User talk:Neelix/deletions/Archive 6

Shag like listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shag like. Since you had some involvement with the Shag like redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Fawnlike listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fawnlike. Since you had some involvement with the Fawnlike redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Single play video game listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Single play video game. Since you had some involvement with the Single play video game redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Or not listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Or not. Since you had some involvement with the Or not redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Whitenose listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whitenose. Since you had some involvement with the Whitenose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Prefigurational listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prefigurational. Since you had some involvement with the Prefigurational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Gabbles listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gabbles. Since you had some involvement with the Gabbles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

One-horse listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect One-horse. Since you had some involvement with the One-horse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wankily listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wankily. Since you had some involvement with the Wankily redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Cuts up listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cuts up. Since you had some involvement with the Cuts up redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Aquaristically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aquaristically. Since you had some involvement with the Aquaristically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Fish bowled listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fish bowled. Since you had some involvement with the Fish bowled redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wank stain listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wank stain. Since you had some involvement with the Wank stain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wank stains listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wank stains. Since you had some involvement with the Wank stains redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wankstain listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wankstain. Since you had some involvement with the Wankstain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wankstains listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wankstains. Since you had some involvement with the Wankstains redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Strangle holders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Strangle holders. Since you had some involvement with the Strangle holders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Exoticists listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Exoticists. Since you had some involvement with the Exoticists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wanks listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wanks. Since you had some involvement with the Wanks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Exoticizers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Exoticizers. Since you had some involvement with the Exoticizers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Effing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Effing. Since you had some involvement with the Effing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Exoticisms listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Exoticisms. Since you had some involvement with the Exoticisms redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Effer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Effer. Since you had some involvement with the Effer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Effers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Effers. Since you had some involvement with the Effers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Effingly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Effingly. Since you had some involvement with the Effingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Effs listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Effs. Since you had some involvement with the Effs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Fuckingly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fuckingly. Since you had some involvement with the Fuckingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Happy hour sort listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Happy hour sort. Since you had some involvement with the Happy hour sort redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PleaseStand (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Happy hour sorted listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Happy hour sorted. Since you had some involvement with the Happy hour sorted redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Double direction listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Double direction. Since you had some involvement with the Double direction redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Happy hour sorter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Happy hour sorter. Since you had some involvement with the Happy hour sorter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Happy hour sorting listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Happy hour sorting. Since you had some involvement with the Happy hour sorting redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Happy hour sorts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Happy hour sorts. Since you had some involvement with the Happy hour sorts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Double-direction listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Double-direction. Since you had some involvement with the Double-direction redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Greygreen listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greygreen. Since you had some involvement with the Greygreen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Wanked listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wanked. Since you had some involvement with the Wanked redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masturbational listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masturbational. Since you had some involvement with the Masturbational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masturbationally listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masturbationally. Since you had some involvement with the Masturbationally redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wanky listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wanky. Since you had some involvement with the Wanky redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masturbators listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masturbators. Since you had some involvement with the Masturbators redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Trinidadian river listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trinidadian river. Since you had some involvement with the Trinidadian river redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Reestablishment listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reestablishment. Since you had some involvement with the Reestablishment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Gentleman-farmer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gentleman-farmer. Since you had some involvement with the Gentleman-farmer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Mother Teresa the Saint listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mother Teresa the Saint. Since you had some involvement with the Mother Teresa the Saint redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Christ's sake listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Christ&. Since you had some involvement with the Christ's sake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adult Entertainment Association of Canada


The article Adult Entertainment Association of Canada has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable,only represents 53 of 140 strip clubs in Ontario, not all of Canada

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

For the love of Christ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect For the love of Christ. Since you had some involvement with the For the love of Christ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

For Christ' Sake listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect For Christ&. Since you had some involvement with the For Christ' Sake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Saint Lucian rivers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Saint Lucian rivers. Since you had some involvement with the Saint Lucian rivers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Alaskan rivers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alaskan rivers. Since you had some involvement with the Alaskan rivers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Trinidadian rivers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trinidadian rivers. Since you had some involvement with the Trinidadian rivers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Good ale listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Good ale. Since you had some involvement with the Good ale redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wankier listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wankier. Since you had some involvement with the Wankier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masturbatorily listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masturbatorily. Since you had some involvement with the Masturbatorily redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masterbatory listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbatory. Since you had some involvement with the Masterbatory redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masterbationally listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbationally. Since you had some involvement with the Masterbationally redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masterbational listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbational. Since you had some involvement with the Masterbational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masterbated listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbated. Since you had some involvement with the Masterbated redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Masterbates listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbates. Since you had some involvement with the Masterbates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wankiest listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wankiest. Since you had some involvement with the Wankiest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Volkswagen T2 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Volkswagen T2. Since you had some involvement with the Volkswagen T2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Super hard listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Super hard. Since you had some involvement with the Super hard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Doubledirection listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doubledirection. Since you had some involvement with the Doubledirection redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Alberta Law Enforcement Response Teams listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alberta Law Enforcement Response Teams. Since you had some involvement with the Alberta Law Enforcement Response Teams redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Sun-lounges listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sun-lounges. Since you had some involvement with the Sun-lounges redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Миха́йлович listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Миха́йлович. Since you had some involvement with the Миха́йлович redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Artificial objects listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Artificial objects. Since you had some involvement with the Artificial objects redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Iana Matel listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iana Matel. Since you had some involvement with the Iana Matel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Chikan Densha: Chōhatsusuru Midara Shiri listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chikan Densha: Chōhatsusuru Midara Shiri. Since you had some involvement with the Chikan Densha: Chōhatsusuru Midara Shiri redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Arajin listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arajin. Since you had some involvement with the Arajin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Alabama state park listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alabama state park. Since you had some involvement with the Alabama state park redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

White-slavery listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-slavery. Since you had some involvement with the White-slavery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

White-slaves listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-slaves. Since you had some involvement with the White-slaves redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Whiteslaves listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whiteslaves. Since you had some involvement with the Whiteslaves redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Whiteslavery listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whiteslavery. Since you had some involvement with the Whiteslavery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Whiteslave listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whiteslave. Since you had some involvement with the Whiteslave redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Hustler (prostitute) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hustler (prostitute). Since you had some involvement with the Hustler (prostitute) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Blackishly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackishly. Since you had some involvement with the Blackishly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Blackest listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackest. Since you had some involvement with the Blackest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Blackly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackly. Since you had some involvement with the Blackly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Blackishness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackishness. Since you had some involvement with the Blackishness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Whiten listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whiten. Since you had some involvement with the Whiten redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

U.S. Virgin Island listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U.S. Virgin Island. Since you had some involvement with the U.S. Virgin Island redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Frideric listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frideric. Since you had some involvement with the Frideric redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Goldspotted frog listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Goldspotted frog. Since you had some involvement with the Goldspotted frog redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Goldspotted frogs listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Goldspotted frogs. Since you had some involvement with the Goldspotted frogs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Asset-backed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Asset-backed. Since you had some involvement with the Asset-backed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 03:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

UASVMCN listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect UASVMCN. Since you had some involvement with the UASVMCN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 04:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Lizardheaded frogs listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lizardheaded frogs. Since you had some involvement with the Lizardheaded frogs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Longlegged cricket frogs listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Longlegged cricket frogs. Since you had some involvement with the Longlegged cricket frogs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Longlegged cricket frog listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Longlegged cricket frog. Since you had some involvement with the Longlegged cricket frog redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Lizardheaded frog listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lizardheaded frog. Since you had some involvement with the Lizardheaded frog redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Stark Mele listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stark Mele. Since you had some involvement with the Stark Mele redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 05:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Franz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Franz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph Franz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ( talk ) 06:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Masterbated listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbated. Since you had some involvement with the Masterbated redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Masterbatory listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbatory. Since you had some involvement with the Masterbatory redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Shenae listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shenae. Since you had some involvement with the Shenae redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Methylene oxides listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Methylene oxides. Since you had some involvement with the Methylene oxides redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Reader responses listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reader responses. Since you had some involvement with the Reader responses redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Her Majesty Queen Alexandra listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Her Majesty Queen Alexandra. Since you had some involvement with the Her Majesty Queen Alexandra redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Civilising listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Civilising. Since you had some involvement with the Civilising redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Civilises listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Civilises. Since you had some involvement with the Civilises redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Precivilized listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Precivilized. Since you had some involvement with the Precivilized redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Precivilised listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Precivilised. Since you had some involvement with the Precivilised redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Civilizes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Civilizes. Since you had some involvement with the Civilizes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Make shift listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Make shift. Since you had some involvement with the Make shift redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paddle wheels


A tag has been placed on Paddle wheels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

this redirect was made by Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paddlewheels


A tag has been placed on Paddlewheels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

I've decided to go through the Neelix redirects and help to remove them.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sidewheels


A tag has been placed on Sidewheels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Side wheel


A tag has been placed on Side wheel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Side wheels


A tag has been placed on Side wheels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seeyahumba


A tag has been placed on Seeyahumba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of We Are Marching


A tag has been placed on We Are Marching requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of We Are Singing


A tag has been placed on We Are Singing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of We Are Marching in the Light of God


A tag has been placed on We Are Marching in the Light of God requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of We are standing in the light of peace


A tag has been placed on We are standing in the light of peace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sternwheels


A tag has been placed on Sternwheels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stern-wheel


A tag has been placed on Stern-wheel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imbue


A tag has been placed on Imbue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imbues


A tag has been placed on Imbues requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imbued


A tag has been placed on Imbued requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imbuer


A tag has been placed on Imbuer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imbuers


A tag has been placed on Imbuers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 19:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Premeative


A tag has been placed on Premeative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Permeative


A tag has been placed on Permeative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix nonsense

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Permeatively


A tag has been placed on Permeatively requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix nonsense

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Permeatingly


A tag has been placed on Permeatingly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Side wheel


A tag has been placed on Side wheel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ches (talk) 20:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Blackish listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackish. Since you had some involvement with the Blackish redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Blackish orange listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blackish orange. Since you had some involvement with the Blackish orange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orangeishly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangeishly. Since you had some involvement with the Orangeishly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orangeish brown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangeish brown. Since you had some involvement with the Orangeish brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Brownish orange listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brownish orange. Since you had some involvement with the Brownish orange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Orangeish brown for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orangeish brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Orangeish brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orangish brown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangish brown. Since you had some involvement with the Orangish brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orangish-brown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangish-brown. Since you had some involvement with the Orangish-brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orangeish-brown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangeish-brown. Since you had some involvement with the Orangeish-brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Brownish-orange listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brownish-orange. Since you had some involvement with the Brownish-orange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orange-brown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orange-brown. Since you had some involvement with the Orange-brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Brown-orange listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brown-orange. Since you had some involvement with the Brown-orange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orangebrown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orangebrown. Since you had some involvement with the Orangebrown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orange brown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orange brown. Since you had some involvement with the Orange brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Brown orange listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brown orange. Since you had some involvement with the Brown orange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Reddish-gray listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reddish-gray. Since you had some involvement with the Reddish-gray redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Grayish-red listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grayish-red. Since you had some involvement with the Grayish-red redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Grayish red listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grayish red. Since you had some involvement with the Grayish red redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Reddish gray listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reddish gray. Since you had some involvement with the Reddish gray redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Reddish grey listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reddish grey. Since you had some involvement with the Reddish grey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Reddish-grey listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reddish-grey. Since you had some involvement with the Reddish-grey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Greyish-red listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greyish-red. Since you had some involvement with the Greyish-red redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Greyish red listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greyish red. Since you had some involvement with the Greyish red redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Grey-red listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grey-red. Since you had some involvement with the Grey-red redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Gray-red listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gray-red. Since you had some involvement with the Gray-red redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Red-gray listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Red-gray. Since you had some involvement with the Red-gray redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Red-grey listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Red-grey. Since you had some involvement with the Red-grey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Purplereds listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Purplereds. Since you had some involvement with the Purplereds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Redviolets listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Redviolets. Since you had some involvement with the Redviolets redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Slatish blue listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slatish blue. Since you had some involvement with the Slatish blue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Slatish gray listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slatish gray. Since you had some involvement with the Slatish gray redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Πεδία listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Πεδία. Since you had some involvement with the Πεδία redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Nonnes Preestes Tale of the Cok and the Hen, Chauntecleer and Pertelote listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nonnes Preestes Tale of the Cok and the Hen, Chauntecleer and Pertelote. Since you had some involvement with the Nonnes Preestes Tale of the Cok and the Hen, Chauntecleer and Pertelote redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Spasmology listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spasmology. Since you had some involvement with the Spasmology redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Spasmodics listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spasmodics. Since you had some involvement with the Spasmodics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Startingly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Startingly. Since you had some involvement with the Startingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Sweetly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sweetly. Since you had some involvement with the Sweetly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

La gaya scienza listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect La gaya scienza. Since you had some involvement with the La gaya scienza redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 04:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Matrics listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Matrics. Since you had some involvement with the Matrics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Upperlip listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Upperlip. Since you had some involvement with the Upperlip redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Belbury listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Belbury. Since you had some involvement with the Belbury redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 13:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Stuhl listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stuhl. Since you had some involvement with the Stuhl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 04:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Grizzles listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Grizzles. Since you had some involvement with the Grizzles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 05:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Mellstock listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mellstock. Since you had some involvement with the Mellstock redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Spread-eagleists listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spread-eagleists. Since you had some involvement with the Spread-eagleists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Spirit lamp listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spirit lamp. Since you had some involvement with the Spirit lamp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Spirit lamps listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spirit lamps. Since you had some involvement with the Spirit lamps redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Carrhotus malayanus listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carrhotus malayanus. Since you had some involvement with the Carrhotus malayanus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Faithlessly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Faithlessly. Since you had some involvement with the Faithlessly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ~ RobTalk 04:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Changed people listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Changed people. Since you had some involvement with the Changed people redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ~ RobTalk 04:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Frohlinde listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frohlinde. Since you had some involvement with the Frohlinde redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Aurora Awards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aurora Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aurora Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS 4444 Talk  08:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Youssof listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Youssof. Since you had some involvement with the Youssof redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Myopically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Myopically. Since you had some involvement with the Myopically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Illuminato listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Illuminato. Since you had some involvement with the Illuminato redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Adélaïde-Gillette Billet listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Adélaïde-Gillette Billet. Since you had some involvement with the Adélaïde-Gillette Billet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Irritant (biology) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Irritant (biology). Since you had some involvement with the Irritant (biology) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Taciturnity listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Taciturnity. Since you had some involvement with the Taciturnity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Slipperjack listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slipperjack. Since you had some involvement with the Slipperjack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Slipper jack listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slipper jack. Since you had some involvement with the Slipper jack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Pueblo of Laguna listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pueblo of Laguna. Since you had some involvement with the Pueblo of Laguna redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 16:15, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeff Deyo Unveil.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Jeff Deyo Unveil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Stack house listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stack house. Since you had some involvement with the Stack house redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Potawatomies listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Potawatomies. Since you had some involvement with the Potawatomies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Frenches listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frenches. Since you had some involvement with the Frenches redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

God's chosen people listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect God&. Since you had some involvement with the God's chosen people redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Herr Blair listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Herr Blair. Since you had some involvement with the Herr Blair redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Labille listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Labille. Since you had some involvement with the Labille redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Congeals listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Congeals. Since you had some involvement with the Congeals redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

John Faustus listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Faustus. Since you had some involvement with the John Faustus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Greets listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greets. Since you had some involvement with the Greets redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Chroma-keyers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chroma-keyers. Since you had some involvement with the Chroma-keyers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Chroma keyed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chroma keyed. Since you had some involvement with the Chroma keyed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Color keyer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Color keyer. Since you had some involvement with the Color keyer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Color keyers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Color keyers. Since you had some involvement with the Color keyers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Colour key listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Colour key. Since you had some involvement with the Colour key redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Green-Tao listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Green-Tao. Since you had some involvement with the Green-Tao redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

White band listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White band. Since you had some involvement with the White band redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

White bands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White bands. Since you had some involvement with the White bands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

White-berry listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-berry. Since you had some involvement with the White-berry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Litigious listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Litigious. Since you had some involvement with the Litigious redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 23:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Litigiously listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Litigiously. Since you had some involvement with the Litigiously redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 23:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Litigiousness listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Litigiousness. Since you had some involvement with the Litigiousness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)