User talk:Neffateriet/sandbox

Thank You All for Your Feedback
Neffateriet

Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review: 5/15/2013

Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: Neffateriet

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Length was good

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes it is adherent to I/O Psychology

Wikiformatting: good formatting

Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was good

Other comments: good job!

User:A_Bhagwandin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Joselv83 (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Joselv83 (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Aman11040 (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Aman11040 (talk) 02:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Azahur (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Azahur (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
{| class="wikitable"

! Name of student reviewer !! Wikipedia User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
 * Date of review || 5/13/2013
 * Name of editor|| Wikipedia User: :Neffateriet
 * URL of editor’s Userpage ||http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
 * Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page || 05/13/13
 * Date review submitted to instructor || 05/13/13
 * Length of edit (too long/too short) ||good length
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || none picture needed
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || the information was accurate
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed ||N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Accurate to I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Good Format
 * Grammar & composition || Good
 * Other comments|| good
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || none picture needed
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || the information was accurate
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed ||N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Accurate to I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Good Format
 * Grammar & composition || Good
 * Other comments|| good
 * Wikiformatting || Good Format
 * Grammar & composition || Good
 * Other comments|| good
 * Grammar & composition || Good
 * Other comments|| good
 * Other comments|| good

Vimmy (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre edit peer review
{| class="wikitable"

! Name of student reviewer !! Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey Joan Bailey (talk) 19:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Date of review || 5/15/2013
 * Name of editor|| Wikipedia User: Neffateriet
 * URL of editor’s Userpage ||http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
 * Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page || 05/15/13
 * Date review submitted to instructor || 05/15/13
 * Length of edit (too long/too short) ||The length of the edit is Good.
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || N/A
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook information is accurately edited.
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || The information presented relates to I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || N/A
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook information is accurately edited.
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || The information presented relates to I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job
 * Other comments|| Nice job