User talk:Nefariousopus

Your Chevy Enthusiast userbox
Hey. I had to remove the Chevy logo, per this policy. I'd recommend reading it if you haven't already. Thanks! Jonathan speak out 18:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Messages
Jonathan talk - contribs - review me! 16:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

No prob!
Also, there's a different version:. Jonathan How's the weather? - talk about me behind my back 02:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Parnassian poets
Go ahead and delete that page you tagged. It was supposed to be a user subpage. "My bad." Alex contributing from L.A. (talk) 09:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. But it should be deleted anyway even as a user subpage. I was just letting off steam because I edited hastily instead of checking Wikisource where they had all of this guy's work listed and reproduced. Instead I copy-pasted a list of his works off of some website, which was probably a wiki mirror site anyway. Lesson learned. Check Wikisource. Alex contributing from L.A. (talk) 09:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Your comment at Talk:Ammonia
You complained about vulgar language here. I don't think Engineman was trying to be offensive: "fag" is not a vulgar word in British English, it is a very common slang term for "cigarette"! Physchim62 (talk) 10:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL-- Editor510  drop us a line, mate  17:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Antithesis of light.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Antithesis of light.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DismentOfSoul.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DismentOfSoul.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Racism
The userbox you made about Islam seems a bit racist. I am not Muslim, I am agnostic, but I think some Wikipedians will be offended. Take care with userboxes or you may get a ban.-- Editor510  drop us a line, mate  17:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, well it still seems a bit offensive, Muslims are a kind religion, not beheading-obsessed maniacs.-- Editor510  drop us a line, mate  15:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Antithesis of light.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Antithesis of light.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Intimes2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Intimes2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Nefariousopus/Userboxes/BeheadIslam
User:Nefariousopus/Userboxes/BeheadIslam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nefariousopus/Userboxes/BeheadIslam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Nefariousopus/Userboxes/BeheadIslam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SharabSalam (talk) 22:18, 15 December 2019 (UTC)