User talk:Neferkheperre

Your submission at AfC Notochthamalinae was accepted
 Notochthamalinae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! StarryGrandma (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Welcome!!!
I wanted to welcome you to WIkipedia Neferkheperre, and to thank you for all the contributions you have already made this month! Like you I am also a citizen scientist -- a malacologist, so I also respect barnacles, and apologize for the fact that some of my guys eat some of your guys! :) Invertzoo (talk) 00:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Reply
If you look on my talk page you will see that I replied to your note there. Invertzoo (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Pseudoctomeris was accepted
 Pseudoctomeris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ragesoss (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Ways to improve Catomerus
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Neferkheperre, thanks for creating Catomerus!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. /

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Chthamaloidea was accepted
 Chthamaloidea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Anup Mehra  ✈ 09:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590131154 your edit] to Notochthamalus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * the confamilial barnacle Chthamalus cirratus and Balanus flosculus. rp|468

Identification keys for species, etc.
Hello again Neferkheperre. I would suggest that you put a copy of your question onto the talk page of Tree of Life and see what people say there. I think I personally have not so far seen an identification key in a Wikipedia taxon article (although there may be some somewhere that I have not come across.) In any case, a key would not fit into the taxobox, and so if one is included it would probably be as a section under a heading within the main text of the article (as we do in the gastropod project with cladograms). I am assuming you mean identification keys that you yourself would have devised? Not keys copied from published texts? The Tree of Life project editors can give you some input as to whether they think self-constructed keys (or attributed keys) are OK to include. Invertzoo (talk) 13:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596709445 your edit] to Pseudoctomeris may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Poltarukha}}, 1996; (generic re-assignment): 2006; {rp|84}  (supplemental description, discussion).

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nesochthamalus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Papua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikispecies user box
I just wanted to remind you that you can promote Wikispecies by using the WS admin user box. Dan Koehl (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR cleanup drive
Sent of behalf of for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

PeterR on WS
Ray, user account PeterR seems to be running an unauthorised AWB which is making at least some counterproductive changes on a large scale. You should block him pending clarification of the situation on the VP. Removing Category:Reference Template is not only a waste of time and effort, but also means that reference templates cannot be identified as such by a machine, which could severely limit their long-term utility. Apricia oh so jovialis (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)