User talk:Nefos67

Welcome!
Hello, Nefos67, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page James Petras, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! JaventheAldericky (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to James Petras has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: James Petras was changed by Nefos67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903639 on 2019-06-20T22:49:06+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at James Petras, you may be blocked from editing. Take your concerns to the talk page of the article McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:53, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at James Petras. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jack90s15 (talk) 19:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JaventheAlderick. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James Petras have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. JaventheAldericky (talk) 19:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jack90s15 (talk) 19:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James Petras, you may be blocked from editing. JaventheAldericky (talk) 19:24, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at James Pretras shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anne drew 19:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [ trigger the edit filter], as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)