User talk:Neelofafiance

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jengka 4 (March 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jengka 4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jengka 4, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jengka_4 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jengka_4 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Neelofa, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qalisha Ray (July 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Qalisha Ray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Qalisha Ray, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Qalisha_Ray Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Amkgp&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Qalisha_Ray reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬  12:56, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Qalisha Ray


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Qalisha Ray, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jengka 4


Hello, Neelofafiance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jengka 4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 01:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The information you give was wrong
Hello Neelofafiance, I would like to remind you that the information that you give was wrong, I have seen on Google Search that there are no reliable sources provided to shown that Neelofa has engaged, the name you give "Muhammad Adam bin Ahmad" is obviously false, and you also do the same thing at Malay Wikipedia. My advice to you, please don't added unsourced materials here before you blocked indefinitely. I don't want Wikipedia as a place for providing false information, we just want to ensure information given on pages on this site (especially biography) is true and accurate. Please leave your message to my talk page if you have anything to discuss or if you think I made a mistake. Thank you in advance.—Fandi89 (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GRuban (talk) 01:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Permalink-- Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1054. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 01:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
 UTRS decline I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here " . Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see

''. Please address the false, unsourced content you have been adding to Wikipedia. Please describe what constructive edits you would make. Thanks you. '' -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 01:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)