla listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Möttöla. Since you had some involvement with the Möttöla redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Hanno Mottöla listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hanno Mottöla. Since you had some involvement with the Hanno Mottöla redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Iloc listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iloc. Since you had some involvement with the Iloc redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tap-riz


A tag has been placed on Tap-riz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
 * It is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 10:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Ta ta listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ta ta. Since you had some involvement with the Ta ta redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Ta-ta listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ta-ta. Since you had some involvement with the Ta-ta redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Strength of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Strength of God. Since you had some involvement with the Strength of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Master of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Master of God. Since you had some involvement with the Master of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Master, of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Master, of God. Since you had some involvement with the Master, of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Wastie listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wastie. Since you had some involvement with the Wastie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Gentle manlier listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gentle manlier. Since you had some involvement with the Gentle manlier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Gentle man lier listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gentle man lier. Since you had some involvement with the Gentle man lier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Gentleman lier listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gentleman lier. Since you had some involvement with the Gentleman lier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Gentlemanliest listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gentlemanliest. Since you had some involvement with the Gentlemanliest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Gentleman-like listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gentleman-like. Since you had some involvement with the Gentleman-like redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Doctor Tom (historian) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doctor Tom (historian). Since you had some involvement with the Doctor Tom (historian) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Doctor Tom (wrestler) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doctor Tom (wrestler). Since you had some involvement with the Doctor Tom (wrestler) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Modern Painter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Modern Painter. Since you had some involvement with the Modern Painter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Tender mother listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tender mother. Since you had some involvement with the Tender mother redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Ticket booth listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ticket booth. Since you had some involvement with the Ticket booth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Mice Squad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Mice Squad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Mice Squad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 07:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

DIH (railway station) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DIH (railway station). Since you had some involvement with the DIH (railway station) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 00:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single link listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single link. Since you had some involvement with the Single link redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-link listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-link. Since you had some involvement with the Single-link redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlelink listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlelink. Since you had some involvement with the Singlelink redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single links listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single links. Since you had some involvement with the Single links redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-links listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-links. Since you had some involvement with the Single-links redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlelinks listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlelinks. Since you had some involvement with the Singlelinks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single linking listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single linking. Since you had some involvement with the Single linking redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-linking listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-linking. Since you had some involvement with the Single-linking redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single linked listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single linked. Since you had some involvement with the Single linked redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-linked listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-linked. Since you had some involvement with the Single-linked redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlelinked listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlelinked. Since you had some involvement with the Singlelinked redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single linker listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single linker. Since you had some involvement with the Single linker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlelinker listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlelinker. Since you had some involvement with the Singlelinker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single linkers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single linkers. Since you had some involvement with the Single linkers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-linkers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-linkers. Since you had some involvement with the Single-linkers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlelinkers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlelinkers. Since you had some involvement with the Singlelinkers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-linker listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-linker. Since you had some involvement with the Single-linker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbor clustering listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbor clustering. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbor clustering redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbour clustering listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbour clustering. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbour clustering redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbor cluster listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbor cluster. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbor cluster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbour cluster listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbour cluster. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbour cluster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbor clusters listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbor clusters. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbor clusters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbour clusters listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbour clusters. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbour clusters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbor clusterings listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbor clusterings. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbor clusterings redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nearest neighbour clusterings listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest neighbour clusterings. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest neighbour clusterings redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-speed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-speed. Since you had some involvement with the Single-speed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single speeds listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single speeds. Since you had some involvement with the Single speeds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-speeds listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-speeds. Since you had some involvement with the Single-speeds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlespeeds listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlespeeds. Since you had some involvement with the Singlespeeds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single speeding listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single speeding. Since you had some involvement with the Single speeding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-speeding listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-speeding. Since you had some involvement with the Single-speeding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlespeeding listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlespeeding. Since you had some involvement with the Singlespeeding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single speeded listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single speeded. Since you had some involvement with the Single speeded redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-speeded listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-speeded. Since you had some involvement with the Single-speeded redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlespeeded listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlespeeded. Since you had some involvement with the Singlespeeded redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single speeder listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single speeder. Since you had some involvement with the Single speeder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-speeder listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-speeder. Since you had some involvement with the Single-speeder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlespeeder listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlespeeder. Since you had some involvement with the Singlespeeder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single speeders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single speeders. Since you had some involvement with the Single speeders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-speeders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-speeders. Since you had some involvement with the Single-speeders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlespeeders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlespeeders. Since you had some involvement with the Singlespeeders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater. Since you had some involvement with the Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci-Fi Dine-In listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci-Fi Dine-In. Since you had some involvement with the Sci-Fi Dine-In redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci Fi Dine In Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci Fi Dine In Theater. Since you had some involvement with the Sci Fi Dine In Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci Fi Dine In listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci Fi Dine In. Since you had some involvement with the Sci Fi Dine In redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci-Fi Dine In Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci-Fi Dine In Theater. Since you had some involvement with the Sci-Fi Dine In Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci-Fi Dine In listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci-Fi Dine In. Since you had some involvement with the Sci-Fi Dine In redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci Fi Dine-In listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci Fi Dine-In. Since you had some involvement with the Sci Fi Dine-In redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sci Fi Dine-In Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci Fi Dine-In Theater. Since you had some involvement with the Sci Fi Dine-In Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

SciFi Dine-In listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SciFi Dine-In. Since you had some involvement with the SciFi Dine-In redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

SciFi Dine-In Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SciFi Dine-In Theater. Since you had some involvement with the SciFi Dine-In Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

SciFi Dine In Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SciFi Dine In Theater. Since you had some involvement with the SciFi Dine In Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

SciFi Dine In listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SciFi Dine In. Since you had some involvement with the SciFi Dine In redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant. Since you had some involvement with the The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theatre Restaurant listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theatre Restaurant. Since you had some involvement with the The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theatre Restaurant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater. Since you had some involvement with the The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theatre listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theatre. Since you had some involvement with the The Sci-Fi Dine-In Theatre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sci-Fi Dine-In Restaurant listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sci-Fi Dine-In Restaurant. Since you had some involvement with the The Sci-Fi Dine-In Restaurant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sci-Fi Dine-In listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sci-Fi Dine-In. Since you had some involvement with the The Sci-Fi Dine-In redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White-line listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-line. Since you had some involvement with the White-line redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White-lines listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-lines. Since you had some involvement with the White-lines redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White-lined listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-lined. Since you had some involvement with the White-lined redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White-lining listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-lining. Since you had some involvement with the White-lining redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White-liner listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-liner. Since you had some involvement with the White-liner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White-liners listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-liners. Since you had some involvement with the White-liners redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White lined listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White lined. Since you had some involvement with the White lined redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White lining listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White lining. Since you had some involvement with the White lining redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White liner listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White liner. Since you had some involvement with the White liner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

White liners listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White liners. Since you had some involvement with the White liners redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Virgin Islands of the U S listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Virgin Islands of the U S. Since you had some involvement with the The Virgin Islands of the U S redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Virgin Islands of the U. S. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Virgin Islands of the U. S.. Since you had some involvement with the The Virgin Islands of the U. S. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Virgin Islands of the U.S. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Virgin Islands of the U.S.. Since you had some involvement with the The Virgin Islands of the U.S. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Virgin Islands of the US listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Virgin Islands of the US. Since you had some involvement with the The Virgin Islands of the US redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Virgin Islands of the United States listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Virgin Islands of the United States. Since you had some involvement with the The Virgin Islands of the United States redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The U S Virgin Islands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The U S Virgin Islands. Since you had some involvement with the The U S Virgin Islands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The U. S. Virgin Islands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The U. S. Virgin Islands. Since you had some involvement with the The U. S. Virgin Islands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The U.S. Virgin Islands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The U.S. Virgin Islands. Since you had some involvement with the The U.S. Virgin Islands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The US Virgin Islands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The US Virgin Islands. Since you had some involvement with the The US Virgin Islands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The National Epic of Finland listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The National Epic of Finland. Since you had some involvement with the The National Epic of Finland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Women of Distinction Awards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Women of Distinction Awards. Since you had some involvement with the The Women of Distinction Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Women of Distinction Award listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Women of Distinction Award. Since you had some involvement with the The Women of Distinction Award redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Woman of Distinction Awards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Woman of Distinction Awards. Since you had some involvement with the The Woman of Distinction Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Woman of Distinction Award listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Woman of Distinction Award. Since you had some involvement with the The Woman of Distinction Award redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 15:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Young Women's Christian Association Woman of Distinction Award listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Young Women&. Since you had some involvement with the The Young Women's Christian Association Woman of Distinction Award redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Young Womens Christian Association Women of Distinction Awards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Young Womens Christian Association Women of Distinction Awards. Since you had some involvement with the The Young Womens Christian Association Women of Distinction Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Young Womens Christian Association Woman of Distinction Awards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Young Womens Christian Association Woman of Distinction Awards. Since you had some involvement with the The Young Womens Christian Association Woman of Distinction Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Young Womens Christian Association Women of Distinction Award listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Young Womens Christian Association Women of Distinction Award. Since you had some involvement with the The Young Womens Christian Association Women of Distinction Award redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Young Womens Christian Association Woman of Distinction Award listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Young Womens Christian Association Woman of Distinction Award. Since you had some involvement with the The Young Womens Christian Association Woman of Distinction Award redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The YWCA Women of Distinction Award listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The YWCA Women of Distinction Award. Since you had some involvement with the The YWCA Women of Distinction Award redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The YWCA Women of Distinction Awards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The YWCA Women of Distinction Awards. Since you had some involvement with the The YWCA Women of Distinction Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Bed dances listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bed dances. Since you had some involvement with the Bed dances redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Bed danced listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bed danced. Since you had some involvement with the Bed danced redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Bed dancing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bed dancing. Since you had some involvement with the Bed dancing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Bed dancer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bed dancer. Since you had some involvement with the Bed dancer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Bed dancers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bed dancers. Since you had some involvement with the Bed dancers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Frencher listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frencher. Since you had some involvement with the Frencher redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Father George listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Father George. Since you had some involvement with the Father George redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Bishop George listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop George. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop George redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Charles Hart-Davis listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Charles Hart-Davis. Since you had some involvement with the Charles Hart-Davis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sir Charles Hart-Davis listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sir Charles Hart-Davis. Since you had some involvement with the Sir Charles Hart-Davis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bombings in Mogadishu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bombings in Mogadishu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bombings in Mogadishu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Flame of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flame of God. Since you had some involvement with the Flame of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Light of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Light of God. Since you had some involvement with the Light of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Bir' as-Sabi listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bir&. Since you had some involvement with the Bir' as-Sabi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

The birth of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The birth of God. Since you had some involvement with the The birth of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Lion like listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lion like. Since you had some involvement with the Lion like redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

‘Ραμιήλ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ‘Ραμιήλ. Since you had some involvement with the ‘Ραμιήλ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Thunder of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thunder of God. Since you had some involvement with the Thunder of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Râmêêl listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Râmêêl. Since you had some involvement with the Râmêêl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Evening of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Evening of God. Since you had some involvement with the Evening of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Compassion of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Compassion of God. Since you had some involvement with the Compassion of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Beauty of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beauty of God. Since you had some involvement with the Beauty of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Divine Beauty listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Divine Beauty. Since you had some involvement with the Divine Beauty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Red aspect listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Red aspect. Since you had some involvement with the Red aspect redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Sir Hart Davis listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sir Hart Davis. Since you had some involvement with the Sir Hart Davis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Singlelevelers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singlelevelers. Since you had some involvement with the Singlelevelers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Carry before listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carry before. Since you had some involvement with the Carry before redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

To be set above listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect To be set above. Since you had some involvement with the To be set above redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Set above listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Set above. Since you had some involvement with the Set above redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

To be set over listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect To be set over. Since you had some involvement with the To be set over redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Set over listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Set over. Since you had some involvement with the Set over redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

To prefer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect To prefer. Since you had some involvement with the To prefer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roister listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roister. Since you had some involvement with the Roister redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roisters listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roisters. Since you had some involvement with the Roisters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roistered listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roistered. Since you had some involvement with the Roistered redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roistering listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roistering. Since you had some involvement with the Roistering redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roisterer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roisterer. Since you had some involvement with the Roisterer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roisterers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roisterers. Since you had some involvement with the Roisterers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roisterous listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roisterous. Since you had some involvement with the Roisterous redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Roisterously listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roisterously. Since you had some involvement with the Roisterously redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Single ship listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single ship. Since you had some involvement with the Single ship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:43, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Singleship listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Singleship. Since you had some involvement with the Singleship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Single ships listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single ships. Since you had some involvement with the Single ships redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Philipp von Beckedorff listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philipp von Beckedorff. Since you had some involvement with the Philipp von Beckedorff redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Unisexy listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unisexy. Since you had some involvement with the Unisexy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Unisexer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unisexer. Since you had some involvement with the Unisexer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Unisexes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unisexes. Since you had some involvement with the Unisexes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Unisexed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unisexed. Since you had some involvement with the Unisexed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Unisexers listed at Redirects for discussion Result = retargeted
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unisexers. Since you had some involvement with the Unisexers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Ombelico listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ombelico. Since you had some involvement with the Ombelico redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Naval of Sicily listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Naval of Sicily. Since you had some involvement with the Naval of Sicily redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Demon of the pit listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Demon of the pit. Since you had some involvement with the Demon of the pit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 12:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

My father is exalted listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect My father is exalted. Since you had some involvement with the My father is exalted redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Holger Wahlstrom listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Holger Wahlstrom. Since you had some involvement with the Holger Wahlstrom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 13:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Nazist collaborators listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nazist collaborators. Since you had some involvement with the Nazist collaborators redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Nazist collaborator listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nazist collaborator. Since you had some involvement with the Nazist collaborator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Nazist collaborators during World War II listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nazist collaborators during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Nazist collaborators during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Aestheticistical listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aestheticistical. Since you had some involvement with the Aestheticistical redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Estheticists listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Estheticists. Since you had some involvement with the Estheticists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Friend of the most high God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Friend of the most high God. Since you had some involvement with the Friend of the most high God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Eastview Community Church for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastview Community Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eastview Community Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 19:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Stepsisterness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stepsisterness. Since you had some involvement with the Stepsisterness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Loud-roaring listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Loud-roaring. Since you had some involvement with the Loud-roaring redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Foothills Alliance Church


The article Foothills Alliance Church has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable local church page by Neelix. Reads like an ad.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Foothills Alliance Church for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foothills Alliance Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Foothills Alliance Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Unisexily listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unisexily. Since you had some involvement with the Unisexily redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Unisexing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unisexing. Since you had some involvement with the Unisexing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:53, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Nazist collaborator during World War II listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nazist collaborator during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Nazist collaborator during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-sexes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-sexes. Since you had some involvement with the Single-sexes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Single-sex listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single-sex. Since you had some involvement with the Single-sex redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:39, 20 November 2015 (UTC)