User talk:Neha agarval

Recent edit to Kung Fu Yoga
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kung Fu Yoga, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Tolly 4  bolly  13:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Jungle Book (1994 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Materialscientist (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit to The Bourne Supremacy (film)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Bourne Supremacy (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Bourne Supremacy (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 11:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and promotional editing

 * Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion or advertising, so please don't post promotional material, as you have done at User:Neha agarval/sandbox.
 * If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. JBW (talk) 12:34, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism
Since writing the message above I have looked further at your editing history. It is clear that both the page you created and your edits to articles have contained deliberately false claims. You will be blocked from editing if you continue in that way. JBW (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JBW (talk) 14:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)