User talk:Neelix/deletions/Archive 9

New flower listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New flower. Since you had some involvement with the New flower redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

For the sake of honor listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect For the sake of honor. Since you had some involvement with the For the sake of honor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Indian America listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indian America. Since you had some involvement with the Indian America redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

International Council of Religious Education listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect International Council of Religious Education. Since you had some involvement with the International Council of Religious Education redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Proverbially listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Proverbially. Since you had some involvement with the Proverbially redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Full blood listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Full blood. Since you had some involvement with the Full blood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Little spirit listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Little spirit. Since you had some involvement with the Little spirit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Spirit power listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spirit power. Since you had some involvement with the Spirit power redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Spirit powers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spirit powers. Since you had some involvement with the Spirit powers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quickie (divorce) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Quickie (divorce). Since you had some involvement with the Quickie (divorce) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Song of God listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Song of God. Since you had some involvement with the Song of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Suprahumanity listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Suprahumanity. Since you had some involvement with the Suprahumanity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Suprahumans listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Suprahumans. Since you had some involvement with the Suprahumans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Suprahuman listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Suprahuman. Since you had some involvement with the Suprahuman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Didactically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Didactically. Since you had some involvement with the Didactically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Didactical listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Didactical. Since you had some involvement with the Didactical redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Didacticly listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Didacticly. Since you had some involvement with the Didacticly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Pseudo-objective listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pseudo-objective. Since you had some involvement with the Pseudo-objective redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Pseudo-objectivity listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pseudo-objectivity. Since you had some involvement with the Pseudo-objectivity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Pseudo-objectively listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pseudo-objectively. Since you had some involvement with the Pseudo-objectively redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Albert George


The article Albert George has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * At WP:APO, we don't create set indexes with a [given name + middle name] format. There's no evidence that "Albert George" was a double name for any of these people.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Calculably listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Calculably. Since you had some involvement with the Calculably redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Calculability listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Calculability. Since you had some involvement with the Calculability redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Calculable listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Calculable. Since you had some involvement with the Calculable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Calculatable listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Calculatable. Since you had some involvement with the Calculatable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Albert George for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert George is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Albert George until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enemylove


A tag has been placed on Enemylove requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Nonsense Neelix redirect.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Clubjustin Talkosphere  05:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Transfiguration (song) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Transfiguration (song). Since you had some involvement with the Transfiguration (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Reunion (band) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reunion (band). Since you had some involvement with the Reunion (band) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

A Letter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A Letter. Since you had some involvement with the A Letter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Baahk listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baahk. Since you had some involvement with the Baahk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Leih listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leih. Since you had some involvement with the Leih redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Leih Baahk listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leih Baahk. Since you had some involvement with the Leih Baahk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Mage of Poems listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mage of Poems. Since you had some involvement with the Mage of Poems redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

The Mage of Poems listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Mage of Poems. Since you had some involvement with the The Mage of Poems redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Obdurate listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Obdurate. Since you had some involvement with the Obdurate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. KDS4444 (talk) 02:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Metainstitutions listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metainstitutions. Since you had some involvement with the Metainstitutions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 19:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Metainstitution listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metainstitution. Since you had some involvement with the Metainstitution redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 19:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Chestnut-leafed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chestnut-leafed. Since you had some involvement with the Chestnut-leafed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Plantdrew (talk) 01:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Teacher of philosophy listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teacher of philosophy. Since you had some involvement with the Teacher of philosophy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cristy


A tag has been placed on Cristy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Berek (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles Alfred


The article Charles Alfred has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is a WP:PTM violation as none of these people are known as "Charles Alfred." See also: Articles for deletion/Albert George

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Summer ford listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Summer ford. Since you had some involvement with the Summer ford redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Nontechnological listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nontechnological. Since you had some involvement with the Nontechnological redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Nontechnologically listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nontechnologically. Since you had some involvement with the Nontechnologically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Little key listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Little key. Since you had some involvement with the Little key redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Little keys listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Little keys. Since you had some involvement with the Little keys redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

A Cry listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A Cry. Since you had some involvement with the A Cry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Dobbed listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dobbed. Since you had some involvement with the Dobbed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 03:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Petrou listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Petrou. Since you had some involvement with the Petrou redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Womanised listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womanised. Since you had some involvement with the Womanised redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Womanises listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womanises. Since you had some involvement with the Womanises redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Womanising listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womanising. Since you had some involvement with the Womanising redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Womanisers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womanisers. Since you had some involvement with the Womanisers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Womanized listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womanized. Since you had some involvement with the Womanized redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Womanizes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womanizes. Since you had some involvement with the Womanizes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Womanizers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Womanizers. Since you had some involvement with the Womanizers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Complex consonants listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Complex consonants. Since you had some involvement with the Complex consonants redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tazerdadog (talk) 05:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Contests
User:Dr. Blofeld has created WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Indian Magna Carta listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indian Magna Carta. Since you had some involvement with the Indian Magna Carta redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Green-and-red listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Green-and-red. Since you had some involvement with the Green-and-red redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Plantdrew (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Tobagonian river listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tobagonian river. Since you had some involvement with the Tobagonian river redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tazerdadog (talk) 08:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Friedrich Heinrich


The article Friedrich Heinrich has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * (Neelix) This is a WP:PTM violation as none of these people are known as "Friedrich Heinrich." See also: Articles for deletion/Albert George

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Spirit of Knowledge (The American Adventure in the World Showcase pavilion of Walt Disney World's Epcot).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Spirit of Knowledge (The American Adventure in the World Showcase pavilion of Walt Disney World's Epcot).jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 07:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Statue of Figment, the Disney mascot.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Statue of Figment, the Disney mascot.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 07:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flowerliness


A tag has been placed on Flowerliness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not a word (X1 Neelix)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Floweringly


A tag has been placed on Floweringly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not a word (X1 Neelix)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Willy nilly (philosophy) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Willy nilly (philosophy). Since you had some involvement with the Willy nilly (philosophy) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:58, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Teacher-learner listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teacher-learner. Since you had some involvement with the Teacher-learner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Teacher learners listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teacher learners. Since you had some involvement with the Teacher learners redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Teacher-learners listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teacher-learners. Since you had some involvement with the Teacher-learners redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Teacher learner listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teacher learner. Since you had some involvement with the Teacher learner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Giżycka listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Giżycka. Since you had some involvement with the Giżycka redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Gizycka listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gizycka. Since you had some involvement with the Gizycka redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Collected Essays listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Collected Essays. Since you had some involvement with the Collected Essays redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 23:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Secret State Police listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Secret State Police. Since you had some involvement with the Secret State Police redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Internals listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internals. Since you had some involvement with the Internals redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Internally listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internally. Since you had some involvement with the Internally redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Inactions listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inactions. Since you had some involvement with the Inactions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Socioeconomy listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socioeconomy. Since you had some involvement with the Socioeconomy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S.J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S.J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S.J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 18
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 18, June–July 2016 by, Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads

 Read the full newsletter The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
 * Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
 * TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
 * OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution

Speedy deletion nomination of 海恩波著


A tag has been placed on 海恩波著 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RekishiEJ (talk) 06:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Dagu language listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dagu language. Since you had some involvement with the Dagu language redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Dewu listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dewu. Since you had some involvement with the Dewu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Brush-tailed rat (octodontid) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brush-tailed rat (octodontid). Since you had some involvement with the Brush-tailed rat (octodontid) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hamelekh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hamelekh. Since you had some involvement with the Hamelekh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hamelech listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hamelech. Since you had some involvement with the Hamelech redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Ha-Melech listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ha-Melech. Since you had some involvement with the Ha-Melech redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Ha Melech listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ha Melech. Since you had some involvement with the Ha Melech redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Ha-Melekh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ha-Melekh. Since you had some involvement with the Ha-Melekh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Ha Melekh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ha Melekh. Since you had some involvement with the Ha Melekh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Artificial breeder listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Artificial breeder. Since you had some involvement with the Artificial breeder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Artificial breeders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Artificial breeders. Since you had some involvement with the Artificial breeders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Unnatural breeder listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unnatural breeder. Since you had some involvement with the Unnatural breeder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Unnatural breeders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unnatural breeders. Since you had some involvement with the Unnatural breeders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Artificial selector listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Artificial selector. Since you had some involvement with the Artificial selector redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Artificial selectors listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Artificial selectors. Since you had some involvement with the Artificial selectors redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Artificial selecter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Artificial selecter. Since you had some involvement with the Artificial selecter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Artificial selecters listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Artificial selecters. Since you had some involvement with the Artificial selecters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Unnatural selector listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unnatural selector. Since you had some involvement with the Unnatural selector redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Unnatural selectors listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unnatural selectors. Since you had some involvement with the Unnatural selectors redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Unnatural selecter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unnatural selecter. Since you had some involvement with the Unnatural selecter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Unnatural selecter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unnatural selecter. Since you had some involvement with the Unnatural selecter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing, S.J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing, S.J.. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing, S.J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing, S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing, S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing, S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing, S J listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing, S J. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing, S J redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing, SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing, SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing, SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing S.J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing S.J.. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing S.J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing S J listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing S J. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing S J redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tan Chee Ing SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Tan Chee Ing SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Tan Chee Ing SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S J listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S J. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, S J redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing, SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing S.J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing S.J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing S.J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Tan Chee Ing SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Ing, S.J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Ing, S.J.. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Ing, S.J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Ing, S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Ing, S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Ing, S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Ing, SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Ing, SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Ing, SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Ing S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Ing S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Ing S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Ing S J listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Ing S J. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Ing S J redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Ing SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Ing SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Ing SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing, S.J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing, S.J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing, S.J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing, S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing, S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing, S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing, S J listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing, S J. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing, S J redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing, SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing, SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing, SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing S.J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing S.J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing S.J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing S. J. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing S. J.. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing S. J. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing S J listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing S J. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing S J redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishop Paul Ing SJ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bishop Paul Ing SJ. Since you had some involvement with the Bishop Paul Ing SJ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Sworn listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sworn. Since you had some involvement with the Sworn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Incorrect protein folding listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Incorrect protein folding. Since you had some involvement with the Incorrect protein folding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Incorrectly folded protein listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Incorrectly folded protein. Since you had some involvement with the Incorrectly folded protein redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Incorrectly folded proteins listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Incorrectly folded proteins. Since you had some involvement with the Incorrectly folded proteins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Misfolded proteins listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolded proteins. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolded proteins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Misfolding proteins listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolding proteins. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolding proteins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Misfolds proteins listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolds proteins. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolds proteins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Protein misfolder listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Protein misfolder. Since you had some involvement with the Protein misfolder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Protein misfolders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Protein misfolders. Since you had some involvement with the Protein misfolders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Religously listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Religously. Since you had some involvement with the Religously redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Rametic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rametic. Since you had some involvement with the Rametic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Hectographer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hectographer. Since you had some involvement with the Hectographer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Triangularly


A tag has been placed on Triangularly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Sojourned has been nominated for discussion
Category:Sojourned, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Si Trew (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Sojourns listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sojourns. Since you had some involvement with the Sojourns redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Sojourning listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sojourning. Since you had some involvement with the Sojourning redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Promenading


A tag has been placed on Promenading requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Promenaded


A tag has been placed on Promenaded requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Initiational


A tag has been placed on Initiational requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Sojourned listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sojourned. Since you had some involvement with the Sojourned redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Panging


A tag has been placed on Panging requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Panged


A tag has been placed on Panged requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sufferingly


A tag has been placed on Sufferingly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Primevous


A tag has been placed on Primevous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Restlessly


A tag has been placed on Restlessly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Neelix

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Patient Zerotalk 14:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Identic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Identic. Since you had some involvement with the Identic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Wordcoinage listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wordcoinage. Since you had some involvement with the Wordcoinage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Lunged listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lunged. Since you had some involvement with the Lunged redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Life historians listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Life historians. Since you had some involvement with the Life historians redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Historians of life listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Historians of life. Since you had some involvement with the Historians of life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Historian of life listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Historian of life. Since you had some involvement with the Historian of life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Magic fungi listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Magic fungi. Since you had some involvement with the Magic fungi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Divine fungi listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Divine fungi. Since you had some involvement with the Divine fungi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Herbs of spiritual potency listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Herbs of spiritual potency. Since you had some involvement with the Herbs of spiritual potency redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Large-tongue orchid listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Large-tongue orchid. Since you had some involvement with the Large-tongue orchid redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Large-tongue orchids listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Large-tongue orchids. Since you had some involvement with the Large-tongue orchids redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Largetongue orchid listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Largetongue orchid. Since you had some involvement with the Largetongue orchid redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Largetongue orchids listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Largetongue orchids. Since you had some involvement with the Largetongue orchids redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Unidade, Luta, Progresso listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unidade, Luta, Progresso. Since you had some involvement with the Unidade, Luta, Progresso redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Unity, Struggle, Progress listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unity, Struggle, Progress. Since you had some involvement with the Unity, Struggle, Progress redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Maju Pulu Kita listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maju Pulu Kita. Since you had some involvement with the Maju Pulu Kita redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Keeling Island listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keeling Island. Since you had some involvement with the Keeling Island redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Reconstitution listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reconstitution. Since you had some involvement with the Reconstitution redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tazerdadog (talk) 00:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Leafless-tongue orchid listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leafless-tongue orchid. Since you had some involvement with the Leafless-tongue orchid redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Leafless-tongue orchids listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leafless-tongue orchids. Since you had some involvement with the Leafless-tongue orchids redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Leaflesstongue orchid listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leaflesstongue orchid. Since you had some involvement with the Leaflesstongue orchid redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Leaflesstongue orchids listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leaflesstongue orchids. Since you had some involvement with the Leaflesstongue orchids redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Misfold listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfold. Since you had some involvement with the Misfold redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Misfolds listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolds. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Misfolding listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolding. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Misfolded listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolded. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolded redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

List of North Korean photographers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of North Korean photographers. Since you had some involvement with the List of North Korean photographers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

South Korean photographers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Korean photographers. Since you had some involvement with the South Korean photographers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

North Korean photographers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect North Korean photographers. Since you had some involvement with the North Korean photographers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

North Korean photographer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect North Korean photographer. Since you had some involvement with the North Korean photographer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

List of South Korean photographers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of South Korean photographers. Since you had some involvement with the List of South Korean photographers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

South Korean photographer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Korean photographer. Since you had some involvement with the South Korean photographer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Ci Ling listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ci Ling. Since you had some involvement with the Ci Ling redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Rabbi Wax listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rabbi Wax. Since you had some involvement with the Rabbi Wax redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Misfold proteins listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfold proteins. Since you had some involvement with the Misfold proteins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Misfolders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolders. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Incorrect folding listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Incorrect folding. Since you had some involvement with the Incorrect folding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Misfolder listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misfolder. Since you had some involvement with the Misfolder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

AWH Engineering College, Kozhikode listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AWH Engineering College, Kozhikode. Since you had some involvement with the AWH Engineering College, Kozhikode redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

The Scott Block Theatre listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Scott Block Theatre. Since you had some involvement with the The Scott Block Theatre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Detloff listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Detloff. Since you had some involvement with the Detloff redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Guyane Creoles listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Guyane Creoles. Since you had some involvement with the Guyane Creoles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Guyane Creole listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Guyane Creole. Since you had some involvement with the Guyane Creole redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Scott Block listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scott Block. Since you had some involvement with the Scott Block redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

The Scott Block Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Scott Block Theater. Since you had some involvement with the The Scott Block Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Scott Block Theater has been nominated for discussion
Category:Scott Block Theater, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Si Trew (talk) 23:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Scott Block Theater listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scott Block Theater. Since you had some involvement with the Scott Block Theater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dawson's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dawson's until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 07:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Deplorable listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deplorable. Since you had some involvement with the Deplorable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB298 (talk) 18:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Designated Public Places Orders listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Designated Public Places Orders. Since you had some involvement with the Designated Public Places Orders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 02:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

TM-181 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TM-181. Since you had some involvement with the TM-181 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

TM181 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TM181. Since you had some involvement with the TM181 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

TM 181 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TM 181. Since you had some involvement with the TM 181 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Z-181 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Z-181. Since you had some involvement with the Z-181 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Z181 has been nominated for discussion
Category:Z181, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Si Trew (talk) 00:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Z181 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Z181 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Z181 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 00:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Z181 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Z181. Since you had some involvement with the Z181 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Biys listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Biys. Since you had some involvement with the Biys redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Undesirable listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Undesirable. Since you had some involvement with the Undesirable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

AZX (company) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AZX (company). Since you had some involvement with the AZX (company) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

School yards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect School yards. Since you had some involvement with the School yards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

School yard listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect School yard. Since you had some involvement with the School yard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Schoolyards listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Schoolyards. Since you had some involvement with the Schoolyards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Schoolyard listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Schoolyard. Since you had some involvement with the Schoolyard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)