User talk:NeilN/Archive 9

About Tiger Woods
There is rumors about Tiger Woods's real name being Wiger Toods everywhere (even though the rumor is false)! It's on YouTube and my dad even thinks so! So if that's what you're looking for, please put my edit back. It is not a hoax. It is a real rumor. RobertRay45821 (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here -- Neil N   talk to me  13:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Hi. Thank you for coming. I always use the Talk page but other side always do what himself believes. I just invite him to discuss in what he add. I'm surely agree with you and tired of this fight. please, Protect that article. Regards. P. Pajouhesh (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

IT DOES MATTER WHAT MY DAD THINKS!!!
Do you know the defenition of the word "rumor"? It is what people spread out thinking. I could get somebody to ban you. Besides, I can't really prove it unless I tell you in real life. Also, people believe that Tiger Woods is his real name but then they think "who is named Tiger?". So stop or else I'll get Kww (a Wikipedia user) to ban you. RobertRay45821 (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * C. Fred pretty much nailed it -- Neil N   talk to me  22:15, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Sayyid Jamal-ad-Din Asadabadi
User:Mazdakabedi violated the 3RR 1, 2, 3. Not only that, he is causing disruption by placing false protections, abusing my talk page , attacking me by calling me names. He's asking me to discuss but there's nothing for me to discuss with him. All the sources have the subject's name very clear for us and I've cited about 10 credible sources which state that the subject was born in Afghanistan. Therefore, I have nothing else to discuss about this subject and Wikipedia talk pages are not to be used as forums to write stuff.--Afghan American (talk) 03:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * See? He really doesn't want to talk about the article. When anyone invite him to talk, He objects it and does what he believes. He even suspects me! You can judge the condition. It's not his first time. P. Pajouhesh (talk) 18:52, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please look at the citations User talk:Ramcrk provides to prove his point of view. he is indeed making disruptive edits. If you observe his edit patterns, you will see that he is trying to show Andhra culture in bad perspective
 * Replied here -- Neil N   talk to me  02:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * did you issue same warning to User talk:Ramcrk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nagarjuna198 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here -- Neil N   talk to me  03:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Please see my comments in the discussion page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nagarjuna198 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry
I didn't mean by any way to change the president's picture i was only trying to add a picture to Rebbeca blacks picture and i used obama's page as template but by mistake i changed it sorry for that confusion i am still new here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonykakki (talk • contribs) 05:08, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

My user and talk page
Hi NeilN, I was going to ask you about this months ago but you were not active for a while back then. My user and talk page have a red page notice at the top of them. I'm not sure why that is so and don't even know what purpose it serves but at around that time you had appeared on my page when the argumentative teenager who used to follow me around was threatening to report me for reverting him on something (and that he was wrong on) Could you remove it from both pages if you did put it there or if you didn't give me some clue as to why it should be there? Thanks so much for your help! Hope you're doing well and glad to see you're editing again. Agadant (talk) 00:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Solved -- Neil N   talk to me  01:10, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Fabricio's picture
I appreciate your concern with the picture. However Fabricio specifically asked me to change his Wikipedia photo to this new one because it depicts him and his best friend, Antonio. I will fix the orientation, but please allow me to change it to the photo of him and his friend. It is Fabricio's wish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.244.153.235 (talk) 04:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here. -- Neil N   talk to me  05:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit War
I think its the time you have to moderate the discussion in Andhra article. He posts only the things which signifies nothing but Chauvinistic attitude of some authors while there are many mainstream authors who dont agree with these things. He got me blocked for no fault of mine. Please moderate this discussion. Please read the article and you will understand the tone of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nagarjuna198 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please have a look at the series of edits that Nagarjuna198 has done to the article. Thanks, &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 04:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit on Human
I thought that I did put sufficient evidence on the changes. However, after a day since you posted there was an error on it, I've thought though I still think I was not wrong in the edit, the details could have been placed instead as 'further reading' instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Witchlady (talk • contribs) 08:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Sony
Who are you? If you're a moderator, it's RIDICULOUS to allow unsubstantiated rumors to be on a front page of a wiki article. RIDICULOUS and without merit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AranhaHunter (talk • contribs) 04:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC) Except the rumor is not, I just posted proof that the rumor was started by a blogger. Wikipedia is not a place for unsubstantiated rumors like this. This is ridiculous.
 * Replied here -- Neil N   talk to me  04:12, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Removal of an external link
Dear Neil, you recently removed a link that I have placed under the search term Teleportation. The link was
 * "Teleportation, in hole vaccum", from [MindAbilities Services]

This link goes back to a very interesting article on teleportation which researches on the topic will find very interesting to read. It is exactly the type of article found in the last four External Links, a description of a new theory on teleportation. I have placed that link back on but with the title matching the one of the article hoping that it is more correct according to your standards.

Best Regards,

George Georgiou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdomis (talk • contribs) 11:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Satavahana Dynasty
Please see the differences in that article, I tried to phrase the facts in a right manner. If you really feel my version is not neutral, revert back as some unknown user is trying to revert my changes.

Nagarjuna198 (talk) 00:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Afd
Hi,

I thought I was right in the first instance! That shows what editing late at night can do to you! I'm on a mobile device right now, so reverting would be impractical. Please feel free to fix it yourself, or I can do it tomorrow afternoon.

Thanks,

The Helpful  One  01:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I won't be reverting as Rememberway has started to fix the errors. Other editors might still push for a stubbing though. -- Neil N   talk to me  01:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

I added two non-commercial links and removed a spammy link for a commercial software company.
Under event planning...

I keep on getting 'warning' notices. Not sure why...the site seemed to be on target. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BioDavid (talk • contribs) 14:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Getting information
THIS IS NOT AN ARTICLE FOR WIKIPEDIA Before I put the information on this page that I would like you to comment on, I want to check that it is not going on a live page or being made public. This is to get information and answers to questions. How do you do a talk that is just between a moderator and yourself?

Can I also say, it is completely unclear how to talk with people on Wikipedia. I had to resort to leaving a message on the actual site, which I don't think looks very good. I hope I will see your response. (Bertbert1 (talk) 21:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC))

3RR
Being rude does not get you far. If there is no intervention you and the other editor are well on the way to the 3rr process. Moreover, I am sorry mis reading your name for another editor further down the list. Intoronto1125 Talk  Contributions  02:08, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here. -- Neil N   talk to me  02:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the grammar.

Being rude does not get you far. If there is no intervention you and the other editor are well on the way to the 3rr process. Moreover, I am sorry for misreading your name for another editor further down the list. <-- That is what I meant to say.

Well, I saw the other editor was reverting every edit and I saw your name on the top so, I mistook you for the other editor(s) and I am sorry. I understand you are a veteran here please do not take this personally. Finally, I do not give out 3rr warning after one revert. Intoronto1125 Talk  Contributions  02:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All's well. -- Neil N   talk to me  02:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

How do I email you
Another question, you say I can email you, how do I do that? Where do I go to email you? (Bertbert1 (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC))

Thank you NeilN for the changes regarding the Personal Life section on Joan Armatrading page. At least it now reads as if is NOT an official announcement by Miss Armatrading (Bertbert1 (talk) 14:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)).

Savera Nadeem
Thanks for guiding me.....savera —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.65.147.46 (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you, for the vandalism patrol help, at Santorum (sexual neologism). -- Cirt (talk) 02:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

3rr
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Much appreciated
Thank you, very much, for your comments regarding the quality improvements I have made to the article Santorum (sexual neologism). Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 06:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Twitter accounts
Thesource73 twitter has no verification option anymore that has been closed for sometime now as you can see on the official http://support.twitter.com/groups/31-twitter-basics/topics/111-features/articles/119135-about-verified-accounts page, celebs have to give their own option for verification in these cases they give Production Company's you can call and that has been done. I'm a Celeb reporter myself in The Netherlands and verify all my resources, if you want to do it yourself you can contact the given Company's. Phone call recordings is a violation of the law and I am not breaking the law here for you guys so you will have to make the call yourself, you can point a representative from wiki to me he can contact me for more information on that. So I would like to have the pages restored with the links I posted as they are verified. Again I am not going to brake the law just because someone on wiki is to lazy to make the call themselfs again Phone Call recording is a violation of the Privacy Act and so can not be done, you or Nymf or whoever from wiki will have to make the Call yourself. Also the account for Jennifer Lawrence have been verified not only to me but also to a lot of other people.The Source (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)--The Source (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here -- Neil N    talk to me  14:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Ellen White and masturbation
Dear Neil,

I'm sorry I misunderstood the policy Bout edits on Wiki. You state that I need to cite published material for saying Ellen White did not write "A olemmn Appeal." I said in my explanation that I have had the book in my library for many years and Ellen's name does NOT appear on it, only that of her husband James. If you care to send me your mailing address, I will be glad to mail you a copy.

Sidreiners (talk) 00:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC) Sidney Reiners

PS I thought that presenting an entire book as evidence would constitute both 1) a published reference, and 2) original research. :)


 * Replied here. -- Neil N   talk to me  01:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Consider the following regarding authorship of the quoted section in Ellen G. White. There are at least two primary sources for this quote: An Appeal to Mothers published in 1864 and A Solemn Appeal published in 1870. It has been suggested that James White authored "A Solemn Appeal". The White Estate rendition of A Solemn Appeal starts with this, "My Sisters: My apology for addressing you on this subject is, I am a mother, and feel alarmed for those children and youth who by solitary vice are ruining themselves for this world, and for that which is to come. Let us closely inquire into this subject from a physical, mental, and moral point of view. {SA 49.1}" Ellen White's authorship for An Appeal to Mothers has not been questioned as far as I know. The wording of the two works, i.e. Appeal to Mothers and Solemn Appeal, seem essentially the same. I am also intrigued with the change of gender pronoun. The quote used a masculine pronoun for Nature whereas the original seemed to be a feminine pronoun. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 14:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

RE: removal of my edits on Minissha Lamba page
Thank you for your feedback. I re-read what I have written and realized my mistake. I have modified my text and am about to save them. I would appreciate if you could take a look at it to ensure I am no longer violating any rules. Also, please let me know if you are using any tool to find out copyright violations; so that I can use it to avoid future occurrences of this such incidents. Thanks Saurag (talk) 20:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

re Mentioned at ANI
Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. -- Neil N   talk to me  12:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Curious as to why the individual that started the ANI thread, neglected to post a notification. -- Cirt (talk) 17:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

No bite
I noticed the message you recently left to a newcomer. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you.
 * I left the message to you actually. What was impolite about it? -- Neil N   talk to me  20:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

regarding the web tags i have inserted in Hoshiarpur
Hi NeiIN, why u think it is not proper tags ..

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vsharman (talk • contribs) 16:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  16:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

-- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 12:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Rememberway's words-as-articles
Hi Neil, I've never noticed Rememberway before, and although I agree with his stance on "generally" (I haven't even looked at that NOUN thing), he needs to cool down and approach editors with whom he has difficulties with more skill. Can he be steered there, since minus the steam, he could be a useful contributor. I'm confused by this term words-as-articles. Is it article as in "the", or as in WP article? Tony  (talk)  09:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * He was editing as User:Wolfkeeper before and had issues with articles like Yankee, Prithee, and Gay (articles about words). -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  09:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

External link on Chiranjeevi
I have added the link telugucomedy.com/chiranjeevi to external links on the page Chiranjeevi and I wonder why it is marked as spam. I'm building a comedy database for Telugu film industry and earning $0 as of now. I know that external links doesn't increase my search rankings, I just added the link so that people get to know the my database for telugu comedy and can find the content useful for them.

Building the exact same as IMDb but just for Telugu Comedy, any kind of telugu comedy can be archived on my database, I'll be giving editing rights to anonymous users just like IMDb and Wikipedia. I wonder why IMDb's links are considered safe and my database's links as spam. I need an answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudo-swiki (talk • contribs) 18:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  18:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

how to get this page (J. L. Edwards(No 1 Best-selling author)) back???
sir what i have to do, what changes to make to get the page back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnedwards1225 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC) To have an article on Edwards, you'll need to make a number of changes: Make sure the article is written in neutral point of view and not in overtly promotional tone. Demonstrate that Edwards is a notable person. Cite reliable sources that are independent of Edwards to back up the claims of notability. The third point is especially important since, based on your username and your access to Edwards to take photos of him (that are on Commons), you have a conflict of interest with the subject. (Comments mirrored to your talk page.) —C.Fred (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC) And the highly dubious "No 1 Best-selling author" imbedded within the name of the first-draft version is not a good start. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

So how can i get the article back to edit it, wel the article is written in neutral point of view , i think all i have to do is add references , will article be ok if add references?Johnedwards1225 (talk) 14:14, 25 May 2011 (UTC) How is language like "As an author, one of his masterpieces is a Fictional novel" and "His other adorable publications include" neutral point of view? This was a very blatant advertisement; and again, "No 1 Best-selling author" appears to be a flat-out lie. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

OK, sir actually i am new here , so please tell me , what esle changes i have to made to get my page back??? i need your help please point out all the mistakes waiting for your replyJohnedwards1225 (talk) 14:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC) I find it odd that a professional author would not write using proper sentence structure and grammar. Regardless, if you can point to some reliable sources showing you meet our notability criteria for authors, I will help you. You can reply on my talk page. --NeilN talk to me 16:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC) [edit] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnedwards1225 (talk • contribs) 13:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

ok here are the references sir

 * www.federan.org
 * www.priceofhumans.com
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Orange_High_School
 * http://diccionario.sensagent.com/East_Orange_Campus_High_School/en-en/
 * http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/6666284
 * http://www.eastorange.k12.nj.us/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=33 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnedwards1225 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The first link doesn't mention you, the second link doesn't work, and the rest say that you're a principal at a school. Where are the links showing you are a notable author? -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  14:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

sorry it is www.priceofhumans.com

check it now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnedwards1225 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The problem with the priceofhumans site is it appears to be written by Edwards or otherwise is under his control. There are very limited uses for self-published sources in articles; specifically, they may not be used to support the notability of the subject.


 * In other words, you can't write about yourself here just because you wrote about yourself somewhere else. —C.Fred (talk) 15:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

here is annother link sir http://sites.google.com/site/priceofhumans/Johnedwards1225 (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Confirmed:
 * Registrant: John Edwards
 * Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
 * Domain Name: PRICEOFHUMANS.COM


 * These sites cannot be used to confirm notability in any way. We need independent third party sources. -- Neil N   <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  16:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

link :- http://www.yourdreamsbonuses.com/

please check this

if a author deosnt have any link, what you are asking for then what to do to post the article on wikipedia?Johnedwards1225 (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * If the author doesn't have any links to acceptable third party sources then they shouldn't have an article on Wikipedia. Simply put, people get articles written about them after they're famous, not before. -- Neil N   <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  14:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

ok please provide me an example of link you are asking for Johnedwards1225 (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * For authors it would be reviews of a well-known work or a significant body of work by multiple independent well-regarded periodicals or newspapers or the winning of a significant prize. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  14:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

sir please check out this link :- http://www.yourdreamsbonuses.com/

is that ok? for reference?Johnedwards1225 (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No. I'm not sure why you don't get this. It is an advertising site not a well-regarded periodical or newspaper like the New York Times or London Book Review. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  14:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Star City Birmingham edits
Hi, I see you have reverted all of my edits to the Star City Birmingham Wikipedia entry. These are genuine edits to correct incorrect information and links. We (Crystal Presentations) are appointed web/marketing agency for Star City and have been requested to correct the wikipage page on their behalf. Can your re-instate my revsions please.

Regards Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystalpres (talk • contribs) 09:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied here. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  09:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply. The revisions I made to the article were purely factual and I made a concious effort to not be promotional. I also corrected broken links and incorrect information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystalpres (talk • contribs) 10:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

atheist opinions
dont matter :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.20.51.50 (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * But our policies and guidelines do. Blocked. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  15:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Well why don't you stop Avaya1 from giving be that exact same warning for simply defending the page as it stood?--Matt Downey (talk) 21:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Not really though. I'm defending the section as it stood on 15th of May when Avaya1 seemed to randomly start adding that text, after the issue had already been resolved on the discussion page. She only has one new source, the Sunday Times, hardly likely to be unbiased and independent when it comes to the leader of the Lib Dems. Free Bear's edit is perfectly countered by Sir Richardson's edit summery "None of the sources claim Clegg to have been a member. They illustrate the possibility based upon evidence" so I don't understand why he would add new text stating that he was without a doubt a member. This is an edit warring campaign started by Avaya1 on the 15th of may. I have NOT done anything wrong--Matt Downey (talk) 21:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Because content was added and some removed for which there was no reason, no different to putting "Nick Clegg is a di**". There is no justification for any of her edits--Matt Downey (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

US Senators
Sorry but it wasn't me the one who deleted the religions but a guy named Dodiad. I simply done a revertion and didn'd check.--178.128.75.48 (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Arbitation Request
Yes that was me - still working on it though.Alex79818 (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

US Senators
Sorry, but for what are you talking about?--46.12.45.67 (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It wasn't me. I simply have the bad habit when I do revetions I don't check for faults.--46.12.45.67 (talk) 18:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

So, we are friends, no?--46.12.45.67 (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Removing my edits...
You mind telling me what this is about? Like why did u remove my edits to the CSI: Miami page when it is pure fact what I wrote??

June 2, 2011 (diff | hist). . m CSI: Miami‎; 00:42. . (-551) . . NeilN (talk | contribs) (Reverted 1 edit by DavidQT69 (talk): Rv WP:NOR. using TW) (diff | hist). .  CSI: Miami‎; 00:38. . (+551) . . DavidQT69 (talk | contribs) (Just made some corrections that I saw fit to make, being I live in Miami and I also watch the show religiously...)

•• David (Username: DavidQT69) 04:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
... for reverting my userpage:. This is becoming habit, heh. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 17:50, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Consensus
I don't give a damn what that editor thinks. If for the past 3 years people have all agreed that this information was unnecessary/wrong to the point of not bothering to challenge it I call that consensus. This is being pursued on ideological grounds to make Nick Clegg appear more right wing. I don't care if he is or isn't, but his article should simply present facts and not try to make him appear one way or the other.--Matt Downey (talk) 01:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Gloaming
Gloaming is the Standard English form. The Scots form is gloamin. 79.197.172.149 (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid accusations that this posting violates WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 19:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Help needed
I have noticed that you have done significant consistent contributions to the Zardari page. Could you please join the discussion at FA nomination for Zardari? I may be leaving the country for a month in 3 days and do not want the nomination to fail if I am gone. Any help would be appreciated. Reformation32 (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

213.67.79.186
Hi dear friend. I saw 213.67.79.186 that work such as a vandal and POV without source. look at his edites please, control him.P. Pajouhesh (talk) 20:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect information check the facts
Neil, as I said before very difficult to use Wikipedia especially if you are not using it all the time. This is not for adding to Joan's page it is to give information to get some changes to a statement on her page. Someone has put Joan was dubbed by the media Armourplating, this is not correct. It came out of Joan telling the story in an interview at the start of her career of the play on her name that was used in school. If you check records you will see that this was used as a headline at the time of Joan telling the story. The new statement on Joan's page is a false representation and should be taken out. Now that Wikipedia has put it on the page it's likely that people will start to use it and think that this is a true statement. It was not the media who dubbed Joan but Joan who told the story on the play on her name at school. Yes Joan values her privacy I don't think there is any need to put this statement on her page it's pretty obvious after 40 year in entertainment that she is a private person. What can we do about changing that statement or removing it altogether? It's not actually a news article but written by someone who wants to add to Joan's page in a way that comes across, to my mind, a little vindictively. (Bertbert1 (talk) 17:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC))

Would You like to Help?
Hi, I am starting WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the []. McKinseies (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)